Posted on 12/06/2011 9:59:29 AM PST by bayouranger
On October 28, 2011, the jihadi forum Minbar Al-Tawhid Wal-Jihad published a fatwa by Sheikh Abu Humam Al-Athari, a member of its shari'a council, in which he unequivocally permits mujahideen to capture the infidels' women and have sexual intercourse with them, even those who are married, on the claim that their marriage bonds to infidels are dissolved as soon as they are taken captive.
Following are the fatwa's main points:
The inquiry in response to which Al-Athari issued the fatwa reads as follows:[1] "Is it permissible for mujahideen in jihad fronts to kidnap the infidels' women and hold them as their captives? What is the ruling regarding a captive in our times? How should they be divided [among the mujahideen]? Is it permissible to imprison [an infidel woman who has been taken captive] in an infidel land, or must she be brought to Dar Al-Islam [the abode of Islam]? How much time must one wait before having sexual intercourse with her, regarding both one who is a virgin and one who is not?"
Al-Athari replies: "There is no doubt that taking the women of the combatant infidels captive – whether they are from Ahl Al-Kitab [i.e., Christians or Jews] or pagans – is permitted according to the shari'a... That being said, it must be done only after [the spoils] has been divided by an imam in Dar Al-Islam; if there is no imam at hand, prisoners may not be taken..."
Al-Athari emphasizes that before deciding to take infidel women captive, "one must consider the gains and losses that will result from this deed, which is to say that if the imam of the Muslims in a given country believes that taking the infidels' women captive will lead the infidels to band together and rape the Muslims' women, and that the Muslims are in too weak a state to prevent this, he should forbid taking [infidel women] captive..."
Al-Athari notes that "there are too many proofs of the permissibility of taking the infidels' women captive to enumerate here, but we can divide them into two categories: 'general proofs' and 'concrete proofs.'" He explains that the "general proofs" are those which clarify that it is forbidden to violate the honor of Muslim women, but that this does not hold true regarding the infidel women, except in cases where they are assured protection. Al-Athari claims that the permissibility is absolute and anchored in the principles of the shari'a. Therefore, he says, it does not necessitate proof, and it falls rather on those who forbid taking infidel women captive to prove the legitimacy their claims.
In his discussion of "concrete proofs," Al-Athari quotes Al-Qurtubi, who says: "Most scholars, including Malik [ibn Anas], Al-Shafi'i, Abu Hanifa,[2] and others, thought that taking [infidel women] captive removes the protection [they previously enjoyed], and permits whoever is holding them to have sexual intercourse with them." Al-Athari also quotes another scholar whose interpretation of Al-Qurtubi's ruling says that the latter uses the word "protection" to refer to married women, who are forbidden to men other than their husbands. That is, when these women are taken captive, their marriage contracts with their infidel husbands become void, and they become permissible to their captors. Al-Athari adds that the amount of time a captor must wait until having sexual intercourse with a captive infidel woman depends on her condition: if she is pregnant, he must wait until after she gives birth; if she is menstruating, he must wait until after her period is over; and if she is young and has not yet begun menstruating, he must wait a month from her capture.
As I stated before: Police can't protect us, and the government can't protect us. It's time to start setting some ground rules, boundaries, and examples that these sick perverts can understand...
Hey Minbar, you sick perverted son of an unmarried whore! My wife and daughter are not yours for the taking, and we have no intention of them becoming the objects of your sick attention! They are are armed and prepared to KILL YOU, AND YOUR PERVERTED RAPIST FOLLOWERS, whenever you even look at them funny! And if there's anything left to you or them when they are finished with you, I will be happy to complete the task and hang you out as an example!
I'm done trying to reason, because you can't reason with insanity...
Take names and make lists folks, as I'm sure I'm on some now....
Read my tag line, it applies to all except moderate mooselimbs, both of them, when identified, will be spared.
The rest of the radical mooselimbs should be turned into glass.
“Fatwads always permit the most vile things..... “
And that’s the main reason these losers follow islam in the first place.
My tagline says it all.
Islam and every last one of its adherents are unfit to live on this planet and every day I see more and more reasons why they and their sickening, filthy beliefs should be eradicated.
“if she is young and has not yet begun menstruating, he must wait a month from her capture.”
Like prophet, like follower.
But since it’s permitted then it’s not rape-rape so all’s good, right?
“What the Mujahideen really want to know is does this also apply to goats and small boys.
Ask the US Senate re:UCMJ.
A month after capture a two year old baby girl is fair game for rape.
Got it.
Don't insult pigs.
Only one cure for such 7th century ignorance.
Slhhhick BAM!
Fatwa? Who needs a fatwah? It’s already happening here in Norway.
“Two out of three charged with rape in Norway’s capital are immigrants with a non-western background according to a police study. The number of rape cases is also rising steadily.The study is the first where the crime statistics have been analyzed according to ethnic origin. Of the 111 charged with rape in Oslo last year, 72 were of non-western ethnic origin, 25 are classified as Norwegian or western and 14 are listed as unknown.
Rape charges in the capital are spiraling upwards, 40 percent higher from 1999 to 2000 and up 13 percent so far this year.”
Anders behring Breivik was right!
The US Second Amendment Permits American Patriots to Shoot to Kill Mujahideen who Kidnap , Imprison, And Have Sexual Intercourse with Infidel Women.
Take yer pick, Fatwa or the US Constitution.
If YOU pick fatwa, get the hell out of America and stay out.
Pheeew! This would be a real problem if they liked girls!
Islam is not a religon. It is a political system that was set up to enable and justify the sexual perversions of a madman.
Just kill them as fast as you can with what ever means works best. The faster the world is rid of these animals the better off we all are.
“Islam is not a religon. It is a political system that was set up to enable and justify the sexual perversions of a madman.”
I would add one more statemtent to that.
“and I learned all I need to know about islam on 9/11.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.