Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: nickcarraway
2 posted on
12/03/2012 12:14:17 PM PST by
Michael.SF.
(Obama lied, Stevens died.)
To: nickcarraway
This cannot be true. They haven’t factored me into their comparison.
3 posted on
12/03/2012 12:15:25 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: nickcarraway
it is called: “researching the competition.”
4 posted on
12/03/2012 12:15:45 PM PST by
PGR88
To: nickcarraway
5 posted on
12/03/2012 12:17:28 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(Working is for suckers.)
To: nickcarraway
7 posted on
12/03/2012 12:18:50 PM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: nickcarraway
Fact is, women are jealous as sin of attractive women.
They aren't admiring them. They are hating on them.
9 posted on
12/03/2012 12:21:44 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
To: nickcarraway
Women look at other women more because they like to size up the competition. Hetero women don’t mind looking at or being touched by each other — quite unlike hetero men.
Also, women are more interesting to look at than men, aren’t they?
10 posted on
12/03/2012 12:21:44 PM PST by
walford
(http://natural-law-natural-religion.blogspot.com/)
To: nickcarraway
I guess Van Morrison had it about right in Wild Nights:
The wild night is calling.
And all the girls walk by
Dressed up for each other...
To: nickcarraway
14 posted on
12/03/2012 12:27:12 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
To: nickcarraway
Proves what...if you see a picture of Kate Middleton and hubby......of course a woman looks at Kate....but with no sexual connotations,.....the lovely clothes, her grace, etc...
Most testing is geared to produce a specific answer. We're not idiots..
To: nickcarraway
"This is counter-intuitive from a sexual perspective if you are thinking about desire" Counterintuative from a Darwinian feminist perspective, but not from a rational conservative perspective. It all goes back to capitalistic desires - maximizing shareholder returns.
19 posted on
12/03/2012 12:41:17 PM PST by
uncommonsense
(Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
To: nickcarraway
Young also women ogle themselves at every opportunity. If you mounted a mirror at street level on the side of a building in Manhattan, around 90% of the young women walking by would check themselves out. They wouldn’t use the mirror as a sly way to check out if any threats are walking behind them, they would just check out themselves.
20 posted on
12/03/2012 12:42:32 PM PST by
Reeses
To: nickcarraway
Duhhhh, and they actually spent money on this?
21 posted on
12/03/2012 12:43:25 PM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
(Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
To: nickcarraway
22 posted on
12/03/2012 12:45:19 PM PST by
dfwgator
To: nickcarraway
But, women could blame THAT on men, too! Blame it on both President Bush’s and Reagan, too. “Men, and their guns.”
27 posted on
12/03/2012 12:52:46 PM PST by
johnthebaptistmoore
(The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
To: nickcarraway
Damn, based on ogling women, I must be a woman!
28 posted on
12/03/2012 1:02:58 PM PST by
Mouton
(Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
To: nickcarraway
Poorly done study. The sharper men in the study probably figured out that this was some kind of sex test, and decided that the best way to get done with it is to spend equal amounts of time on each photo. Either that, or they wanted to get done quickly.
Also, not much description is made of the types of women in the pictures. Old, young? Fat, skinny? Shapely? Homely? Degree of clothing?
The women would be less confirmed with being called a pervert. And, if the pictures look like the pictures in a “Soft Surroundings” or “Tall girl” catalogue, might have been used in the same way that the catalogue is used, checking out the clothes, NOT the women per se.
30 posted on
12/03/2012 1:12:20 PM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: nickcarraway
Pretty common in the canine world, it’s called “bitch aggression”.
31 posted on
12/03/2012 1:12:44 PM PST by
dainbramaged
(My dog can talk - when she feels like it.)
To: nickcarraway
I’ve often said that women wear makeup not for men but for other women. Now there is a study to back me up.
35 posted on
12/03/2012 1:23:39 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, you've likely misread the situation.)
To: nickcarraway
36 posted on
12/03/2012 1:31:10 PM PST by
Rodamala
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson