Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neutrons Become Cubes Inside Neutron Stars
Technology Review ^ | 8/11/11

Posted on 08/11/2011 2:05:14 PM PDT by LibWhacker

Intense pressure can force neutrons into cubes rather than spheres, say physicists

Inside atomic nuclei, protons and neutrons fill space with a packing density of 0.74, meaning that only 26 percent of the volume of the nucleus in is empty.

That's pretty efficient packing. Neutrons achieve a similar density inside neutron stars, where the force holding neutrons together is the only thing that prevents gravity from crushing the star into a black hole.

Today, Felipe Llanes-Estrada at the Technical University of Munich in Germany and Gaspar Moreno Navarro at Complutense University in Madrid, Spain, say neutrons can do even better.

These guys have calculated that under intense pressure, neutrons can switch from a spherical symmetry to a cubic one. And when that happens, neutrons pack like cubes into crystals with a packing density that approaches 100%.

Anyone wondering where such a form of matter might exist would naturally think if the centre of neutron stars. But there's a problem.

On the one hand, most neutron stars have a mass about 1.4 times that of the Sun, which is too small to generate the required pressures for cubic neutrons. On the other, stars much bigger than two solar masses collapse to form black holes.

That doesn't leave much of a mass range in which cubic neutrons can form.

As luck would have it, however, last year astronomers discovered in the constellation of Scorpius the most massive neutron star ever seen. This object, called PSR J1614-2230, has a mass 1.97 times that of the Sun.

That's about as large as theory allows (in fact its mere existence rules out various theories about the behaviour of mass at high densities). But PSR J1614-2230 is massive enough to allow the existence of cubic neutrons.

Astrophysicists will be rubbing their hands at the prospect. The change from spherical to cubic neutrons should have a big influence on the behaviour a neutron star. It would change the star's density, it's stiffness and its rate of rotation, among other things.

So astronomers will be getting their lens cloths out and polishing furiously in the hope of observing this entirely new form of matter in the distant reaches of the galaxy.


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; cubes; gammaraybursts; neutron; neutrons; neutronstars; science; stars; stringtheory; supernova
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2011 2:05:16 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ping to the Badger


2 posted on 08/11/2011 2:15:32 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

bflr


3 posted on 08/11/2011 2:21:08 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Using this technology, airlines can get more people on a 737.


4 posted on 08/11/2011 2:25:53 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

“airlines can get more people on a 737.”

Didja ever see those melons that the Japanese grow in boxes? Stackable!


5 posted on 08/11/2011 2:34:11 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Three words: square beer bottles.


6 posted on 08/11/2011 2:42:48 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Neutrons Become Cubes Inside Neutron Stars

I knew that! Took them this long to figure it out? maroons

7 posted on 08/11/2011 2:43:29 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Obama takes office, and 2 years later our nation is using the word 'default'? -HereInTheHeartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
It's worth noting that a stellar mass 1.97 times that of our own sun, Sol, really isn't very big. But at just 2 stellar masses or greater, what is known as the Chandrasekhar Limit is reached, after which even the strong nuclear force cannot resist the pull of gravity, and we have the next (and last) stage in the cycle -- a singularity, or black hole.

It's a strange world we live in. And it's an only too fitting irony that the more deeply we delve into the ultimate nature of reality, the more unreal it becomes.

8 posted on 08/11/2011 2:44:47 PM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

9 posted on 08/11/2011 2:47:14 PM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Democrats: the Party of NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I know I could look this up but what is the distribution of stars with regard to solar mass? i.e. median star is x solar mass, one standard deviation is y solar mass etc.


10 posted on 08/11/2011 2:58:31 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I contend that because the bosons constituting neutrons are asymmetrical and so the neutrons are squeezed into little rectangles instead of cubes.


11 posted on 08/11/2011 3:17:17 PM PDT by rsobin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

I’d have to look it up, too (and will because it never hurts to review!). But I do know most stars are dwarf stars and that the Sun is in approximately the 75th percentile when it comes to mass.


12 posted on 08/11/2011 3:17:39 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

13 posted on 08/11/2011 3:28:58 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Now THIS star is simply-


14 posted on 08/11/2011 4:05:49 PM PDT by mikrofon (VY Canis Majoris ... that's what it says.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...

Thanks martin_fierro. Cubic neutrons... could be an interesting sci-fi dream sequence for SpongeBob.


· String Theory Ping List ·
721 posted on 04/24/2007 8:14:42 PM PDT by DocRock
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


15 posted on 08/11/2011 4:28:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]



Click the Birdie and Smile!

When a New Monthly Donor Signs Up
A Sponsoring FReeper Will Contribute $10


Sign up today

16 posted on 08/11/2011 4:36:07 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Thanks for posting. IMHO, neutron stars are some of the most fascinating objects in the universe.


17 posted on 08/11/2011 4:38:56 PM PDT by Gena Bukin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; LibWhacker
I'm learning plenty on this thread.

You mean our sun's mass is in the 75th percentile??? And all we need is for something of the same mass to come crashing into it, and we're in a black hole???

18 posted on 08/11/2011 7:52:34 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("That's the great cosmic question: Are 'Liberals' evil or stupid." Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; LibWhacker
I'm learning plenty on this thread.

You mean our sun's mass is in the 75th percentile??? And all we need is for something of the same mass to come crashing into it, and we're in a black hole???

19 posted on 08/11/2011 7:52:52 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("That's the great cosmic question: Are 'Liberals' evil or stupid." Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
I don't know what you mean by '75th percentile'... As stars go, our sun is way down on the small end of the size spectrum.

But yes, you only need twice the mass of our sun to tip the scales into oblivion. The chances of something else of similar mass colliding with Sol, though, are about the equivalent of two gnats hitting each other while flying through the grand canyon.

Space is vast, especially in the outer rim of the Milky Way where we reside, to where the chances of such a thing happening are virtually nonexistent.

20 posted on 08/12/2011 4:58:46 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson