Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney signs off on permanent assault weapons ban
iberkshires ^ | Thursday, July 08, 2004

Posted on 01/23/2012 11:17:40 PM PST by RC one

Governor Mitt Romney has signed into law a permanent assault weapons ban that he says will make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns.

Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts, Romney said, at a bill signing ceremony on July 1 with legislators, sportsman's groups and gun safety advocates. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.

Like the federal assault weapons ban, the state ban, put in place in 1998, was scheduled to expire in September. The new law ensures these deadly weapons, including AK-47s, UZIs and Mac-10 rifles, are permanently prohibited in Massachusetts no matter what happens on the federal level.

We are pleased to mark an important victory in the fight against crime, said Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey. The most important job of state government is ensuring public safety. Governor Romney and I are determined to do whatever it takes to stop the flood of dangerous weapons into our cities and towns and to make Massachusetts safer for law-abiding citizens.

(Excerpt) Read more at iberkshires.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
an oldie but goodie for the benefit of those few who don't yet know but probably should.
1 posted on 01/23/2012 11:17:48 PM PST by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RC one

what was Mitt saying about Newt sitting on a couch with Nanci Pelosi?

2 posted on 01/23/2012 11:23:01 PM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

That ices it for me.


3 posted on 01/23/2012 11:28:37 PM PST by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

good news. This permanent AWB will not play well in Michigan in my opinion. Michigan is sportsman country and the second amendment means something to those folks. I could jog over to Michigan in about 10 minutes btw. Here in Ohio, the second amendment still has meaning too. Jobs will absolutely be the key issue in Both Ohio and Michigan BUT, for those on the fence, this will “ice it” for many.


4 posted on 01/23/2012 11:33:45 PM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Laws make it impossible for the law abiding.

Laws have no effect on those that are not law abiding.

5 posted on 01/23/2012 11:45:02 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

who cares if a gun is designed by a certain military to hunt humans.

It can still be used to hunt, plink or target practice.

heck, it can even be used in shooting contests.

Romney, shooting blanks in support of the 2nd Amendment.

I’m Vendome and I approve this Ad.


6 posted on 01/23/2012 11:48:30 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people tyrants.
7 posted on 01/23/2012 11:50:25 PM PST by GregoryFul (Obama - Jim Jones redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

What kind of idiotic “sportsmans groups” do they have in Massachusetts?


8 posted on 01/23/2012 11:55:54 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

target shooting is one of my favorite hobbies but it has gotten so expensive, I hate to waste the ammo. It was a lot more fun when you could actually afford ammo. Expensive ammo will kill the sport as sure as any democrat.


9 posted on 01/23/2012 11:58:30 PM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RC one

THAT... is one excellent caption.
I hope the Gingrich camp sees that. And they will if they are doing their due diligence and carefully reading Free Republic every day.


10 posted on 01/24/2012 12:01:58 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Romney had a ~30% favorability rating when he “left” office. In truth, he didn’t even bother running for a second term because he was so freaking unpopular that he knew he had no chance. Judging by his favorability, I don’t think the sportsman’s groups of Massachusetts cared for him or his AWB. oh yeah, Romney was kicked out of office by the electorate and was utterly disgraced.


11 posted on 01/24/2012 12:04:43 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I hope our undecided republican brothers and sisters in Florida are carefully reading Free Republic every day as they try to make up their minds.


12 posted on 01/24/2012 12:07:33 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RC one
an oldie but goodie for the benefit of those few who don't yet know but probably should.

I didn't know, so thank you.

My question to you or anyone who knows is:
What's Mitt's "position" on the 2nd Amendment now, and when did he do his flip-flop?

This will provide even more fresh meat for Newt as the primaries move into the midwest. Heck, I even know leftists who are strongly pro-2nd Amendment.

13 posted on 01/24/2012 12:08:21 AM PST by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Crony Capitalism & Union boot-licking Marxist politicians are our undoing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARepublicanForAllReasons
What's Mitt's "position" on the 2nd Amendment now

I don't care what he says his position is now. He already crossed that line so I don't trust him to hold it in the future. Honestly, I doubt he even knows where he stands on the issue though being the political jellyfish that he is.

14 posted on 01/24/2012 12:14:27 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RC one

You are right about that.


15 posted on 01/24/2012 12:30:55 AM PST by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Crony Capitalism & Union boot-licking Marxist politicians are our undoing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RC one

” with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people”.
with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing blue helmets.


16 posted on 01/24/2012 3:38:55 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
"What kind of idiotic “sportsmans groups” do they have in Massachusetts?"

Anyone for croquet?
17 posted on 01/24/2012 3:44:27 AM PST by ari-freedom (If SOPA passes, we will lose our Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RC one

“Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts, Romney said”
But, if the ATF wants to ship a bunch to Mexico, I’ll not stand in the way, or demand the Atty. General be indicted.


18 posted on 01/24/2012 3:44:27 AM PST by Fireone (Gingrich/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

The one on the right hasn’t had a drink in 2 years...


19 posted on 01/24/2012 3:48:28 AM PST by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one
The new law ensures these deadly weapons, including AK-47s, UZIs and Mac-10 rifles, are permanently prohibited in Massachusetts no matter what happens on the federal level.

Just like they do not abide by Federal Tax law in regards to "Death Tax".

I have family their, the lay of the land is pretty, but we might as well sell it to France, it is heartbreaking given it is one of our cradles of Liberty.

20 posted on 01/24/2012 3:55:44 AM PST by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson