Posted on 04/21/2014 4:04:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
Scientists have suggested the exodus from Africa started between 40,000 and 70,000 years ago. However, stone artifacts dating to at least 100,000 years ago that were recently uncovered in the Arabian Desert suggested that modern humans might have begun their march across the globe earlier than once suspected.
Out of Africa modelsTo help solve this mystery, Katerina Harvati, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Tübingen in Germany, and her colleagues tested four competing out-of-Africa models.
(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...
Part of that is coverage, i.e., straw men, the rest is careerism. Science is a method, not a body of knowledge.
LOL
“He’s the world’s greatest lumberjack, and he just got here from the Sahara Forest.”
“You mean the Sahara Desert?”
“Sure — now!”
See Jim’s up there:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3147073/posts?page=10#10
and Alas Babylon!’s
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3147073/posts?page=14#14
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3147073/posts?page=17#17
And thanks, I’m filing that again. :’) I think I lost it last time.
Political Science.
I am suspicious of the out of Africa theories, They are too convenient for the left-politically correct.
There are other theories such as SE Asia also being a place for human origins. My opinion is these theories are based on thin evidence and are perpetrated to get Federale government grants
I've often considered that the Red Sea was completely dry. The Mediterranen would have seriously decreased water levels then.
Eerything changed about 7,500 years ago
Thanks, me too!
Another intellectual heard from.
Earliest recorded history of white flight.
-=0=-
The above average intellect gene. Who knew?
Bucky Fuller believed in the out-of-south-asia proposition.
And there are finds in Australia that come close to pre-dating anything in Africa...
There can't be. Science is open-ended and new discoveries or evidence can change a theoretical model in an instant. Consensus is a term that should never be applied to the scientific method.
I’ll let the “scientists” play around twisting their mustaches and batting each other’s arses.
Just takes a child looking at Google Earth to tell that there was once just one big Super Continent. Something happended and it was broken up and spread out.
Anything in our history books that might explain any of what is clearly seen?
Yeah, a child could come to that conclusion if sufficiently misled.
The problem with whole thing is, there’s nothing but morphology to go on, and the existence of fossils in a few places in Africa doesn’t mean there are no fossils elsewhere, nor does it mean that there was no one living anywhere else who just died and failed to leave fossils. :’)
Listen, Bub, it’s all roads lead out of Africa or you lose your funding and we strip you of all your degrees. Got it!?
AKA dance with the one whut brung ya.
Can you blame them for leaving, considering the Blood Diamonds, Ebola, AIDS, Colonialism, corrupt government, Islamic Slavery, and God knows what else, was on its way there?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.