To: TheGunny
Paul is a Constitutionalist.
No more. No less.
What exactly is wrong with that?
To: Cringing Negativism Network
He can’t be elected! Fail!
5 posted on
05/15/2011 11:43:35 AM PDT by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
6 posted on
05/15/2011 11:45:11 AM PDT by
DManA
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Paul is a Constitutionalist.He is NOT a Constitutionalist. He's a Libertarian. He may be fiscally conservative if it fits him, but he's very socially liberal. That is NOT a Constitutionalist.
14 posted on
05/15/2011 11:53:38 AM PDT by
bcsco
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Then whats the proper approach to capture Bin Laden? Bin Laden is hiding in Pakistan and previous times in which we told Pakistan where he is, he managed to escape. In this scenario, whats the “proper” and “moral” approach that Ron Paul would approve?
24 posted on
05/15/2011 12:00:12 PM PDT by
4rcane
To: Cringing Negativism Network
RuPaul is not a Constitutionalist. A Constitutionalist defends the country. Paul would sacrifice it to extremists. Ta ta, RuPaul.
44 posted on
05/15/2011 12:25:17 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: Cringing Negativism Network
.
Ron Paul is a conceited self-serving Political Loon ...
The "only" reason the MSM covers Ron Paul is to damage the Conservative Movement ...
IF Ron Paul was a Democrat ... arguing aginst "Zero" ... Ron Paul would receive NO POLITICAL COVERAGE AT ALL ...
.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
"Paul is a Constitutionalist.
No more. No less.
What exactly is wrong with that?"Bump the hell out of that.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Paul is a Constitutionalist. No more. No less. What exactly is wrong with that? He is a Libertarian and a mess.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Paul is a delight. He is making inroads among the young college educated by teaching “original intent”, which having been ignored utterly by our presidents from both sides of the aisle, now has us in all but shackles.
Paul deserves a hearing and I am thinking he is a thinker! He makes me think. He is jolting; a slap across the jaw to wake up! I like that.
(I’m still non-committed and quite prepared to vote for ANYBODY BUT OBAMA, and cheerfully.)
110 posted on
05/15/2011 1:55:22 PM PDT by
RitaOK
To: Cringing Negativism Network
123 posted on
05/15/2011 2:38:01 PM PDT by
RaceBannon
(Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Ron Paul for a number of years ran a clearly anti-semitic news letter.
He's toned down his rants a bit, but every time you hear him mention Israel you know he's still got that old fire in his belly.
Obama is also an anti-semite.
Neither one of these guys are fit to be our President.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I’d prefer to put him in charge of investigating the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve.
That would be a full time job for him, and I think he’d do a great job of it!
144 posted on
05/15/2011 4:23:36 PM PDT by
airborne
(Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
If Paul walked his talk he’d be great.
He opposed the states right of AZ and their SB1070 Bill.
161 posted on
05/15/2011 6:37:02 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(Unless Reagan rises from the dead, we can easily find at least one reason to skip a leading GOPer.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
That “Constitutionalist” will not get the nod...it is an impossibility.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson