Posted on 03/02/2012 3:55:20 PM PST by mtnwmn
Noting that the cause of Andrew Breitbart’s unexpected death yesterday was being examined by the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office, talk-radio host Michael Savage raised the question of whether the conservative media powerhouse – who recently announced he had videos that could politically damage President Obama – was murdered.
On his top-rated show today, Savage played an audio clip of Breitbart telling an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos that shed light on Obama’s ties to radicals in the early 1980s who helped propel him to the presidency
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Okay, then who am I thinking of, anybody? One of the Clinton people was administered the wrong drug during surgery and died. And I did misspell Hubbell. :)
The coroners office has already done the autopsy and has “Deferred” it pending toxicology results. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong but if it was a massive heart attack wouldn’t the coroner have seen that right away? Why have the need for toxicology results unless he did not have a heart attack after all?
Actually there's very little chance he planned to release whatever tapes he had on March 1, because he clearly knew about Arpaio's March 1 plans. It just wouldn't make sense to compete for the few outlets that might consider paying attention to anti-Obama bombshells. (Note to SS: Bombshells is being used figuratively here.)
ML/NJ
Tell you what, since none of us seem to know, why don't you tell us and provide us with a link to that information?
You are thinking of Mcdougal
Thankyou.
Michael made Coast-to-Coast AM sound like mainstream public discourse, but in those rare moments of lucidity, he was ok. We once had a pretty good discussion about colonial black powder firearms and he came across as pretty well versed on the subject.
Ping
Perhaps because he was seen drinking in a bar earlier that evening? Perhaps to determine whether or not the amount of alcohol he drank may have had a contributing factor? Perhaps to find out if any of the medications he was taking due to his heart condition may have combined with the alcohol to cause the heart attack?
No worries i still have boxes of tractor feed paper full of prodigy white water board print outs
Corsi mentioned it at the Cold Case Posse’s presser yesterday. He put Breitbart into contact with Arpaio for that interview. I think WND has an article about it but the video of the presser is at www.wnd.com/2012/03/see-evidence-of-fraud-in-obama-birth-certificate/
My computer freezes up every time I go to anything about Arpaio’s presser so I’m going to need to stop for a while. Probably a good thing; I’ve got plenty I need to get done. I just so keenly feel the need to do the job that the press refuses to do, since they are all covering up what was actually said in that press conference.
Was the autopsy completed before 0700 PST?
The father-in-law’s first statements were that he did NOT know of any cardiac problems. Now that story has changed and all these claims about him being HOSPITALIZED with heart problems are coming out of the woodwork.
If it really was an assassination you can bet that his family would start saying he had had heart problems. They’ve got 4 little kids and a wife to protect.
That’s why the change in the stories from early Thursday morning to now is so suspicious. And I know for a fact that Hannity and the others have been threatened in the past. They are saying what George Soros tells them to say. That’s why Glenn Beck left Fox - because Soros kept threatening them for exposing the Soros/Obama communist-Islamist connections, Fox refused to protect the lower-level staffers who were being threatened, and Beck couldn’t protect them all too. So he started his own company where he could say what he wanted and protect his employees as necessary.
I’ve been spending a LOT of time today dealing with these issues so I need to get stuff done, but if you look up my posts you’ll be able to find a recent post where I gave links that detailed what Hagmann said about this stuff. And though I can’t divulge any more than this, I have two other sources, including law enforcement, who corroborate Hagmann’s claims.
We’re talking serious doo-doo here. And that is why we see what we’re seeing out of the “conservative commentators”. You can see it with your own eyes.
I tend to doubt he was assassinated. The last few times I saw him on television he did not look like a well man to me.
But for the sake of argument, if he was, it might have had to do with Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation. If Breitbart had become convinced of Obama’s ineligiblity, he had the platform and respect to singlehandedly sway the opinion of the entire conservative movement. All those naysaying conservative writers, radiomen, and bloggers would not have been quick to dismiss Breitbart. Neither would Drudge. He could have brought incredible pressure on opinionmakers and lawmakers to get to the bottom of Obama’s history.
Doesn’t say.
LOS ANGELES (CBS) — The Los Angeles County Coroner’s office has made an announcement regarding an autopsy on conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart.
The statement read as follows, “The examination took place, today, 03/02/2012. The final cause of death has been “Deferred” pending the receipt of toxicological and microscopic studies. It is anticipated that these test results should be available in 4 to 6 weeks. Once the results have been received and evaluated, a final cause of death will be entered for Mr. Breitbart.
No further information or reports will be available until the final cause of death is established.”
The statement was issued by Craig R. Harvey, Chief Coroner Investigator & Chief of Operations.
That lady was columnist Dorothy Kilgallen. A darn good investigative reporter at the time.
Has Bean changed his story - or is it just the conflicting statement from the “friend”?
Wouldn’t surprise me one bit. I know these threats are real. I’ve got sources, I’ve checked out the timing of various related events, and we can all see with our own eyes that “conservatives” are not touching this issue even though a legitimate law enforcement body has said there is probable cause for forgery and fraud - as well as some other things, like that the newspaper announcements are not credible because there are 3-year-olds and foreign-born children listed in those announcements. And that a witness is willing to testify that he heard Bill Ayers’ mom introduce Obama as a foreign student they were helping get an American education.
Why would none of the “conservative media” find it interesting in the least that a law enforcement body had that kind of evidence?
I know why, and everybody in the media knows why. They’re just too scared to tell us why. That’s what terrorism, and we’re dealing with a George Soros who has said he’s afraid the US will win the “war on terror”. IOW, he embraces the use of terror to bring America down. Interesting, too, that his ex-girlfriend came out - according to a thread here on FR on Wed evening, shortly before Breitbart died - saying she has tapes that she’s willing to air, so people will believe that Soros has had a stalker trying to scare her. These are the tactics of a criminal jerk who hates America.
Did I read of hear that there was a jogger somewhere near by?
Got it!
Right wing conspiracy theorists know what happened to Breitbart ...www.examiner.com/.../right-wing-conspiracy-theorists-know-what-h...You +1’d this publicly. Undo
11 hours ago – President Obama killed controversial conservative blogger Andrew Brei. ... of March 2, some 27 hours after Breitbart collapsed on a sidewalk near his home .... Very little mention of the jogger seen running by Breitbart minutes ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.