Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Wallace sounded every bit, like a liberal, "interviewing" Paul. Honestly he sounded every bit the MSM talking points reader.

Interview?

More like interrogate.

Every talking point, was anti-freedom and pro-regulation.

Chris Wallace, this FReeper is quite disappointed, and you have just thrown my vote the other way you clearly intended.

Freedom is not some vague concept. Freedom is not about heroin. Freedom is not about red herrings.

Freedom is AMERICA.

1 posted on 05/15/2011 11:34:58 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Cringing Negativism Network

Paul is a NUT and will not/ can not be taken seriously.


2 posted on 05/15/2011 11:40:39 AM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
If Palin doesn't run, Paul has my vote.

RuPaul wouldn't have approved the bin Laden raid.

He isn't fit to be president. Period.

3 posted on 05/15/2011 11:40:48 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

7 posted on 05/15/2011 11:45:32 AM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Paul is best to be placed in cabinet level position with enough power to attack the fed the audit the living crap out of it.

Any other position including president he is wasted on.


10 posted on 05/15/2011 11:49:08 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

The man’s in his me -70’s. He’s a Truther who blames America for 9/11. He’s against any form of national defense. You want this nut case to be president? Do you really have a clue about him?


13 posted on 05/15/2011 11:52:11 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Two words: No. Way.


15 posted on 05/15/2011 11:53:50 AM PDT by Ladysmith ("There is no right that allows one person to place a burden on another." - Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Ron Paul did a 180 on immigration, and is now a totally open-borders guy. This comes after a career of being “pro-life” but consistently finding an excuse to vote with the party of death. I don’t trust him further than I could throw him.


17 posted on 05/15/2011 11:57:51 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

He’s quite the porker. http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/12/18/ron-paul-attempts-to-pork-out-on-american-taxpayers/


20 posted on 05/15/2011 11:59:10 AM PDT by manic4organic (We won. Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Chris Wallace is Mike “60Minutes” Wallace’s son. How could anyone even dare to think this man would be objective? He spends most of his time trying to hide the fact he’s a friggin liberal. Fox News should be ashamed of giving this simp a forum.


22 posted on 05/15/2011 11:59:36 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Maybe he’ll get 3.5% of the vote this time around.


23 posted on 05/15/2011 12:00:10 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network; BlackElk; Allegra

Enjoy your shrimp cocktail.


29 posted on 05/15/2011 12:06:23 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Paul is going to need his liberal hat back after the campaign again. I hope Wallace gives it back to him...


34 posted on 05/15/2011 12:15:19 PM PDT by Ingtar (Together we go broke (from a Pookie18 post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

also is chris walllace really a liberal? I know him only that he was the guy who interviewed the gop candidates for 2008 and I didn’t like his smug personality


39 posted on 05/15/2011 12:19:02 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

There is such a thing as a brain-dead libertarian and Ron Paul qualifies on all points. He’s absolutist as well as disorganized in his speech. I can make a good case that he is schizophrenic.


41 posted on 05/15/2011 12:21:08 PM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Ron Paul is believed to be a “fiscal conservative” and if you ask him he will tell you that he has never voted for an earmark. That statement is 100% correct. What Paul does is to make sure that the earmarks he wants are put into a bill, and then he votes against the bill. Its the best of all possible worlds. He gets to bring home the bacon on a local basis and makes the anti-earmark claim on a national basis.

http://www.redstate.com/jeffdunetz/2010/04/14/the-hypocrisy-of-congressman-ron-paul/

45 posted on 05/15/2011 12:27:07 PM PDT by McGruff (When it comes to Obama's birth certificate. Trust, but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Really? You’ll vote for a guy that thinks killing OBL was not necessary?


50 posted on 05/15/2011 12:29:58 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

If under the most unlikely circumstances Ron Paul manages to win the Republican nomination, I’ll support him a 1000 percent. I would do no less for my garbage man. I honestly don’t know who I want to win the nomination at this point in time. Sarah, Michelle, Herman, are among my favorites at the moment. There could be others before I settle in on one.


57 posted on 05/15/2011 12:43:57 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Ron Paul is OLD! He would be the oldest man ever elected President. Occasionally his mind is already starting to go wobbly. No Thanks!


58 posted on 05/15/2011 12:48:22 PM PDT by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
So Paul came across like the NUT that he is and that turned you on??? You need help, and soon. He spews Freedom and Constitution and then ruins it all with his idiocy.
59 posted on 05/15/2011 12:49:04 PM PDT by fish hawk (Obama = "low-level socialist organizer". Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

A vote for Paul = a vote for Obama....period! The next election will depend heavily on clear rational thinking and not on wasted votes by weak canidates or independant 3rd parties. Ron Paul only had about 5 percent of the vote on the last election. Why in the world would anyone stay in any race with 100 percent no chance to win and clearly losing poll numbers and clearly knowing that he is helping the opposition? Just sayin.


64 posted on 05/15/2011 12:53:12 PM PDT by rwoodward ("god, guns and more ammo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson