Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Something About The Way She Died Part 2
BirtherReport.com ^ | November 10, 2014 | Linda Jordan

Posted on 11/11/2014 3:16:35 PM PST by ethical

Something About The Way She Died Part 2 by Linda Jordan

On January 6, 2014 we were told that Hawaii Department of Health Director Loretta Fuddy, a central player in the production of Barack Obama’s controversial birth certificate , died from cardiac arrhythmia after the small plane she was in had to make an emergency ocean landing.

In September 2014 a recently discovered report, from a Maui Police Detective, revealed that Fuddy’s heart wasn't the problem after all. The Medical Examiner concluded she had drowned, in spite of the fact that all witness accounts say she was in a life jacket that kept her afloat.

Now, it’s November 2014 and I have just reviewed a debriefing report from a Commander with the United States Coast Guard (USCG) who was part of the rescue effort after the ocean ditching. This report says that Loretta Fuddy died from “severe internal injuries”.

I include the relevant part of the debriefing below.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: butterdezillion; death; forgery; fuddy; mishigas; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamasarkancide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-431 next last
To: butterdezillion
There was not a plot to murder Fuddy. There was a plot to staqe her death so they could whisk her away under a new identity, supposedly in order to protect her - a “potential state witness”.

That’s why HRS 841-3 was not in effect. There was NO DEATH within a HI county’s jurisdiction.

So... no death. Loretta Fuddy is still alive and in hiding.

Then why, oh why, is there any drama about missing footwear and confusing autopsy reports when there is no dead body???

Or are you claiming that some random body was autopsied?

Or were they supposed to spirit Fuddy away but things went wrong and she ended up dying?

If she didn't die, how on earth did they stage an open casket funeral? Were the television stations and hundreds of attendees in on the conspiracy? Were they complicit, bribed, or threatened?

This has to be the lamest, most convoluted conspiracy conceivable.

101 posted on 11/12/2014 10:00:54 AM PST by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; butterdezillion
Wow. Hell of a prize you're working for there.

Think a bunch of us have figured out what "prize" you're working on around here, L'il Buckaroo.
Your act is getting real old and damn boring.

102 posted on 11/12/2014 10:01:59 AM PST by The Cajun (Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Maybe you should do something about it, Spunky.


103 posted on 11/12/2014 10:03:03 AM PST by humblegunner (Why hello, Captain Trips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Maybe you should do something about it, Spunky.

Ain't my job or within my power on this forum to do something about it L'il Buckaroo, just pointing out your continued crap.

104 posted on 11/12/2014 10:08:24 AM PST by The Cajun (Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
You really buy into all this crazy crap?

Just damn. I knew you were a butthole but I never figured you for stupid.

Another illusion dashed to bits upon the rocks of reality.

105 posted on 11/12/2014 10:10:21 AM PST by humblegunner (Why hello, Captain Trips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
You really buy into all this crazy crap?
Just damn. I knew you were a butthole but I never figured you for stupid.

Not hardly, but there remains many unanswered questions about what really happened with the Fuddy death and circumstances.
Someone wants to speculate, good for them, someone wants to dig into contradictory statements, good for them.

Am I satisfied with the "official" answers, no.

Like I've told you before, your Alinsky tactics don't work on me, plus you're too simple and obvious to use them properly.

106 posted on 11/12/2014 10:19:46 AM PST by The Cajun (Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I’m not avoiding the question - you are making an assertion and trying to hold me to your conclusions. I’m saying that the shoes and socks and bracelet could have been removed after she was brought ashore. And it is possible that she was undressed from her soaking wet clothing and examined after being brought to shore. For example, was she still wearing the soaking wet clothing while lying on the gurney at the “care home”. Or for the time she was at the Molakai General Hospital pending autopsy. That’s where a preliminary cause of death could for drowning might have occurred. You do not know when she was undressed.

BTW, HRS §841-13 says that the victims personal effects “may” be recovered and held for evidence, not “must” be recovered and held for evidence. Given the set of circumstances in this case, it is not hard to image the police not considering her clothing as evidence.

Unlike you, I’m not accusing anyone of anything. I’m only pointing out that there are alternatives to the missing items that don’t involve massive conspiracies.


107 posted on 11/12/2014 10:21:05 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

No. It is you and the people who played alonq with your obfuscation on that who have lost credibility. With every new piece of information that Linda or I come out with, there is more eqq on your face, and we’ve only just bequn.

You did the Alinsky thinq to scare the earnest people away from the threads I was on. It was a despicable show of childishness and it’s cost more than you probably even know. But outside of Free Republic a lot of people are wakinq up. And wonderinq what the heck is wronq with Free Republic.

You are so interested in ridiculinq me and convincinq the world that little people are powerless, that you refuse to look at the FACT that the Maui County Police Chief said there was NO DEATH within Maui County jurisdiction. Facts be damned, all you are concerned about is that I and my other hobbit colleaques don’t qet the biq idea that our lives exist for a reason and we can actually make a difference. Why is it so critical for you to undermine one of the very foundational tenets of both conservatism and Christianity? I’m a nobody in your eyes and that’s fine. But I’ve qot a biq God who has fouqht a qiant with a slinq and a stone and spoken truth to power throuqh a donkey - and said if His unwillinq people wouldn’t praise His name the very rocks would shout! What and who I am is no biq deal, but if you want to tell God that He cannot use a David, or an ass, or a stone.... or a Nellie.... then your battle is with the Lord, not with me. And that’s a fiqht you should really think twice about.

I’ve qot a couple dozen colleaques who have been faithfully pluqqinq away. Some are visible, some aren’t, but they all matter. Every one. I’ve read to the end of the Book. The hobbits win, thouqh for a time it looks they can’t possibly win. I have no reason to cut people down for beinq hobbits like me, and I have no reason to cut myself down or let you cut any of us down. God uses the lowly thinqs of the world to shame the wise. He uses the most horrific instrument of torture to brinq about salvation for all who will simply receive it. I refuse to despise the small thinqs of this world, because if it’s qood enouqh for God to use, it’s qood enouqh for me. Even if it’s little ol’ me.


108 posted on 11/12/2014 10:24:01 AM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

The only birth facts that are Article II, Section 1 relevant are documenting age 35 or older and place of birth.
Dr. Onaka verified the Obama birth facts to the satisfaction of the Arizona and Kansas Secretaries of State who are the only officials that I know of who actually have asked him to verify the Obama birth facts.
If anyone still has questions about Dr. Onaka’s verifications, he can be deposed or subpoenaed and called to testify under oath in state or federal legislative hearings. He can also be court ordered by a judge to produce the original birth certificate for inspection.
Dr. Onaka is also a named defendant in the Mississippi ballot challenge lawsuit but the federal judge who is hearing that lawsuit has not acted on pre-trial motions in more than two and a half years now.

I’ll be interested to hear those “real reasons” that Loretta Fuddy would have information that her predecessor as Director of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino wouldn’t have.


109 posted on 11/12/2014 10:31:02 AM PST by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: All

Okay, I’ve read the entire thread and I’ve got it figured out. There is a small group of posters—the usual group—that is telling the rest of us—the conservatives—for maybe the millionth time what our problem is. Namely, we don’t trust government enough. In particular, we don’t trust Democrat-dominated state & federal governments enough, though we are also too suspicious of state governments with a smattering of RINI/GOPe officials.

The message is, the above types of governments are honest. They are trustworthy. They do not lie. They are transparent. They always do what is best for the citizens, including conservatives. They never favor Democrats, liberals or the Establishment. They always favor integrity and The People. The government is good, honest, aboveboard and reliable. This is the message the little group of pernicious posters has been trying to drive home for years. If only the hicks and the rubes would listen, all would be well.

After all, no government, state or fed, and particularly no government dominated by Dems and a few RINOs and GOPe-ers, has ever given us any cause to doubt it. Over and over we’ve seen what paragons of virtue Dem politicians are, closely followed by the righteousness of RINOs and GOPe-ers. How many times do these governments have to prove that they NEVER lie, cover-up, play favorites, obfuscate or do any other less than totally integrous thing before the wingnuts will stop acting stupidly. Only really stupid people believe Obama has lied about anything of significance. Only crazy people believe his cohorts in Dem-dominated state governments would support his lies.

The bottom line is this. We have a small but vocal group that believes in Dem-dominated governments, state & fed. They believe when such governments speak, it is the Gold Standard. No one can/should ask further questions. All questions have been resolved. The Dems, who never lie, have laid the matter to rest once and for all. If stupid, crazy conservatives would just learn that lesson, our sturdy little group of Dem government cheerleaders could finally take a much deserved rest.


110 posted on 11/12/2014 10:53:20 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ethical

“You can’t report that someone died from severe internal injuries simply by flying over the crash site.”

Actually people make faulty statements all the time. He appears to me to have made some assumptions.

“In this case the Maui Police Department would conduct the investigation on behalf of the coroner, absent the autopsy, per HRS 841-3.”

The investigation appears to me to include two lines of inquiry:

A) cause of engine failure
B) cause of death

NTSB is handling A and the autopsy resolved B. Had either line of inquiry turned up any evidence of a crime than further lines of inquiry would be opened.

“I don’t see Fuddy in these images. Other passengers have said she was floating fine in her life jacket. The USCG said they found her floating in her life jacket.”

Are you saying that you don’t see a person lying next to the man on the left or are you saying that you can’t positively identify the person pedaling their feet as Director Fuddy? If the former then you should watch the entire video. If the latter, then I have to agree that no one can say for 100% certainty that the person is Director Fuddy. But that person does appear to fit the known facts for Director Fuddy. And that person in the video is not floating fine in her lift vest.

Deputy Director Keith Yamamoto who was next to her in the water says she was having trouble relaxing and staying calm. Isn’t anxiety one of the symptoms of a heart arrhythmia?

People can drown even while wearing a life vest, especially if it not being worn properly.


111 posted on 11/12/2014 11:37:16 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ConstantSkeptic; butterdezillion

Exactly.

Why would the Maui PD Chief confirm to her that no one died in the waters off Molokai, if all of this was a plot to cover up that Director Fuddy had been spirited away? Why wouldn’t he just say they did an investigation? Why wouldn’t he just put up a fake investigation results? According to Butter, all the passengers and the pilot are in on it, why not get fake sworn statements?

Her own evidence that this is a conspiracy contradicts her.

If this accident had not involved Director Fuddy, I image the documentation on it would be exactly the same as it is now.


112 posted on 11/12/2014 12:07:44 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

I would like to recommend a solution for the partisan political concerns expressed by Fantasywriter: the appointment of a Select House of Representatives Committee on Presidential Eligibility similar to the Select Committee on the Benghazi Attacks. I would recommend former prosecutor, Congressman Trey Gowdy to Chair that Select Committee but he’s already chairing the Benghazi Committee. There are many other members of the House who have impeccable conservative credentials and prior experience as prosecutors who could both chair and serve on such a committee. Congressional committee chairs have subpoena power to compel testimony under oath. A congressional committee also has the ability to investigate any and all relevant aspects of determining if Obama is truly eligible for the office he holds: from identity theft, to document forgery to the cause of death of Loretta Fuddy.
Yes, there would be Democrats on a Select Committee, but they would be in the minority and without enough votes to determine the direction or outcome of the investigation.
In my humble opinion, this should have been done years ago, in 2011 when the Republicans first took control of the House of Representatives.


113 posted on 11/12/2014 12:18:30 PM PST by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Who were you before you adopted the Nero Germanicus screenname? Your posting style is SOOO familiar. It’s like
I’ve been reading the exact same posts for five or so years, but the NG persona hasn’t been here that long.

Who were you before?


114 posted on 11/12/2014 12:24:03 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
The real purpose was to keep her from ever beinq able to testify after the CCP reveals what they’ve qot.

And when is that going to be?

115 posted on 11/12/2014 1:27:32 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Yes, failing to buy the latest crap that comes down the road makes one a troll.
By god we should believe anything! Because we should!


116 posted on 11/12/2014 1:29:16 PM PST by humblegunner (Why hello, Captain Trips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Did you misunderstand my post on purpose, or was that really the best you could do?


117 posted on 11/12/2014 1:38:51 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
Like I've told you before, your Alinsky tactics don't work on me

Probably because you were born before Alinsky invented mockery.
He's really scary, with all that inventing mockery and such.

That mess never existed before he thought it up.

Isn't that right? And any lunatic garbage that comes down the road should be respected, right?

Never mocked.. oh no.. because Alinsky invented that shit, right?

118 posted on 11/12/2014 3:05:10 PM PST by humblegunner (Why hello, Captain Trips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
It ain't just mockery L'il Buckaroo, but you know that, LOL!

Deflection and obfuscation is your stock and trade.

And any lunatic garbage that comes down the road should be respected, right?

Hell L'il Buckaroo, I respect you in no way.

because Alinsky invented that sXXt, right?

Been drinking again L'il Buckaroo?

119 posted on 11/12/2014 3:19:07 PM PST by The Cajun (Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
It is you and the people who played alonq with your obfuscation on that who have lost credibility.

Sorry, sweetie. I never put forth an opinion about stuff I can't know anything about.
You did, though. More than once. All crazy and all wrong.

With every new piece of information that Linda or I come out with, there is more eqq on your face, and we’ve only just bequn.

Well, hurry up then.. expose that stuff!
Posting it on a birther blog don't cut it.

You did the Alinsky thinq to scare the earnest people away from the threads

I did? The threads are still there, nothing is stopping people from seeing them.

But outside of Free Republic a lot of people are wakinq up.

FReepers are ate-up with the dumbass! So why do you bother with us?

You are so interested in ridiculinq me

I admit, it's fun and easy.

I’ve qot a biq God who has fouqht a qiant with a slinq and a stone and spoken truth to power throuqh a donkey

Yeah, you need to be institutionalized.

I’ve qot a couple dozen colleaques who have been faithfully pluqqinq away.

And what exactly has come of all this pluqqing?

120 posted on 11/12/2014 3:24:23 PM PST by humblegunner (Why hello, Captain Trips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-431 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson