Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This will be interesting. It will have the limits imposed by small sensor size but if Nikon can get halfway decent pics out of it there will be a place for it. I searched, can't find any comprehensive reviews yet.
1 posted on 02/01/2012 9:39:20 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: lawnguy; pandoraou812; Daffynition; barker; ferri; gjeiii; genefromjersey; texas booster; ...

pinglist


2 posted on 02/01/2012 9:41:13 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Even if that 42x can turn out 20x of awesomeness, it’ll still be worth the buy.


3 posted on 02/01/2012 9:44:25 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

etc.

Looks like a lens out of a GlobalHawk. lol

4 posted on 02/01/2012 9:45:05 PM PST by Theoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

This will be great if the photos are good. I’d love to have one for our spring trip.


5 posted on 02/01/2012 9:47:05 PM PST by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Before I left for Canada last Christmas, bought this Olympus that Best Buy was selling where they threw in the tripod, 4 Gb sd card and camera bag for 99. It’s becoming custom nowadays to have the 720P to 1080P Hd recording feature but the 42x zoom beats out the 5x zoom. Ridiculous zoom ratio that 42..


7 posted on 02/01/2012 9:49:58 PM PST by max americana (Buttcrack Obama is an idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
It will have the limits imposed by small sensor size

Isn't the sensor size crucial for great pics, especially with a high amount of pixels?

9 posted on 02/01/2012 9:51:29 PM PST by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Mit out a tripod, you ain’t going nowhere, boy!


10 posted on 02/01/2012 9:51:37 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Thanks for posting. Looking to upgrade from my Lumix. This might be the one I’m looking for.


15 posted on 02/01/2012 10:07:05 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
but if Nikon can get halfway decent pics out of it there will be a place for it.

With that kind of zoom, it better have a superduper optical image stabilizer...

17 posted on 02/01/2012 10:08:21 PM PST by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Actually, Nikon has this info up.
18 posted on 02/01/2012 10:14:53 PM PST by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Quite an improvement over the Olympus D-200L, the first digital camera I bought in 1996 : 0.3 megapixels, optical viewfinder only, 2 MB internal storage and cost about $500 as I recall.

Hard to imagine that was only 16 years ago.

19 posted on 02/01/2012 10:15:03 PM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

16MP and 42X zoom could be the finest camera for the price in history. Wow.


20 posted on 02/01/2012 10:16:35 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I would appreciate an unbiased opinion from someone who knows more than I do about older 35mm film type SLRs. I have a couple, and they both cost four or five hundred way back. Are they boat anchors now because of digital technology, or are the lenses still worth anything?


23 posted on 02/01/2012 10:23:08 PM PST by matthew fuller (My replacement for Drudge-http://www.webcommentary.com/links.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Two things can make these features work. Image Stabilization and the ability to use very high ISO equivalents due to improvements in the sensors.

My D7000 does amazing things handheld.

I used to never shoot without a tripod if I was doing anything serious, now I rarely use one.

I wonder how fast the lens is. Not too, I’d guess....


29 posted on 02/01/2012 10:51:31 PM PST by moonhawk (Romney tucks his tail and licks the hand that beats him. Newt rips it off at the shoulder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Your thread got me to wondering what the equivalent magnifying power of my telephoto lens and camera combination was and how cropping an image increases magnification.

Here, for example, is a photo of some coots taken with a Canon EOS 7d and a 100-400mm lens set at 400mm. The Canon EOS 7d multiplies the focal length by 1.6, so the effective focal length of this photo is 640mm. I've read that you can divide the focal length by 50mm to tell how magnified the image is compared to a picture taken with a 50mm lens. By doing that I get a magnification of 12.8 compared to a 50mm lens of a full frame camera that doesn't multiply the focal length. A 1000mm lens like that Nikon camera you posted about would give a magnification of 20 compared to a 50mm lens.

Here's the photo:

I noticed that the coot in the middle was more or less in focus, so I cropped the image such that it was about 1/9th of the area of the original 640mm picture. Here is the resulting image blown up to the same size as the picture above:

If my calculatons are correct (always questionable), the magnification on this cropped image is 9 times 12.8, or 115 times that that a 50mm lens would give. Keep in mind I'm dealing with area of the image here, not its height or width, which would both be multiplied by a lower adjustment figure than I used in the area calculations above.

41 posted on 02/01/2012 11:31:04 PM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Doesn’t look like it’d fit in my pocket. Is it still considered Compact?


46 posted on 02/01/2012 11:55:14 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I just happen to be in the market for a new camera. Have been loking at the Canon G12, but this looks interesting.


49 posted on 02/02/2012 1:13:23 AM PST by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I want one, now! Is it too late to ask Santa?


53 posted on 02/02/2012 1:50:47 AM PST by grame (May you know more of the love of God Almighty this day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

1000mm at f256.

Great for shooting photos of the sun.


60 posted on 02/02/2012 4:11:00 AM PST by FLAMING DEATH (Are you better off than you were $4 trillion ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
SS. Here's a Review. From the 'place of all places' for camera reviews:
dpreview.com Nikon Coolpix P510
I found that website thanks to you. My digital SLR 'Obie-One' :-)

You know I love Nikon, but they're driving me crazy now with a new, 'better', camera coming out every 3 months. That aside, I'll never leave the SLR realm. Those are cameras, to me everything else is a 'picture taking box' for newbies.

62 posted on 02/02/2012 5:21:18 AM PST by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson