Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Blumenauer: Marijuana Sales Taxes in Oregon to Be Spent on Drug Addiction Treatment
Cybercast News Service ^ | June 3, 2015 | 11:30 AM EDT | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 06/03/2015 1:00:04 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) said Wednesday on C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers” that the tax revenue from legalized marijuana sales in his state will go in part towards treating drug addiction.

When asked how much Oregon will tax legalized marijuana and how the tax revenue will be spent, Blumenauer said it will be allocated among a number of things, one of which will be to deal with addiction.

“Voters decided that it’s available to deal with addiction, people who are addicted—whether it’s to a drug or alcohol, gambling—we need more resources,” he said, adding that some voters want it to go towards law enforcement and education. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: cannabis; earlblumenauer; marijuana; oregon; salestax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: tacticalogic
That's a different prediction that what was originally posited - that the marijuana users will eventually all become heroin users.

That is obviously an excessively detailed overreach of the salient concept. No, not all marijuana users will eventually turn to Heroin, but a lot of people will be encouraged by legal drugs to push deeper, and those people will eventually end up on some much worse life destroying drug.

And that statement is not intended to minimize the damage caused to people's lives from being pot-heads. Drug addicts invariably start out on weed.

21 posted on 06/04/2015 12:51:30 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
The prediction was for all users, not just those susceptible to addiction.

Again an attempt to discredit a larger concept by trying to focus on specifics. I'm back to the need of that Fission analogy.

22 posted on 06/04/2015 12:54:27 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Again an attempt to discredit a larger concept by trying to focus on specifics.

You set the goal post. Now, leave it there.

23 posted on 06/04/2015 1:09:43 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
You set the goal post. Now, leave it there.

Not at all. You are trying to make that other man's words come out of my mouth. You might have noticed by now that I didn't make the original statement, I simply affirmed its validity as a general principle, and continue to do so despite your efforts to discredit it by focusing on exceptions.

24 posted on 06/04/2015 1:27:11 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Tthis isn’t a play, this is reality. And in reality the gateway drug theory has been known to be false for a very very long time.


25 posted on 06/04/2015 1:29:44 PM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Tthis isn’t a play, this is reality. And in reality the gateway drug theory has been known to be false for a very very long time.

No it hasn't. Libertarians just keep spreading this claim along with all their other false claims. It's what they do.

26 posted on 06/04/2015 1:44:02 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Not at all. You are trying to make that other man's words come out of my mouth. You might have noticed by now that I didn't make the original statement, I simply affirmed its validity as a general principle, and continue to do so despite your efforts to discredit it by focusing on exceptions.

The original statement was not proffered seriously, but rather as sarcasm precisely because copious exceptions belie the validity of the general principle.

27 posted on 06/04/2015 1:44:54 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
The original statement was not proffered seriously, but rather as sarcasm precisely because copious exceptions belie the validity of the general principle.

If you grasped this essential difference, why are you making an issue out of it?

28 posted on 06/04/2015 1:46:21 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Democrats in WA State want to lower the marijuana tax and raise the B and O tax on small businesses.


29 posted on 06/04/2015 1:47:27 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Nope:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600369/

you’re wrong. The gateway drug theory is bunk, known to be bunk, and anybody relying on it is making false claims. It’s what you do.


30 posted on 06/04/2015 1:50:47 PM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
If you grasped this essential difference, why are you making an issue out of it?

Because your inability to discern parody from reality demonstrates just how far down the rabbit hole you've gone.

31 posted on 06/04/2015 1:59:18 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: discostu
you’re wrong. The gateway drug theory is bunk, known to be bunk, and anybody relying on it is making false claims. It’s what you do.

You can piss all you want, but we know it isn't rain. Any study which claims that Marijuana doesn't lead to harder drugs for some people is simply wrong on the face of it.

That's one thing about the Libertarians and the Gay Activists. They are both always creating studies to "prove" that their kooky theories are correct. Sensible people don't pay them any mind.

32 posted on 06/04/2015 2:06:56 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Because your inability to discern parody from reality demonstrates just how far down the rabbit hole you've gone.

Yes, the guy who Insisted on following a very literal interpretation of the comment is pointing out how off base someone else is.

33 posted on 06/04/2015 2:08:29 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Yes, the guy who Insisted on following a very literal interpretation of the comment is pointing out how off base someone else is.

This from the guy who insists it's as mathematically predictable as radiometric decay.

34 posted on 06/04/2015 2:10:55 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
This from the guy who insists it's as mathematically predictable as radiometric decay.

It's as UNPREDICTABLE as radioactive decay.

But we've been over this.

35 posted on 06/04/2015 2:20:47 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
But we've been over this.

Yup.

The general principle is held to be self-evidently true, because exceptions must be disregarded and conclusions based on instances where it is found to be true.

36 posted on 06/04/2015 2:30:18 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
The general principle is held to be self-evidently true, because exceptions must be disregarded and conclusions based on instances where it is found to be true.

You Libertarians are fond of your misrepresentations and double talk, i'll give you that.

37 posted on 06/04/2015 2:32:55 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
You Libertarians are fond of your misrepresentations and double talk, i'll give you that.

So would Alinsky.

38 posted on 06/04/2015 2:40:32 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. The facts are in, the gateway theory is bunk. If you continue to use it you’re just a liar. Of course we knew that already.


39 posted on 06/04/2015 3:29:03 PM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: discostu
You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. The facts are in, the gateway theory is bunk. If you continue to use it you’re just a liar. Of course we knew that already.

A D@mn I do not give regarding your opinion of the gateway theory. I have the best reference sources that it is in fact true. I have much experience in the drug culture, and every addlepated drug addict I have ever spoke with started out with weed.

You have no business talking to anyone about "Facts" with your made up bullsh*t libertarian agenda pushing crap.

40 posted on 06/04/2015 7:25:49 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson