“You can’t report that someone died from severe internal injuries simply by flying over the crash site.”
Actually people make faulty statements all the time. He appears to me to have made some assumptions.
“In this case the Maui Police Department would conduct the investigation on behalf of the coroner, absent the autopsy, per HRS 841-3.”
The investigation appears to me to include two lines of inquiry:
A) cause of engine failure
B) cause of death
NTSB is handling A and the autopsy resolved B. Had either line of inquiry turned up any evidence of a crime than further lines of inquiry would be opened.
“I don’t see Fuddy in these images. Other passengers have said she was floating fine in her life jacket. The USCG said they found her floating in her life jacket.”
Are you saying that you don’t see a person lying next to the man on the left or are you saying that you can’t positively identify the person pedaling their feet as Director Fuddy? If the former then you should watch the entire video. If the latter, then I have to agree that no one can say for 100% certainty that the person is Director Fuddy. But that person does appear to fit the known facts for Director Fuddy. And that person in the video is not floating fine in her lift vest.
Deputy Director Keith Yamamoto who was next to her in the water says she was having trouble relaxing and staying calm. Isn’t anxiety one of the symptoms of a heart arrhythmia?
People can drown even while wearing a life vest, especially if it not being worn properly.
Actually, Keith Yamamoto has spoken to nobody. Nobody questioned him because the MCPD - which would have had jurisdiction if Fuddy was truly dead - says there was NO DEATH within their jurisdiction.
Yamamoto could be fined for not reportinq under oath the circumstances of Fuddy’s death as he knew them..... if HRS 841-3 had been in effect...
It is clear you did not read the article and citations. All the points you bring up are debunked there.