Penis Amputee Receives No Damages in Kentucky Trial

ABC News ^ | 8/24/11 | Mikaela Conley

[ArrogantBustard]

Isn’t there a movement to outlaw circumcision in San Francisco?

I think the "movement" hasn't gotten on the ballot yet. They do have a couple of idiotic and disgusting "superhero" type propaganda comic books out featuring the adventures of "Foreskin Man".

[Larry Lucido]

Apparently, he wanted MORE damages. I’d say enough was received.

[null and void]

Are we now going to post pics of any gnarly thing that’s longer than it is wide?

Or wider than it is long?

Anybody? Anybody? Chode? Chode?

[kevkrom]

Was this small claims court?

[Slings and Arrows]

Or anywhere else.

[Daffynition]

Hope there's a rainbow at the end of his legal nightmare.

[golux]

Well done, Fred!

[Slings and Arrows]

Ouch.

[goseminoles]

I agree with you. This is bs. I’ve never heard of emergency cancer surgery. The doc should have called off the procedure and let him get a second opinion. This is nuts.

[Eva]

Yeah, that’s what I had read about in the WSJ. It sparked quite a discussion on the comment board.

Interestingly, the movement seemed to be backed mostly by women, who claimed that there uncircumcised partners claimed to have more satisfying sex than their circumcised partners, who were more likely to be viagra users.

I told her that if she and her circumcised friends were experiencing sexual dysfunction at an early age, they might look for some other reason than circumcision because I didn’t recall anyone complaining about early sexual dysfunction back in the seventies.

[Eva]

I didn’t read anything about where the surgery was done, whether or not it was an HMO, where the cost could have trumped the consent.

[goseminoles]

Well, we all sign a consent form authorizing emergency tx should something go bad.. but to lop a schwong is wrong!!

[metmom]

What? All female jury?

Probably not. Looks like there were two men on it.

[metmom]

I have a hard time believing that the doctor could tell it was cancerous just by looking at it.

That requires biopsies from everything I’ve been told by every doctor I’ve ever talked to.

Even so, he could have finished up and addressed the issue later. I can’t believe that it was so immediately life threatening that the guy couldn’t have gone back later, better informed and prepared.

And really, if it was cancer and he decided not to receive the *treatment*, that after all, is his choice.

I think the doctor was wrong in making that kind of rash decision.

[Chode]

???

[Titan Magroyne]

What’s that thing between your legs?
What’s that thing between your legs?
What’s that thing between your legs?
Cried the fair young maiden.



Well it ain't me c__k, wot the doc chopped off...
Said Barnacle Bill the sailor.

I'm gonna get sent to bed without my supper, but I couldn't help m'self.

[ArrogantBustard]

ROFL!!!

[SunkenCiv]

Sounds like this case was no baloney.

[bigheadfred]

BWAAAAHAHHHAAAAAHAHA!

[grey_whiskers]

Do you mean the evidence wouldn’t stand up in court?

I couldn't say. You've have to examine his briefs.

Cheers!