Posted on 06/07/2013 8:39:41 AM PDT by Jacquerie
Conservatives tout the importance of the traditional family to our society. Father, mother, children, the family is the building block, the foundation of society. This isnt news to any civilization. Radical Leftists tell us it doesnt matter. A family is whatever one or two or more people of any sex wish it to be. After almost fifty years of the Great Society, in which many fathers were replaced with a monthly stipend to mothers, we conservatives know the results. Directionless, violent and barbaric boys grow into felonious men. Absent the proven institution, the structure of traditional marriage, women still have babies, but our culture and civilization suffer. We know this.
Focus on the importance of structure, and apply it to political science, to American history.
In 1776, thirteen American colonies declared independence. Just a few months before the last great battle of the ensuing war, in March 1781, they formalized a quasi-government under the Articles of Confederation. By 1787, it was clear enough the Union was dissolving. The structure of the Articles was insufficient to provide good government. Twelve of the thirteen states sent delegates to a convention to correct its inherent, structural problems. After a summer of effort, they devised a new plan ratified by the people of eleven states within a year.
Structure. There was little difference between the morals and attitudes of the people who drafted the Articles and the Constitution. Indeed, some of the same men who signed the Articles, also signed the Constitution. What changed was the structure of the American government.
The American Union, teetering back on its heels under the Articles, thrived when released by the Constitution. The more perfect union of the Constitution set the stage for freedom and prosperity. A largely agricultural backwater in 1789 grew to become a solid second tier industrial and economic powerhouse in less than a hundred years.
Structure. Just as non-traditional families are unnatural and destructive, the Articles of Confederation demonstrated that governments not sufficiently divided into their natural functions were inherently unstable and ineffective. The American Constitutional Union, like the timeless husband/wife/children familial structure, recognized the natural structure of free government.
That natural structure meant separation of powers, and not just the civics class horizontal legislative/executive/judicial. The first, and most important separation was the vertical division of powers between the federal government and states, as enforced by a Senate of the States. In this all important structure, state participation meant a federal government and court system well-confined to enumerated powers and one that respected the Tenth Amendment.
Structure is destiny. The 17th Amendment removed the states from the federal government. In their stead, it created another popularly elected body. Make no mistake, the new Senate beginning in 1913 is a monster, a political Frankenstein that combines the worst of long termed popularly elected politicians with incredible power tied to the executive branch.
As the modern Left redefined and corrupted the natural order, the structure of family, the Left of a hundred years ago did the same to federated, free government. Restoration of republican freedom is impossible without rebuilding the Framers structure, and that requires a Senate of the States. The 17th must go.
You’re doing great work. Ignore the critics. They’re nobodies doing nothing. You’re changing the way people think.
Another boot lick has spoken.
That is rich.....
Yes, we're well aware you lick the boot of your state government overlords. No need to remind us.
>> Conservative activists from Illinois That is rich..... <<
I guess you missed the news about the "progressives" in Illinois being unable to pass gay marriage in this state despite having a veto proof majority in both of both houses of their gerrymandered legislature. Guess who stopped it? It sure wasn't the conservative activists from Virginia who can't stop their allegedly "conservative" state from voting for Obama.
Who was it, then?
If I were from Illinois, wait I would leave that hell hole.....
And I believed I’d be better served by politicians appointing my Senators for me, I’d move to Canada.
Actually, I think he is Dan Proft
He is also the ILLINOIS FREE REPUBLIC PING master, saw it on a Post
He is supposed to PING The ILLINOIS list”
I do not suggest that any Californian try this. Boxer has such a rate of staff turnover that no one around her knows anything ... and neither does she. Feinstein? Well she is somewhat higher on the IQ scale than Boxer, (a) that ain't difficult (b) and not by much.
America has come to this: we think we need our elected ani to help us deal with bureaucracies that should not exist.
Novel concept: a modern state should be able to function oppressively enough on a budget of a maximum of 15% of GNP. We are at 22+% and climbing.
Year after that, cut another 2-3%. Let the chips fall where they may.
Strange that he has a blank FReeper page and no state identifier. That tends to set off alarm bells with me.
In the Federalists they asset the importance of the different bodies of government having different characters of design and influence. The 17th allowed for popular appointments of both sections of the legislature, which was against the founder’s well thought out design of government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.