Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Is that lawyer who I think it is?


1 posted on 12/12/2014 10:59:03 AM PST by Citizen Zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Citizen Zed

Just to please the mob?


2 posted on 12/12/2014 11:00:21 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

One of my stupid in-laws committed an armed robbery with a pellet pistol. He was caught and charged just as if it were real.


4 posted on 12/12/2014 11:04:17 AM PST by umgud (I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed
Cleveland boy's death in police shooting declared homicide

Duh! It wasn't natural causes or an accident. One person killed another therefore it was a homicide. If someone breaks into my house and threatens to kill me and I shoot him it is a justifiable homicide. The coroner doesn't make ruling on whether the killing was justified, just that it happened and what evidence can be obtained from the body.

5 posted on 12/12/2014 11:04:24 AM PST by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

Of course it’s a “homicide.” Any killing is a homicide. A homicide may or may not be a crime depending on the circumstances. Not really news IMO.

The question is, was the homicide criminal.


6 posted on 12/12/2014 11:04:50 AM PST by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed
Yes.

Big kid. Adds a little context.

7 posted on 12/12/2014 11:04:51 AM PST by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed
I saw a photo of the gun he was waving.Even close up it looked surprisingly real.At a distance I'll bet it looked even more real.From what I've seen there should be no criminal charges or financial compensation for the family.Yes,it was sad...but it was nothing more than,and nothing less than,a kid who didn't know what he was doing.

Tragic...but not actionable.Criminally *or* civilly.

8 posted on 12/12/2014 11:05:17 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Jimmy Carter;No Longer The Worst President In My Lifetime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

5’7” and 195 pounds is a very big 12 year old. I’m not defending the officer but he probably didn’t look like a young boy playing with a toy gun. With the hysteria that always follows mass shootings the officer could have felt a great deal of anxiety and pressure to protect everyone at the park.


10 posted on 12/12/2014 11:05:34 AM PST by NorthstarMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

Of course it was homicide...the kid didn’t shoot himself.


15 posted on 12/12/2014 11:07:28 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed
Of course it is a homicide.

More specifically, it is called JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE.

(In our state we have both excusable homicide and justifiable homicide....the latter being when the state executes a prisoner, cops shooting a fleeing felon, etc.)

18 posted on 12/12/2014 11:09:04 AM PST by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

It was nice knowing you, Cleveland!

While this was obviously an accident, this is just going to become another excuse for a “shopping spree” when a grand jury rules that way.


27 posted on 12/12/2014 11:13:00 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed
The 911 caller could tell it was a kid with a toy. A passerby walked right by the kid who was waiving the toy around.

The only people who COULDN'T tell it was a kid with a toy were the “highly trained” gubbermint workers in blue uniforms who showed up on the scene blasting away.

And we're supposed to trust our personal safety to these clown?

28 posted on 12/12/2014 11:14:05 AM PST by Fido969 (What's sad is most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

Of course its a homicide. The question is whether or not it was justifiable.


29 posted on 12/12/2014 11:15:18 AM PST by VOR78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

Cop showed up and according to reports of eye witnesses the cop got out of the car and shot him within two seconds. But then, did the kid point that gun at the cop? That’s the question the DA will bring up.


31 posted on 12/12/2014 11:16:45 AM PST by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

“Loehmann, who was identified as having fired the shots that killed Rice, joined Cleveland’s police force in March 2014. Previously, he spent five months in 2012 with the police department in Independence, Ohio, about 13 miles south of Cleveland, four of which were spent in the police academy. According to his personnel records, released by the city of Independence in the aftermath of the shooting, his supervisors described him as an emotionally unstable recruit with a demonstrable “lack of maturity” and an “inability to perform basic functions as instructed”, specifically citing an incident that occurred during a weapons training exercise.

An internal memo sent by Independence Police Department’s deputy chief to the city’s human resources manager described Loehmann as visibly “distracted and weepy” during gun range training and exhibiting a dismal performance in handling his gun, calling the incident a “dangerous loss of composure”. The memo concluded, “Individually, these events would not be considered major situations, but when taken together they show a pattern of a lack of maturity, indiscretion and not following instructions, I do not believe time, nor training, will be able to change or correct these deficiencies.”


33 posted on 12/12/2014 11:17:34 AM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

This was just a TERRIBLE accident. I have no doubt in my mind that officer would take that shot back, if he could.

I gotta say though, with or without the orange plastic on them, I could EASILY spot a toy gun. Of course, I wasn’t there, and I have no idea what the lighting was like, or how the boy was acting with it.

Just tragic.


37 posted on 12/12/2014 11:19:45 AM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

Well, DUH! It IS a homocide. The question is whether it was justified or not.


46 posted on 12/12/2014 11:27:12 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

Decisions, decisions:

Roll up close enough to the person with the reported gun to potentially intimidate him and keep him from attacking civilians, or pull up far enough away to reduce his chance of hitting the cops if he shoots at them but reduce the chance of responding in time if he shoots at someone else.

Shoot when a suspicious kid who hid the object of interest in his waistband pulls the gun-like object from his waistband, after being warned by police, or wait and see what he decides to do with that gun-like object when two police lives and multiple civilian lives may be at risk. How much time do the police have if the object reported as a gun and being treated as a gun turns out to be a gun and the suspect decides to shoot?

Decisions are tough things, especially when there is little time. Whether the shooting was criminal is obvious - it was not. Whether the actions were good police work is a decision for the law enforcement chain of command, not for those of us who don’t have all the facts.


48 posted on 12/12/2014 11:28:12 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

Tamir Rice, who was black,

EVERYTIME! without fail...

wheres the unarmed word??

Unarmed Black Infant ?


50 posted on 12/12/2014 11:28:35 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed

Benny Benjamin Crump yes thats Him!!


52 posted on 12/12/2014 11:30:25 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Citizen Zed
... responding to a call of a suspect waving a handgun around in a Cleveland park.

Apparently, someone else thought it was a real gun, since that person called the police or 911 to report "a suspect waving a handgun around."
64 posted on 12/12/2014 11:47:08 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson