What gave the right for the officer to enter the property without the owner’s permission?
She wasn’t a suspect and she had broken no law.
It’s almost as though cops are looking for dogs to shoot.
Sad story. Ms. Baca probably has never had much dealings with the cops.
She requested that she be notified when they were on the way - unlikely to happen.
She assumed the officer would respond knowing the reason for her call - it could well be that never happened either, given the cop climbed her fence. Maybe the cop thought the caller was in a potentially bad situation. Maybe.
While I can’t blame her for doing so, personally I would never leave aggressive, or for that matter, any, dogs outside even in the back yard, knowing people were on the way over - particularly cops that routinely don’t respect private property.
friggin’ cops....
Moron cops strike again.
She called to make a report, not to have the cops go in her backyard!
|
|
These trigger happy thugs aren't bright eough to realize that they are peeing on their last support group.
We are inches away from a civil war, and Obama's shaved headed bloused boot pretend soldiers are trying to make sure that every one of those "civilians" they sneer at are going to enjoy taking revenge on them...
About 35 years ago, I had just set the timing on my 71 Chevy,
then I asked an older auto class teacher; “How do they get out of time, after you have just set the timing?”
He answered;................ “HUMAN.”
Then, after that incident, there will be another in a totally different State. This will be about the killing of a favored pet in a situation that is totally unjustified. The owner of the pet, in a rush of rage and a flush of emotion, will react in a manner that can best be described as 'murderous.' The owner will not survive, but like the first case he will go down with his own 'butcher's bill.' This will also lead to a change of protocol in regards to treatment of private property (whether private property is one's home, or one's dog) and the circumstances that give a LEO justification in engaging in certain action.
Someday. Soon. It is not a wish (I wouldn't wish for anyone to be harmed, be he/she civilian or LEO, and I believe the vast majority of LEOs do real good under hard circumstances and little recognition) ...it is just plain mathematics. Permutations and probabilities, and the likelihood of an event occurring based on the current trajectory of certain precursor events. What is a surprise is that there hasn't been a dynamic entry yet to the 'wrong' house (wrong as in an innocent civilian who knows his way around personal defense) or kill the wrong dog (such as the case when some perps killed the dog of a former SEAL who chased them for miles in a highspeed chase at night). It is a matter of mathematics ...and if I was the Chief of a PD I would be a little worried since it appears, so far, LEOs have been tossing straight Heads with no Tails for years now. Sooner or later they will bump into the wrong civilian. Sooner or later.
Yet more proof for the truism that “There are very few situations that can’t be made worse by the addition of a cop.”
I will never, ever, call the cops if at all possible. I will do everything to avoid any involvement with them. They are not to be trusted.
Cop acting stupidly!
The point that strikes me about all of these dog shootings is that they must be the result of official or unofficial policy. There are way too many of them to be a massive coincidence.
I suspect that the policy is unofficial - one JBT talking to another in the JBT locker room, and then another and then another. I think that’s how it happens.
More indications that the police have turned into thugs with guns. Must have looking to get himself on the SWAT squad so he can play soldier on civilians.
“..., however that’s the situation that occurred and so now we’ll deal with it,” Lt. Robert McDonald said.
NO—The family is now left to deal with it and the cops walk with impunity and the satisfaction of knowing there is one less dog in the community.
Well, good for them!
The sooner some clever lawyer nails one of these jack-booted thugs the better. Too many of them just think that because they have a badge they can do about anything that pleases them. And no, aside from an occasional speeding ticket I have had no run-ins with the law.
http://www.examiner.com/dogs-in-national/questions-after-police-shoot-dog-new-mexico
An update, of sorts:
Why did the officer jump a fence to enter the property for something as minor as filing a report about an online scam?
Why did the officer enter the property when there were signs posted on the property warning of “guard dogs” on the premises - especially for a non emergency situation?
Why did the officer claim that the dog bit him, but the State Police advised KOB 4 News that the officer was not hurt?
There is an investigation underway into this officer’s use of deadly force...according to the report, Baca is securing an attorney.