Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/21/2012 8:45:21 AM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Perdogg
Even if true ... why bring it up?

Jesus and Christianity are already under attack, why add doubt to the mix.

Stupid move.

2 posted on 11/21/2012 8:48:00 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Well...if IL PAPA says so, it MUST be true. ex cathedra and all that bul.


4 posted on 11/21/2012 8:52:21 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Jesus was probably not born on December 25 either.

Though Christians had adopted that date by A.D. 336, Christ was born “when shepherds watched their flocks by night.” In other words, most likely in the spring. And no, He wasn’t born in the year A.D.

The Bible tells us that Herod the Great ruled Palestine when Jesus was born, and Herod died in 4 B.C.—so Jesus had to have been born not long before that.

Yep, Blame Dionysiuys Exiguus for this one—he’s the sixth century monk who came up with the idea of splitting history into A.D. and B.C. He just chose the wrong date to do so, that’s all.


6 posted on 11/21/2012 8:54:06 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Does this mean I am 5 years older than I thought I was?


10 posted on 11/21/2012 9:02:04 AM PST by bunkerhill7 (yup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Whaaaaa?????

Next, they will be telling us He wasn’t born on December 25.

[/s]


12 posted on 11/21/2012 9:02:24 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
It’s amazing to me, of those who call themselves Christians or Messianic Jews, few have a clue of his actual date of birth or even crucifixion.

Many would be shocked to learn what they're really celebrating each Christmas and Easter!

Yeshua (Jesus isn't a Hebrew word) was born on Tishri 15, 3999.

13 posted on 11/21/2012 9:03:40 AM PST by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
"It's been surmised for a very long time that Jesus was born before 1AD so technically we may well be living in 2007 or 2008 or whatever - no one knows for sure."

So, maybe we have not even reached Y2K yet and that is why nothing happened back then with the computers! Gasp. It could happen any time now!! /s

14 posted on 11/21/2012 9:03:46 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Typical mindless blather by a post-Vatican II pontiff.


17 posted on 11/21/2012 9:07:33 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
We already agree that our calendar is wrong, off by anywhere from 2 to 16 years, depending on who's doing the reckoning, and further in error because of the absence of a year zero.

The more fundamental point is that God did not intend us to mark His years by the birth of Jesus.

If He had intended this we would have a Biblical fixing of the date.

Further, the day of Jesus' birth is unremarkable as all men are born.

However, very few return from the dead, that event is remarkable, and it is the defining moment of Christianity, the very moment of proof that his sacrifice was not in vain. And the Bible gives a precise reference for when this happened!

Clearly this was the date the calendar was supposed to start!

For extra points, this makes our calendar off by anywhere from 17 to 30 years. That makes this something like Holy Year 1982 to Holy Year 1995, giving us anywhere from 5 to 18 years to get our affairs in order before the real end of the millennium...

21 posted on 11/21/2012 9:14:41 AM PST by null and void (America - Abducted by Aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

bkmk


25 posted on 11/21/2012 9:21:55 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

This means, as I’ve thought previously, that the year is actually 2015, and proves the Mayan calendar depicting the end of the world is wrong. December 2012 passed three years ago.


37 posted on 11/21/2012 9:44:51 AM PST by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

If you look at history and the records and do the math, then it comes out to 2 or 3 BC late September.


43 posted on 11/21/2012 10:01:42 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Does this mean that the Mayan calendar is wrong, and that the TEOTWAWKI was really November 6, 2012??


44 posted on 11/21/2012 10:04:15 AM PST by Donkey Odious ( Adapt, improvise, and overcome - now a motto for us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Perhaps we can make it 2008 again so we can try again to nominate a better candidate against Obama. :(


45 posted on 11/21/2012 10:05:26 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

This has been known for many years. Why the headlines because the Pope referred to it in his book on Jesus’ infancy? They make it sound like this is some big new claim that the Pope is making. Not so!


47 posted on 11/21/2012 10:11:28 AM PST by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Once again, SOOOOO glad to see the Church so totally focused on the most relevant and pressing issues of our day. /SARC SARC SARC SARC SARC SARC


52 posted on 11/21/2012 10:56:31 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
Jesus was born years earlier than thought, claims Pope

So?

Hasn't it been agreed that 4 BC is closer to actual year already?

58 posted on 11/21/2012 5:12:28 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
That does it! Cancel Xmas!

ATTENTION SHOPPERS: Black Friday has been cancelled! !


64 posted on 11/21/2012 8:55:57 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

See:

http://www.eclipse.net/~molnar/


106 posted on 11/29/2012 7:13:49 AM PST by ZULU (See video: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-first-siege-of-vienna.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

OK, so let’s just all agree that instead of 2012, it’s now 2016... just in time to elect a new president, and since Obama’s second term ends in 2016, he is no longer eligible.


108 posted on 12/02/2012 12:35:56 AM PST by tarawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson