I think the "movement" hasn't gotten on the ballot yet. They do have a couple of idiotic and disgusting "superhero" type propaganda comic books out featuring the adventures of "Foreskin Man".
Yeah, that’s what I had read about in the WSJ. It sparked quite a discussion on the comment board.
Interestingly, the movement seemed to be backed mostly by women, who claimed that there uncircumcised partners claimed to have more satisfying sex than their circumcised partners, who were more likely to be viagra users.
I told her that if she and her circumcised friends were experiencing sexual dysfunction at an early age, they might look for some other reason than circumcision because I didn’t recall anyone complaining about early sexual dysfunction back in the seventies.