Skip to comments.
No evidence of time before Big Bang
Nature ^
| 12/10/10
| Edwin Cartlidge
Posted on 12/12/2010 8:51:25 AM PST by LibWhacker
Latest research deflates the idea that the Universe cycles for eternity.
Our view of the early Universe may be full of mysterious circles and even triangles but that doesn't mean we're seeing evidence of events that took place before the Big Bang. So says a trio of papers taking aim at a recent claim that concentric rings of uniform temperature within the cosmic microwave background the radiation left over from the Big Bang might, in fact, be the signatures of black holes colliding in a previous cosmic 'aeon' that existed before our Universe.
(Excerpt) Read more at nature.com ...
TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: background; bigbang; cosmic; microwave; penrose; science; steadystatetheory; stringtheory; time; universe; wmap; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: LibWhacker
But, it takes a licking and keeps on ticking.
2
posted on
12/12/2010 8:55:13 AM PST
by
righttackle44
(I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
To: LibWhacker
There was no “aeon” before the universe. There is only one universe. Discussing “time” before the universe is meaningless.
They still don’t have a clue.
3
posted on
12/12/2010 8:55:35 AM PST
by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(Liberalism is against human nature. Practicing liberalism is detrimental to your mental stability.)
To: LibWhacker
What a coinkydink! Something in common with Obama’s birth certificate! /s
4
posted on
12/12/2010 9:02:14 AM PST
by
pillut48
(Israel doesn't have a friend in President Obama...and neither does the USA! (h/t pgkdan))
To: LibWhacker
Well, the evidence of the Big Bang itself is only circumstantial.
5
posted on
12/12/2010 9:07:59 AM PST
by
Brilliant
To: LibWhacker
Actually, those rings are from the stump left when an evil dwarf chopped down the great tree Yggdrasil.
6
posted on
12/12/2010 9:08:31 AM PST
by
dr_who
To: LibWhacker
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
7
posted on
12/12/2010 9:17:33 AM PST
by
Flag_This
(Real presidents don't bow.)
To: LibWhacker
didn’t a guy win a Nobel prize for that “discovery” they are casting doubt on??
8
posted on
12/12/2010 9:20:59 AM PST
by
GeronL
(#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged
There is only one universe. Discussing time before the universe is meaningless. I'm not sure about the "only one" assertion but the "meaningless" assertion is undoubtedly correct for any number of good reasons. At the moment of creation, the big bang if you will, total entropy was zero. That would prevent any possible transfer of information post BB.
Regards,
GtG
9
posted on
12/12/2010 9:25:40 AM PST
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: Gandalf_The_Gray
10
posted on
12/12/2010 9:29:11 AM PST
by
Michael Barnes
(Guilty of being White.)
To: LibWhacker
The used to call “big bangs” orgies back in the day.
11
posted on
12/12/2010 9:30:42 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: SunkenCiv
12
posted on
12/12/2010 9:32:58 AM PST
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: LibWhacker
"Our view of the early Universe may be full of mysterious circles "
Seen those here on Earth.
13
posted on
12/12/2010 9:41:20 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: LibWhacker
Before Thyme there was Rosemary!
14
posted on
12/12/2010 9:43:31 AM PST
by
Young Werther
("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged
No doubt, but if that hypothesis is wrong then how about this one ~ those are MOUNTING BRACKETS
15
posted on
12/12/2010 9:50:19 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: LibWhacker
This is true.
The BIG CLOCK came right AFTER the BIG BANG.
16
posted on
12/12/2010 9:50:21 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: Young Werther
Oh, you’re just sayin’ that ‘cause of your Lemon Zest.
17
posted on
12/12/2010 9:54:15 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: dr_who
It is obvious you’ve lost too much life before the Goblin Fire.
18
posted on
12/12/2010 9:56:36 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: LibWhacker
One of the titles of God is ‘Creator’. A creator presupposes a creation. If God the Creator is eternal then the universe, in some fashion or form, must also be eternal.
19
posted on
12/12/2010 10:05:21 AM PST
by
JPG
(Sarah dedicated her new book to Trig: "I'm glad you're here.")
To: GeronL
Posited by Penrose and Gurzadyan only very recently. No time for Nobels yet.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson