Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

19 Reasons Why The Federal Reserve Is At The Heart Of Our Economic Problems
The Economic Collapse ^ | 04/02/2011 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 04/02/2011 5:19:45 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Most Americans do not understand what the Federal Reserve is or why it is at the heart of our economic problems. When Americans get into discussions about the economy, most of them still blame either the Democrats or the Republicans for inflation, for the housing crash, for our rampant unemployment and for the national debt. But the truth is that the institution with the most power over our economic system is the Federal Reserve. So exactly what is the Federal Reserve? Most people would say that it is an agency of the federal government. But that is absolutely not true. In fact, the Federal Reserve itself has argued in court that it is not an agency of the federal government. Rather, the Federal Reserve is a privately-owned banking cartel that has been given a perpetual monopoly over our monetary system by the U.S. Congress. This privately-owned central bank has been destroying the value of the U.S. dollar for decades, it has run our economy into the ground and it has driven the U.S. government to the brink of bankruptcy. The Federal Reserve operates in great secrecy, it has never been subjected to a comprehensive audit and it is not accountable to the American people. Yet the decisions that the Federal Reserve makes have a dramatic impact on the lives of every single American citizen.

If you really want to understand what is causing our economic problems, it is absolutely crucial that you understand exactly what the Federal Reserve system is and how it is systematically destroying our economy. Once you understand the truth about the Federal Reserve, you will view economic issues a whole lot differently.

The following are 19 reasons why the Federal Reserve is at the very heart of our economic problems....

#1 The Federal Reserve system is a debt-based financial system.

The way our system is designed, normally no money comes into existence without more debt being created.

But this creates a huge problem, because when a new dollar is created, the interest owed to the banking system on that dollar is not also created at the same time.

Therefore, the amount money that is created is not equal to the larger amount of debt that is also created.

This is a Ponzi scheme that is designed to drain wealth from the American people and transfer it to the banking system.

Today, the amount of debt in our economic system is far, far, far greater than the total amount of money.

The only way to keep the game going is to create even more money which creates even more debt.

#2 The Federal Reserve and the bankers have a monopoly on the creation of this debt-based money.

In the United States today, the only people that can create money are the bankers.

You cannot create money.

You would go to jail if you tried.

Even the U.S. government cannot create money.

Although the U.S. Constitution specifically gives Congress the power to create money, the U.S. Congress has given that power to the Federal Reserve and to the banking system.

This gives them an enormous amount of power.

So how does money creation actually work?

Most Americans don't understand this.

As I have written about previously, the way our system is designed is that all money is supposed to originally come into existence as government debt....

When the government wants more money, the U.S. government swaps U.S. Treasury bonds for "Federal Reserve notes", thus creating more government debt. Usually the money isn't even printed up - most of the time it is just electronically credited to the government. The Federal Reserve creates these "Federal Reserve notes" out of thin air. These Federal Reserve notes are backed by nothing and have no intrinsic value of their own.

The Federal Reserve then sells these U.S. Treasury bonds to investors, other nations (such as China) or sometimes they "sell" them back to themselves. In fact, the Federal Reserve has been gobbling up a whole lot of U.S. Treasuries lately. Some refer to this as "monetizing the debt", but that is not quite an accurate statement.

When the Federal Reserve creates money this way, it does not also create the money to pay the interest on the debt that has been created. Eventually this puts pressure on the U.S. government to borrow even more money to keep the game going. So what this creates is a spiral where the U.S. government must keep borrowing increasingly larger amounts of money, where the money supply is endlessly expanding and where the value of the U.S. dollar is destined to continue going down forever.

Once "Federal Reserve Notes" are in circulation, there is another way that money is created.

It is called "fractional reserve lending".

Once you or I deposit money into a bank, the bank is only required to keep a very small amount of it actually in the bank. The rest of it the bank can loan out to others (at interest of course). This process can be repeated over and over and over, creating more money and an even larger amount of debt.

But the important part to take away from all this is that normally money is only created when debt is created, and the amount of debt to be paid back is always larger than the amount of money created.

This entire system is designed to drain our wealth and to put it into the hands of the bankers.

#3 The power of money creation and debt creation is in the hands of private individuals - not the government.

The Federal Reserve claims that it is an "entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects."

That sounds so reasonable, but the truth is that the Federal Reserve is a legalized banking cartel that is privately-owned.

In fact, the Federal Reserve is about as "federal" as Federal Express is.

In defending itself against a Bloomberg request for information under the Freedom of Information Act, the Federal Reserve objected by declaring that it was "not an agency" of the U.S. government and therefore it was not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. It is kind of funny how Fed officials are always talking about how important their "independence" is, but whenever anyone starts criticizing them for being private they start stressing their ties with the government.

So who owns the Federal Reserve?

As the Federal Reserve's own website describes, it is the member banks that own it....

The twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, which were established by Congress as the operating arms of the nation's central banking system, are organized much like private corporations--possibly leading to some confusion about "ownership." For example, the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks. However, owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. The stock may not be sold, traded, or pledged as security for a loan; dividends are, by law, 6 percent per year.

In particular, as we will see below, the banks of the New York Federal Reserve have the most influence over the system.

So who owns the member banks?

Well, when you trace the ownership of the member banks to the very top you find that the international banking elite are very strongly represented.

#4 The Federal Reserve itself is not much of a profit-making institution. Rather, it is a tool that enables others to make obscene amounts of money.

There are many that think of the Federal Reserve as an evil profit-making machine. But the truth is that the Fed doesn't make that much money. Rather, the system was set up so that others could make an obscene amount of money from U.S. government debt.

Many of those opposed to the Federal Reserve point to the record $80.9 billion in profits that the Federal Reserve made last year as evidence that they are robbing the American people blind. But then those defending the Federal Reserve will point out that the Fed returned $78.4 billion to the U.S. Treasury.

In the end, those numbers are not nearly as important as the hundreds of billions of dollars in interest that are made off of U.S. government debt each year.

If the U.S. government had been issuing debt-free money all this time, the U.S. government would likely not be spending one penny on interest payments. Instead, the U.S. government spent over 413 billion dollars on interest on the national debt during fiscal 2010. This is money that belonged to U.S. taxpayers that was transferred to the U.S. government which in turn was transferred to wealthy international bankers and other foreign governments.

This is where the magic of the Federal Reserve system is. It is in getting the U.S. government enslaved to debt and using that debt to transfer hundreds of billions of dollars of our wealth into the hands of others.

As interest rates go up, this phenomenon is going to become even more brutal. Right now it is being projected that the U.S. government will be paying 900 billion dollars just in interest on the national debt by the year 2019.

As you fill out your tax return this year, just keep in mind that vast quantities of our money is going to pay interest on debt that the U.S. government never needed to become enslaved to.

There are some very happy people out there that are becoming fabulously wealthy at our expense.

What a system, eh?

#5 The Federal Reserve is a perpetual debt machine.

As mentioned above, the U.S. government is enslaved to debt.

So how did it get enslaved?

Well, instead of printing up and spending the money that it needs, the U.S. government borrows it through the Federal Reserve system at interest.

In fact, as noted above, the U.S. government cannot create a single new dollar without borrowing it.

But each new dollar that the U.S. government borrows creates more than a dollar of new debt.

As a result, the government eventually has to collect more in taxes than what it has borrowed.

This phenomenon creates an endless debt spiral.

And is that not what we have in the United States today? In fact, you see this in almost every nation on earth where a similar central banking system has been established.

Did you know that the U.S. national debt is more than 5,000 times larger than it was 100 years ago?

That's right - back in 1910, prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the national debt was only about $2.6 billion.

The only way that the U.S. government can inject more money into the economy is by going into more debt. But when new government debt is created, the amount of money to pay the interest on that debt is not also created. In this way, it was intended by the international bankers that U.S. government debt would expand indefinitely and the U.S. money supply would also expand indefinitely. In the process, the international bankers would become insanely wealthy by lending money to the U.S. government.

However, things did not have to turn out this way.

If the Federal Reserve had never been created, and the U.S. government had been issuing debt-free currency all this time, it is entirely conceivable that we would have absolutely no federal government debt at this point.

Unfortunately, we are now trapped in a debt-based system.

The U.S. national debt simply cannot ever be paid off. U.S. government debt has been mathematically designed to expand forever. It is a trap from which there is no escape.

Sadly, we have now gotten to a terminal phase of the debt spiral. The Congressional Budget Office is projecting that U.S. government debt held by the public will reach a staggering 716 percent of GDP by the year 2080. Remember when I used the term "debt spiral" earlier? This is what a debt spiral looks like....

#6 The Federal Reserve system is designed to cause inflation.

As U.S. government debt expands at an exponential pace, it inevitably causes inflation.

Most Americans believe that inflation is a fact of life, but the truth is that the United States has only had a major, ongoing problem with inflation since the Federal Reserve was created back in 1913.

Sadly, the U.S. dollar has lost well over 95 percent of its value since the Federal Reserve was created.

If the Federal Reserve did not exist, it is theoretically conceivable that we could have an economy with little to no inflation. Of course that would greatly depend on the discipline of our government officials (which is not very great at this point), but the sad truth is that our current system is always going to produce inflation. In fact, the Federal Reserve system was originally designed to be inflationary. Just check out the inflation chart posted below. The U.S. never had massive problems with inflation before the Fed was created, but now it is just wildly out of control....

#7 The Federal Reserve has decided to play bizarre games with our money supply.

In a desperate attempt to revive the dying U.S. economy, the Federal Reserve has resorted to chucking gigantic quantities of cash into the financial system.

Remember how earlier I explained that normally whenever new money is created that more debt is created?

Well, lately the Fed has been resorting to a trick called "quantitative easing". What "quantitative easing" means is that the Federal Reserve zaps massive amounts of money into existence out of thin air and starts spending it on anything that it wants to buy. Lately, this has primarily been done to buy up U.S. government debt.

But isn't that "monetizing the debt"?

Of course it is, and it is a blatant Ponzi scheme.

However, what is even more alarming is what this is doing to our money supply.

Just look at what has happened to our monetary base since about mid-2008....

Does anyone in their right mind believe that this is not going to cause horrible inflation?

Right now most of the new cash is tied up in the financial system, but once it gets out into the regular economy watch out!

#8 The Federal Reserve is undemocratic.

In a previous article, I asked the following question:

"So what makes the central economic planning that the Federal Reserve does different from the central economic planning that communist China does?"

In both cases, a bunch of unelected elitists run the economy and make important economic decisions for the rest of us.

So what really is the difference?

#9 The Federal Reserve runs the U.S. economy.

Most Americans want to blame Obama or Bush or the U.S. Congress for the state of the economy.

But the truth is that it is the Federal Reserve that sets interest rates, it is the Federal Reserve that determines the money supply, it is the Federal Reserve that sets the "target rate" of inflation, it is the Federal Reserve that determines if unemployment is too high or too low and it is the Federal Reserve that watches over all of our banks.

Yes, Obama, Bush and the U.S. Congress all have things to answer for as well.

But none of them have the direct power over the economy that the Federal Reserve does.

#10 The Federal Reserve favors the big banks.

Not all financial institutions are treated equally by the Fed.

The truth is that the big banks (particularly those on Wall Street) are treated with great favor by the Federal Reserve.

If the Federal Reserve did not exist, the big Wall Street banks would not have such an overwhelming advantage. Most Americans simply have no idea that over the last several years the Federal Reserve has been giving gigantic piles of nearly interest-free money to the big Wall Street banks which they turned right around and started lending to the federal government at a much higher rate of return. I don't know about you, but if I was allowed to do that I could make a whole bunch of money very quickly. In fact, it has come out that the Federal Reserve made over $9 trillion in overnight loans to major banks, large financial institutions and other "friends" during the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009.

Wouldn't you like to be able to zap trillions of dollars into existence and loan it out to your friends at very favorable terms?

Sadly, most of the "help" from the Federal Reserve always seems to go to the big boys.

When "small enough to fail" banks need assistance, they are usually told to go sell themselves to one of the big banks.

#11 The worse the debt problems caused by the Federal Reserve become, the more money the IRS needs to collect from the rest of us.

If the U.S. government could issue debt-free money, it is conceivable that we would not even need the IRS. You doubt this? Well, the truth is that the United States did just fine for well over a hundred years without a national income tax. But about the same time the Federal Reserve was created a national income tax was instituted as well. The whole idea was that the wealth of the American people would be transferred to the U.S. government by force and then transferred into the hands of the ultra-wealthy in the form of interest payments.

If the Federal Reserve was shut down, it is entirely possible that we would be able to shut down the IRS as well.

But the only way that the current system works is if massive amounts of wealth continue to be drained from the American people.

#12 The Federal Reserve creates artificial financial bubbles.

When you look back over the last several decades, you will find financial bubble after financial bubble.

So who created all of those bubbles?

It was the Federal Reserve.

The ridiculous policies of Greenspan and Bernanke have wrought disaster after disaster and yet most of our politicians still will not even consider major changes to the Federal Reserve.

#13 The Federal Reserve is anti-free market.

In a true free market system, the marketplace would determine what interest rates are.

In a true free market system, the marketplace would determine which financial institutions survive.

In a true free market system, artificial financial bubbles would be far less likely.

But we don't have a true free market system.

#14 The Federal Reserve tells the rest of the our banks what to do.

Most Americans don't understand just how much power the Federal Reserve actually has over our local banks.

For example, just last year Federal Reserve officials walked into one bank in Oklahoma and demanded that they take down all the Bible verses and all the Christmas buttons that the bank had been displaying.

#15 The people currently running the Federal Reserve pretty much have no idea what they are doing.

In case anyone has not noticed, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has a very long track record of incompetence. Nearly every major judgment that he has made since taking over that position has been dead wrong.

If one of us could go down the street and appoint the manager of the local Dairy Queen as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, it is very doubtful that person would do a worse job than Bernanke has done.

#16 Even though the Federal Reserve has such extraordinary power over the financial system, the American people are not permitted to examine their books.

The Federal Reserve claims that they are regularly audited, but when some members of Congress attempted to push through a true comprehensive audit of the Fed last year Federal Reserve officials threw a hissy fit.

The truth is that the Federal Reserve has never undergone a true comprehensive audit since it was created back in 1913.

Whenever the subject of an audit comes up, Bernanke and others at the Fed keep repeating the mantra of how important "the independence of the Federal Reserve" is.

Sadly, Ron Paul’s proposal to audit the Federal Reserve last year, which had previously been co-sponsored by 320 members of the U.S. House of Representatives, ultimately failed by a vote of 229-198.

Instead, a very, very limited examination of Fed transactions that occurred during the recent financial crisis was approved.

So what did that limited examination reveal?

Well, the Federal Reserve was forced to reveal the details of 21,000 transactions stretching from December 2007 to July 2010 that combined were worth trillions of dollars. It turns out that the Federal Reserve was just handing out gigantic piles of nearly interest-free cash to their friends at the largest banks, financial institutions and corporations all over the globe.

Many members of Congress were absolutely stunned by these revelations.

So what would a more comprehensive audit reveal?

#17 The Federal Reserve has way too much power.

If the Federal Reserve did not exist, we would not have an unelected, unaccountable "fourth branch of government" running around that has gotten completely and totally out of control. Even some members of Congress are now openly complaining about how much power the Fed has. For example, Ron Paul told MSNBC last year that he believes that the Federal Reserve is now more powerful than Congress.....

"The regulations should be on the Federal Reserve. We should have transparency of the Federal Reserve. They can create trillions of dollars to bail out their friends, and we don’t even have any transparency of this. They’re more powerful than the Congress."

#18 The Federal Reserve is dominated by Wall Street and the New York banks.

The New York representative is the only permanent member of the Federal Open Market Committee, while other regional banks rotate in 2 and 3 year intervals. The former head of the New York Fed, Timothy Geithner, is now U.S. Treasury Secretary. The truth is that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has always been the most important of the regional Fed banks by far, and in turn the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has always been dominated by Wall Street and the major New York banks.

The cold, hard reality of the matter is that the Federal Reserve is just another one of the tools that the Wall Street banking elite use to dominate all the rest of us.

#19 The Federal Reserve has brought us to the brink of economic collapse.

If the Federal Reserve had never been created, the American people would not be so enslaved to debt. At the very core of our economic problems is debt. American consumers are swamped with debt, state and local governments are facing horrific debt problems from coast to coast and the federal government has piled up the biggest mountain of debt in the history of the world.

We are living in an absolutely massive debt bubble, and when it bursts the world is going to experience financial chaos like it has never seen before.

Things did not have to turn out this way. We did not have to adopt a debt-based financial system. We did not have to allow the bankers to enslave us with debt.

But that is what happened.

Sadly, most Americans and the vast majority of our politicians are still clueless about these issues.

In 1922, Henry Ford wrote the following....

"The people must be helped to think naturally about money. They must be told what it is, and what makes it money, and what are the possible tricks of the present system which put nations and peoples under control of the few."

Hopefully this article will help people understand our debt-based financial system a little bit better.

Until we fundamentally change our system, many of the economic and financial problems we are currently experiencing will never go away.

Thankfully, it does appear that some Americans are waking up.

According to a recent Bloomberg National Poll, the number of Americans that would like to see the Federal Reserve held more accountable or even completely abolished is increasing....

Asked if the central bank should be more accountable to Congress, left independent or abolished entirely, 39 percent said it should be held more accountable and 16 percent that it should be abolished. Only 37 percent favor the status quo.

Those are very exciting numbers.

Hopefully we can awaken many more Americans to the dangers of a debt-based economy.

In the book of Proverbs, it tells us the following....

The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.

Well, by allowing ourselves to become enslaved to debt, we have become the servants of the international banking system.

Not only that, we have also sold our children and our grandchildren into perpetual debt slavery.

Thomas Jefferson tried to warn us about this.

He believed that when the government borrows money in one generation which must be paid back by future generations it is equivalent to stealing....

And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.

In fact, Thomas Jefferson said that if he could add one more amendment to the U.S. Constitution it would be a ban on all government borrowing....

I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution. I would be willing to depend on that alone for the reduction of the administration of our government to the genuine principles of its Constitution; I mean an additional article, taking from the federal government the power of borrowing.

Where would we be today if we had listened to Thomas Jefferson?

The amount of government debt that we have racked up is a great evil. We have stolen the future away from our children and our grandchildren. We have put them in a position where they will spend the rest of their lives paying off our debts to the bankers.

We owe it to future generations to fix the problems that we have created.

That is why so many of us believe that it is time for the U.S. Congress to shut down the Federal Reserve. Our current financial system is a complete and utter failure and we need to start over.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: debt; economy; federalreserve; inflation; tinfoilheadware
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Black_Shark

Ok, I have some time.

IMHO...

Bank customers are legal, financial entities, which are either businesses or people. There is no other choice. More customers with more money = more sales.

The more money people have, the more money business can make. The more money banks can make. So no bank wants to keep people poor. A “wealthy” town, one with wealthy citizens, attracts banks and all businesses. You can’t make any money by transacting business with a person who does not have a pot to piss in.

Is the Fed creating too much liquidity now, yes. It’s out of stupidity, not a conspiracy.

Is the Fed allowing banks to make obscenely high profits ?
Banks net income % is reasonable; I’d say it would be very odd to find a bank with a net income larger than 20% of it’s top line, though I stand corrected as I don’t follow such things. Probably around 10% is considered a good number, the past two years anything postive would be considered good. Many are running losses. So if the Fed is in a grand conspiracy, it certainly is working to the detriment of U.S. banks.

Austrian economics has many things right, but there are many moving parts to economics and there is a lot of pseudo-intellectual hype connected with it nowadays, just as much as keynesian. I had some econ courses in college, and after 20 years of business experience, much of that in financial reporting, I understand now why academicians such as economists typically are could benefit greatly from getting “out in the world of other business operations” more.

The economic system is affected by things like the invention of a new product that everyone wants, which has nothing at all to do with cycles, interest rates, money supply or anything. It just appears when johnny gets an idea and then builds it and sells it.

My famous example is the 1990’s. The “boom” was solely caused by IT spending that ran wild due to client-server software, the web and Y2K all happening in the same decade. I was there. The guy I was working with in 1999 also knew it: there was going to be a long, painful decline starting in Feb. of 2000 when every IT project ended and no new ones started. Economists had no idea what was going on. Venture capitalists were morons throwing $40 million at literally anything. Clinton was literally sleeping on the job, no clue. Congress and no clue. The Fed had no clue. Get this: even the airlines, who also internally were implementing the SAME SOFTWARE, apparently did not realize that probably 1/3 of the customers in the seats of their planes - were implementing the SAME SOFTWARE for other companies. Did they not realize that everyone’s Y2K work would end at - gee - 1/1/200 ? And that was the only thing keeping this huge part of their customer base in the air ? It wasn’t massive unemployment, it was just the highly-paid people throwing money around. The housebuilders, restaurants and stores all slowed down because no mo’ money was being thrown around, it the trickle-down just stopped tricklen’.

I saw projects with 40 new graduates with zero experience in a room billing at $400,000 per year (costing mabye $120k), all doing basically nothing. That’s a stimulus. And it was all because of idiocy: in-house IT departments were clueless about the work that had to be done, so capable people in the early 90’s started leaving and coming back as consultants somewhere else. And it just snowballed. Finally, towards the end, with the deadline looming and web vulture capital going wild, there was virtually no limit to money being thrown around.

When it collapsed, then 9/11 dampened everything more, Mr. Greenspan didn’t know, he did the keynesian whatever and tried to coax more economic activity by lowering interest rates. But the IT projects were done !

The rest is history, house flipping as the low rates and bad stock market, r/e overbuilding, bad underwriting, defaults, package up into CDO’s and sell all over the world to “spread the risk” (i.e., cross fingers), bailout the CDO buyers... and still, they have not a clue.

It all comes down to unions, regulation, taxes, schools, morals. We’re back to only having jobs where there are true jobs to be done. And guess what, many are gone and are not coming back. I have seen with my own eyes what it was like to run a small manufacturing business in the 1970’s. From the inside. I’ve seen all the changes in the business environment since then. That’s the problem.

The Fed controlling the economy is like flying an airplane using only the throttle. Better hope there’s no wind.


21 posted on 04/03/2011 1:12:11 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (Huguenot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers
That is a fact well known to Austrian Economists.

I'm skeptical that any"one" human understands what is happening here now. (I've read Von Misses and don't think the Gnomes of Zuric or Austria are as brilliant as they think and say they are) The foreign currencies are in much worse shape than ours, and many foreign countries are in worse shape than the U.S. as far as cultural stablity.

The Fed is trying to reflate the deflation caused by the loss of confidence. They tried to "buy off" the foreigners holding our paper with the bail-out.

If the U.S. collapses, it will be due to our own internal moral and political corruption.

22 posted on 04/03/2011 5:49:35 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

for reference


23 posted on 04/03/2011 6:16:07 AM PDT by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; SunkenCiv
"That is why so many of us believe that it is time for the U.S. Congress to shut down the Federal Reserve. Our current financial system is a complete and utter failure and we need to start over."

Everyone who has taken on the Federal Reserve has been assassinated. The "murder-you-if-you-threaten-our-ponzi-scheme," banking types have but to whisper in a few congressional and senatorial ears, and the entire plan will go *poof*.

They're going ride this mule all the way into the ground.

24 posted on 04/03/2011 7:05:56 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
#13 The Federal Reserve is anti-free market.

In a true free market system, the marketplace would determine what interest rates are.

If the Fed used the market based yield curve to determine rates, our economy would work so much better.

25 posted on 04/03/2011 7:15:33 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average. Politicians come from the other half.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

I dont’ disagree with most of your points.

The Austrian School appears more well grounded than the Kenysians, because the Kenysian School is pure fantasy. But the main factor that is not quantifiable is the response of cultures and people to economic policies. This is the main reason why economics CAN’T be a science.

Yes, the Fed is trying to reflate a deflation, which is still out there. But the cause of that deflation is the CDS, MBS and REMIC that were being treated as insurance and weren’t. They blew up. In fact, their total notional value is unknown. THAT causes a lot of loss of confidence. Look at Iceland. It was their conservative party who listened to our WallStreet, and had leveraged their banks to 900% of their GDP. We don’t have a clue how much leverage our own banks have, never mind compared to GDP.

“If the U.S. collapses, it will be due to our own internal moral and political corruption.”

There is NO DOUBT about that. I see nothing on the horizon to stop it either.


26 posted on 04/03/2011 7:20:33 AM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Quix; Joya; M. Espinola
Great article ! Thanks for posting . . .

Now for those people like me who enjoy lists here is another one:

A List Of 28 Things That Will Make You Think That There Is Something Seriously Wrong With This Country

But # 28 caught my eye -- According to the National Inflation Association, when you factor in the unfunded liabilities of the U.S. government, total federal debt obligations now come to a grand total of 76 trillion dollars

27 posted on 04/03/2011 8:12:41 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Points taken.

I disagree with your claim that Banks rely on people/businesses. While smaller banks may rely on people, larger banks now rely on investing to generate wealth (And create more money to put into the system).

The Fed IS allowing the large banks ( BOA, etc) to make obscene profits. Its a great thing to be able to borrow money from the Fed at an extremely small interest rate and turn around and lend it right back to em at a very large interest rate. While this may not apply to the smaller banks, the larger banks are most def. taking advantage of this (who wouldn’t?). Your right in that the Fed is not working to hurt the large banks. They are actively trying to help them.

In regards to your comment about “Intellectuals” I COMPLETELY agree! I hate professors who have never left their “Ivory Towers” because they generally have no clue what they are talking about. The vast majority of my education has come from sources closely linked to the investing world and self-study. When it comes to education, it is always better to listen to the man who has “been there, done that” than the man who just observes and creates theories out of his a**.

In your 1990’s example I think that you are assuming that the Fed was “clueless”. I personally think they knew EXACTLY what was going on and created their policies accordingly. Nothing happens in this day and age that isn’t part of a bigger plan. While the government may have been clueless, NOTHING happens in this economy that the Fed isn’t aware of. The Fed is the giant gorilla in the room that no one wants to acknowledge is there. Now Clinton, he just wanted a** so your probably right that he was clueless :P

Greenspan knew what he was doing, at least according to Keynesian Theory. In times of recession, if the Fed creates more money, government spending goes up which then increases output and lowers unemployment while causing a steady increase in inflation. (Keynesian in a nutshell). Problem is that we can’t create more money without creating more debt. (As the article states). Thus, the more we spend the more debt that we create, etc etc. Eventually, we get 2008.

It’s only going to get worse. 2011 is going to make 2008 look like a warmup. Batten down the hatches and hang on!


28 posted on 04/03/2011 1:42:26 PM PDT by Black_Shark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Black_Shark

I forgot to say that in regards to government spending creates higher output, this is only in the short run.


29 posted on 04/03/2011 1:44:28 PM PDT by Black_Shark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

thx thx

HIDEOUS.


30 posted on 04/03/2011 4:13:23 PM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson