Posted on 09/03/2012 5:24:54 PM PDT by westcoastwillieg
Long Form Birth Certificate (LFBC) Forgery Detection for Dummies describes a technique that anyone with a modicum of computer knowledge can use. The LFBC test can be performed on a basic Windows computernothing is stored on the computer and no other software is required.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
I downloaded the LFBC from the White House website on the day they released it and used Adobe Illustrator to separate out the layers. I’m no genius and don’t claim that I discovered the technique by any means, but when people began posting the method of using Illustrator to break down the document into it’s component parts I was able to do the test myself and confirm that their assertions were legitimate.
There is absolutely zero chance that the LFBC produced by the white house is a scan of a legitimate document.
The microfiche was then digitally scanned and stored.
That digital image was used to print on security paper.
At some point someone scanned the security paper and created a new digital image.
No doubt you can find all sorts of things ~ virtually ever birth certificate in America was subjected to a similar process shortly after the microfiche process was marketed in the 1960s.
The left has been sweating this for years....Obama would not have spent millions to prevent people form accessing his Birth Cert
The real problem with Obama Eligibility have been those supposedly on “our side”..people like Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham, etc etc...who have basically been helping Obama on this issue by attacking “Birthers”. They think the size of Michelle Obama’s backside is more important than the eligibility of her husband as President
By now, especially after Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Posse have stated that the Birth Cert released in 2011 is a fraud....if you are not an Obama Birther by now...you are probably an Obama Supporter
You can't use a PDF file to get a passport, can you?
99% of the anomalies stem back to the fact that the ORIGINAL was photographed and the negative stored as microfiche for many years.
___________________________________________________
So, explain why the Nordyke twins certified BC copy is in what we all expect and recognize as the conventional reverse microfiche format? They were born extremely close in time to the alleged birth of Obama. I’m waiting - - -
The only conclusion rational minds can draw from all of this is that there is something extremely weird going on in this country. There is no other way to describe it. Here we sit moving toward the November and everyone sits around criticizing Obama’s last four years as if his past actions were those of a legitimate president. I am certain all the politicians know by now that he is not legitimate. The gag order on the media and conservative talk is in a complete lock down. All the judges, law enforcement (except Joe Arpaio), and politicians absolutely refuse to talk about it. What could give rise to such lunatic behavior. No one will address Obama's legally fatal defects. They act as though the Constitutional eligibility requirements do not matter. Their contempt and deliberate disregard for the Constitution is inexcusable and constitutes treason.
My gut reaction to this is the "George Soros Capture the Media thru Threats and Intimidation" ploy...but ALL of them??? All? Someone has to walk off the threat stage to stand up.
Did anyone ever give any sort of explanation for the penciled-in number 9’s that are in two of the spaces? I read that a retired worker said that those were a code that indicated the spaces were left blank, but in the released long form birth certificate they were, in fact, filled in. This was evidence of fraud. I haven’t found O-bots address this.
Rush made a short comment on the birther issue a few days ago, but it was followed by a comment on something about he’s said enough.
They are being muted. I pray for the day when we all know the reason for it.
Again, what you see coming from Obamugabe or his running dog lackeys (in terms of the so-called LF BC) is derived from a modern digital dataset that shows what was in the microfiche, which in turn shows you what was in the original page/book created way back when (late 1960s at the earliest)
Then there's this thought ~ certainly with access to the full array of talented forgers and criminals at the KGB, Obamugabe's forged LF BC has to be PERFECTLY in tune with all the others in that file!
99% of the anomalies stem back to the fact that the ORIGINAL was photographed and the negative stored as microfiche for many years.
THERE IS NO ORIGINAL.
That’s the problem!
As I said, when your master forgers in the KGB went to work on this they were very good and very thorough.
You could not be more wrong in your #4.
Please show how you can scan any similar document and get similar layer characteristics. (number of layers/color characteristics/# of bits/grouping of objects/red-blue shift/pixel size).
You could not be more wrong in your #4.
Please show how you can scan any similar document and get similar layer characteristics. (number of layers/color characteristics/# of bits per layer/grouping of objects/red-blue shift (absent)/pixel size).
Yes - there are many combinations of results you may get, depending on the scanning options/set-up.
However - you *WILL NOT* get a result similar to the WHLFCOLB.PDF.
The combination of artifacts in the WHLFCOLB.PDF is not possible with a legit COLOR scan of a paper original.
If you think you can - post the PDF and the process/settings you used to generate it. Pretty simple...
When you used high quality B&W document quality film you didn't have a pixalated matrix ~ rather, you had a random array of microdots.
Once technology allowed us to go to electronic image storage and retrieval, the original documents might have been scanned or re-imaged in a pixalated matrix, and if they weren't available they'd scan the fiche.
You could do a xerox copy of an original document and have a digital print made of the pixalated original stored in electronic compatible media, then overlay them, and probably not immediately see the difference. That's because both systems can yield copy perfectly acceptable to human vision. However, if you magnified the image at some point you'd see the matrix, and see the pixals, and they'd be different (presuming you used equipment made by different companies).
Now, scan that ~ it'll show anomalies that were otherwise invisible to you. They are called ARTIFACTS OF THE PROCESS
Figure how how to read your address.
There are scanning systems out there you can't even imagine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.