Posted on 05/15/2011 11:34:54 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
LOL!
OK I just decided.
If Palin doesn't run, Paul has my vote.
Interview?
More like interrogate.
Every talking point, was anti-freedom and pro-regulation.
Chris Wallace, this FReeper is quite disappointed, and you have just thrown my vote the other way you clearly intended.
Freedom is not some vague concept. Freedom is not about heroin. Freedom is not about red herrings.
Freedom is AMERICA.
Paul is a NUT and will not/ can not be taken seriously.
RuPaul wouldn't have approved the bin Laden raid.
He isn't fit to be president. Period.
Paul is a Constitutionalist.
No more. No less.
What exactly is wrong with that?
He can’t be elected! Fail!
Not a thing in my book.
Lots of hand-waving so far.
Any specifics?...
I found myself agreeing with every single thing Paul said.
Ben Franklin was a nut and odd individual. His views and theories however were critical in the development of our nation. He was unelectable, yet important.
Paul is best to be placed in cabinet level position with enough power to attack the fed the audit the living crap out of it.
Any other position including president he is wasted on.
“He can’t be elected! Fail!”
Only if we allow the MSM to “Think” for us and choose our leaders.
In a United States so locked into a ‘march step’ mentality among its War Leaders, and Politicians, in leading their citizens into further expansion of their World War, Congressman Paul ‘crossed the line’, according to Russian Political Scientists, when he recently stated upon the floor of the United Congress:
“Patriotism is more closely linked to dissent than it is to conformity and a blind desire for safety and security. Understanding the magnificent rewards of a free society makes us unbashful in its promotion, fully realizing that maximum wealth is created and the greatest chance for peace comes from a society respectful of individual liberty”.
Read more »
Semper Truth!
Gunny G
aka: Dick Gaines
*****
The man’s in his me -70’s. He’s a Truther who blames America for 9/11. He’s against any form of national defense. You want this nut case to be president? Do you really have a clue about him?
He is NOT a Constitutionalist. He's a Libertarian. He may be fiscally conservative if it fits him, but he's very socially liberal. That is NOT a Constitutionalist.
Two words: No. Way.
Ron Paul did a 180 on immigration, and is now a totally open-borders guy. This comes after a career of being “pro-life” but consistently finding an excuse to vote with the party of death. I don’t trust him further than I could throw him.
“He is NOT a Constitutionalist. He’s a Libertarian.”
-
Full disclosure: I’m a libertarian (small-l)
It is my opinion, our founders were as well.
Freedom is libertarian.
Every here and there, paul talks the good talk, but then, so do john mccain and david duke. Sometimes you have to listen between the lines. REALLY.
He’s quite the porker. http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/12/18/ron-paul-attempts-to-pork-out-on-american-taxpayers/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.