Posted on 12/10/2015 1:17:32 PM PST by ArGee
Raqqa, Syria
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, also known as ISIS, announced today that he would be disbanding all forces and returning all land to Syria and Iraq. The move was prompted by the ongoing Climate Conference in Paris.
"This is one thing we could not have anticipated," Mr. al-Baghdadi said in prepared remarks. "When we see the world coming together like this on such a dangerous subject as Global Climate Change, we realize that our Caliphate will never survive. It's only a matter of time before Climate Change is no more and the world's attention turns to us. At that point, we will have no chance. For the sake of the men, women, and children who have supported us, I can not continue a doomed campaign."
An emotional al-Baghdadi did not take any questions.
Sources close to al-Baghdadi who spoke on the condition of anonymity told us that it was becoming more and more difficult to recruit new fighters. "Even our existing people are extremely demoralized," one said. "The words of Donald Trump himself can not overcome our dispair."
According to their press release, surrender is total and immediate. Fighters are being paid and sent home by division. Any remaining money will be put into a fund to resettle Christians and Yazidis who have been displaced by the war.
"We thought the world was fragmented," one strategist was overheard saying to himself. "Who knew it could come together like this? This is a stinging rebuke."
So far there has been no comment from Damascus, Baghdad, Moscow, or Washington. One source inside the Kremlin said, "We are waiting to see if there will be any follow-up action. We want to make sure this is real before we decide on our next steps."
And all the Best of the Day to you,Face! *Hoisting a glass of GingerBeard.*
(Ginger brewed Ale)
The daffodils are the most plenteous among the few klingons from previous persons-on-the-property. There are a few tulips - mostly red but one interesting orange one, the crocus in various spots in the grass of the nominal east yard that I haven't seen this year, a lone peony, the hostas that are along the east side of that stone watering trough (the brown patch with some broken off flower stalks strewn about that will become one with the universe when visited by the little red ridingthing in mow mode), and a rose that finally succumbed to Rose Rosette disease after surviving being mowed repeatedly by previouspersons. It was a pretty 'old' rose something like this:

There is a similar one growing in the tree line on the nominal west property line. It was surrounded by a much more energetic wild white rose that I chopped out a while back (they were/are all over the place including the 'pasture'). Fortunately for the rose in question it was easy to spot what with its red blooms among all the white and thus didn't get chopped. I'm wary of trying to relocate it to a spot not shaded by maple but it is not really thriving, merely existing where it is.
And Tipton T. Longcat has given up on 'Lapcat Mode' and has relocated himself to the pillow previously owned by the late Roberta White..
That would be it..
Well, there was that explosion today at the National Zoo in washington DC today. A chlorine tank exoloded between the beaver and otter enclosures.
A very tense ceasefire is in effect while the field of battle is cleared.
Sec. State Jean Francois KerrIE to issue a statement any day now, on the one pond, two pond proposal.
ping to my post below.
If a neighbor has a shovel, s/he has probably forgotten where s/he put it. That happens a lot here. I’m thinking it may be a good idea to invest in some gardening-type implements so I can do a bit of digging and transplanting. Besides...I’m thinking about roses...
And that pic looks like a Rose of Sharon. But I may be wrong....
And there are some patches of violets in various places on the lawn, and I think I can bring some of them here. There is a flower bed along my east wall, so it would be fun to put some blooming things there, even if I move out of here. I will ponder these things and decide soon.
That’s a weird event.
Animals and Splody things.....No can’t be, Can it? Hmmm.

That was the first thing I thought of.
Actually, DC sort-of operates in its own version of nature.
You’ll notice The Walking Dead is never filmed there.
That’s because the denizens have nothing the zombies want.
LOL! true dat
LOL!
And there is proof!
:D
We have two of those which Mrs. NoC planted.
Most of the old roses (before the breeders got busy) were single bloomtypes such as in the previous photo.
On the subject of shovels, one of those GI trenching tools works especially if you're not trying to spade a garden, and is collapsible..
Have got Two of those shovels.
Easily stowed in the car.
The rivets need replacing fairly quickly,but it was getting abused.
Hmmmm. If I get into Vegas to the Army Surplus Store, I will look foe the trencher.
The Rose of Sharon is vastly different from the hibiscus. Much smaller and with more colors.
Perhaps I need two of those trenching tools: one for the BB SUV and one for the house. I will check on the price of both, when next I get into Vegas!
These days, I’m all about self protection. I’m a ol’ lady, y’ know!
I now see how widely divided we are! Moss roses are succulent plants that CA uses to line the inclines of the CA freeways, especially in moist climates along the coast.
Those are either roses of Sharon or wild roses, but they are not moss roses. Sorry, NC...
I now see how widely divided we are! Moss roses are succulent plants that CA uses to line the inclines of the CA freeways, especially in moist climates along the coast.
Those are either roses of Sharon or wild roses, but they are not moss roses. Sorry, NC...
That collection of all the worlds knowledge also called Wikipedia says "Rose of Sharon is a common name that has been applied to several different species of flowering plants that are valued in different parts of the world. It is also a biblical expression, though the identity of the plant referred to is also unclear, and is disputed by biblical scholars. In neither case does it refer to actual roses, although one of the species it refers to in modern usage is a member of Rosaceae."
Unfortunately, in typical Wikipedia fashon, they don't tell us what member of the rose family the term refers to...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.