Posted on 05/19/2015 7:40:39 PM PDT by Altariel
As it often happens, a competition between companies had benefitted the consumer. Purina was bent on catching Blue Buffalo in an advertising lie they claimed they never used poultry by-product meal in their foods.
However, Purina did some testing of Blue Buffalo product and found that was not the case and sued them for False Advertising. Just last week, a year after the case was filed, Blue Buffalo admitted to using by product meal in a substantial and material portion of their pet food. (www.petfoodhonesty.com)
Blue Buffalo asked the Court for additional time to file an Amended Complaint in the litigation, naming its ingredient suppliers as Defendants.
Despite this admission, Blue Buffalo still has not informed consumers of the presence of poultry by-product meal in Blue Buffalo pet food, refuses to accept responsibility for the product it sold, and is instead blaming its suppliers, said Keith Schopp, a spokesperson for Nestlé Purina Petcare.
On May 6, 2014, Purina filed a lawsuit against Blue Buffalo for false advertising after testing revealed the presence of poultry by-product meal in some of Blue Buffalos top selling pet foods. Blue Buffalos CEO responded by immediately claiming the testing was Voodoo Science and assuring their customers that Blue Buffalo does not use chicken by-product meal or poultry by-product meal in any of our products.
According to Schopp, Only when faced with undeniable evidence from the lawsuit has Blue Buffalo admitted the truth to the court: a substantial and material portion of Blue Buffalo pet food sold over the past several years contained poultry by-product meal. It is unclear to us if or when this practice stopped, or whether any Blue Buffalo pet food containing by-product meal is still on store shelves.
No small company, it is estimated that Blue Buffalo sells over a billion dollars of pet food at retail and well over 10 million bags annually.
Through a $50 million annual advertising campaign that flooded airwaves and pet food aisles alike, Blue Buffalo told consumers over and over, emphatically and without qualification, that its products never contain poultry by-product meal, said Schopp.
Blue Buffalo also attacked big name pet food companies, insinuating that they were somehow misleading consumers. Consumers paid a hefty premium for Blue Buffalo products based on these claims.
Yet none of these claims were true, said Schopp.
Schopp added: Blue Buffalo now claims it had no way of knowing the bags contained by-product meal. A manufacturer is responsible for knowing whats in its product, and a simple audit of its supply chain would have revealed what we discovered after reviewing the documentation.
Blue Buffalo owes consumers an apology for all the false statements, false labels, and false advertising. More than this, it is time for Blue Buffalo to be transparent with the public and prove to their pet parents that no mislabeled product remains on shelves.
Why You Should Care
Even if you dont feed your dog Blue Buffalo, this should bring to light something very serious: how do you know if your dog food is what the label says it is?
Blue Buffalo has been around a long time and has always professed they were by-product free, as do many high-priced, premium pet foods.
Regulatory oversight of pet food is very limited no one tests or checks ingredients, explains Susan Thixton, Pet Food Consumer Advocate and founder of TruthAboutPetFood.com. Regulatory people tell me they dont have the time or the funding to test products or ingredients. As with this instance, the only way consumers found out about the problem is from a pet food competitor testing products.
And if, no one is checking .
I would assume this goes on all the time, she adds. When any company knows the chances of them getting caught are one in a million, the temptation to cut corners might be irresistible. Needless to say, we need improved oversight of this industry.
So you are paying for high-dollar chicken but what exactly are you getting instead?
According to Thixton:
The legal definition of a poultry by-product meal is: consists of the ground, rendered, clean parts of the carcass of slaughtered poultry, such as necks, feet, undeveloped eggs, and intestines, exclusive of feathers. The legal definition of poultry meal is: the dry rendered product from a combination of clean flesh and skin with or without accompanying bone, derived from the parts of whole carcasses of poultry or a combination thereof, exclusive of feathers, heads, feet, and entrails.
And while she adds there is no scientific evidence (to her knowledge) that by-product is bad for your dog, its certainly not the organic, all natural, free range, etc., that some of these pet food companies tells you are paying top dollar for. So How Do You Know You are Getting Your Moneys Worth?
Thixton says you need to ASK. Here are the important ones:
What is the country of origin of all ingredients? Are meat and vegetable ingredients sourced from USDA inspected and approved human edible ingredients?
She warns that many companies will provide only partial answers such as they will respond that meats and vegetables are sourced from the US but will not disclose the country of origin of supplements (often sourced from China). A consumer wants complete answers my suggestion is to keep asking questions.
Its a good reason to go homemade, of course. But, if you cant do that, check out Thixtonss list of safe pet foods that have been tested and ranked by her independent, consumer funded organization.
Doggie ping and kitty ping
I thought ‘Purina’s ‘Beneful’ dog food was causing a number of deaths to dogs?
I’m not a Blue fan - my dogs have all been raised on Iams. Long lives, shiny coats, cold, wet noses for many, many years. :)
I have been feeding Blue Buffalo grain free senior food to my German shepherd (along with raw ground meat) for the past three years and have had no problems.
One of my previous German shepherds was fed Purina Pro Pet Plan and he had nothing but health issues.
I figured the craze has gone far enough when I saw a bag of dog food the other day that claimed its contents were made from white meat chicken.
They forgot to list that the main ingredient was bull schnitt.
I have been feeding my dogs Purina Pro-Plan for years. They have all lived years beyond my expectations. Doesn’t get better than that.
I once read a veterinary manual on inspecting carcasses for edibility and learned that there are animal diseases that render carcasses unfit for human consumption, but still considered suitable for animal food. Other animal diseases render carcasses unfit for consumption by anything. You know your pet won't get meat that is tagged inedible, but I don't know how you could know if it is getting something that's barely healthy enough to be considered animal food.
Not a problem in my house. When Andy Cat tried Blue Buffalo, he practically spit it in my face. No amount of urging would get him to down a single bite. I took the expensive stuff back to the store for a full refund.
Andy really likes Purina Beyond canned and dry food. It’s the most expensive supermarket brand, but less than the stuff in the pet store. And when Purina says No Corn, No Soy, No Wheat, I believe them.
Interesting. We moved to Blue Buffalo a year ago adding a little Purina in the mix. Westie picks out the stuff she doesn’t like and leaves it on the floor.
Thanks for the link.
There is a lot more going on here than meets the eye. BB AND Nestle were burned by the same supplier which adulterated its product. BB caught it and fessed up. Nestle did not.
It is probably relevant that BB has grown as Nestles market share has fallen.
We will just have to let it shake out in court.
I have never heard that and have fed my four legged family members Beneful for many years with zero problems. One, an American Eskimo, lived over 19 years.
Anyone else read Dr. Becker on www.Mercola.com?
Yet another reason I make my own cat food. I have a pair of elder cats who’ve been eating my homemade blend for years, and they are healthy, happy, energetic, involved, have incredibly healthy coats, and are just at the right weight.
I started his because my boy cat was going to die from losing weight from vomiting and diarrhea from being allergic to something in the commercial food, which was actually supposed to be a good one, containing no grains or by-products (according to the label). My girl cat was a slug and overweight.
The homemade diet fixed all of this within weeks. I’ve never looked back.
This makes me so angry. My dog had to have surgery 2 1/2 years ago to remove bladder stones and she told me it was the type of dog food we had been feeding him (Purina dog chow). She recommended blue buffalo and I have been biting it every since thinking I was doing the right thing for my dogs.
I’m not litigious, but I’m seriously thinking of looking into the class action law suit.
I’ve since switched to Taste of the Wild. I hope they’re not lying about their ingredients
Don't see why not. If the chickens were organic, all natural, free range, etc. then so are their byproducts.
Dogs in the wild eat the entire animal. They don't slice off the meat and throw away the icky parts.
I use Fromm for the dry food mixed with canned Wellness various flavors for the last couple of years. The Blue Buffalo was giving my cross-bred Irish wolfhound very loose stools at least twice a week. He’s had no similar issues since I switched to Fromm, it’s not widely availabe but worth trying if you can find it...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.