Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/12/2010 8:51:28 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
But, it takes a licking and keeps on ticking.
2 posted on 12/12/2010 8:55:13 AM PST by righttackle44 (I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

There was no “aeon” before the universe. There is only one universe. Discussing “time” before the universe is meaningless.
They still don’t have a clue.


3 posted on 12/12/2010 8:55:35 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Liberalism is against human nature. Practicing liberalism is detrimental to your mental stability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

What a coinkydink! Something in common with Obama’s birth certificate! /s


4 posted on 12/12/2010 9:02:14 AM PST by pillut48 (Israel doesn't have a friend in President Obama...and neither does the USA! (h/t pgkdan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Well, the evidence of the Big Bang itself is only circumstantial.


5 posted on 12/12/2010 9:07:59 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Actually, those rings are from the stump left when an evil dwarf chopped down the great tree Yggdrasil.


6 posted on 12/12/2010 9:08:31 AM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?


7 posted on 12/12/2010 9:17:33 AM PST by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

didn’t a guy win a Nobel prize for that “discovery” they are casting doubt on??


8 posted on 12/12/2010 9:20:59 AM PST by GeronL (#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The used to call “big bangs” orgies back in the day.


11 posted on 12/12/2010 9:30:42 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
"Our view of the early Universe may be full of mysterious circles "

Seen those here on Earth.


13 posted on 12/12/2010 9:41:20 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Before Thyme there was Rosemary!


14 posted on 12/12/2010 9:43:31 AM PST by Young Werther ("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

This is true.

The BIG CLOCK came right AFTER the BIG BANG.


16 posted on 12/12/2010 9:50:21 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
One of the titles of God is ‘Creator’. A creator presupposes a creation. If God the Creator is eternal then the universe, in some fashion or form, must also be eternal.
19 posted on 12/12/2010 10:05:21 AM PST by JPG (Sarah dedicated her new book to Trig: "I'm glad you're here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
The 'concept' of time has always fascinated me. What ever 'force' or 'being' created both us and the universe gave us atomic particles that can decay in milliseconds; our individual lives are measured in mere years; and the universe as far as we have determined at this point is roughly 14 or 15 billion years old.

How can that be? What is the purpose of creating a life form that exists mere years in a universe that will continue for perhaps billions of years or forever?

Very strange.

23 posted on 12/12/2010 10:45:43 AM PST by Doc Savage (Stay Thirsty My Friend!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

save


24 posted on 12/12/2010 10:47:12 AM PST by Texas Songwriter ( ma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Even if information survived the theoretical singularity during the big bang which is questionable. It would be so distorted by a multitude of forces we cannot even model that it’s completely useless.


28 posted on 12/12/2010 11:36:08 AM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
No evidence of doing time before Big Bang -

Sing Sing hadn`t been sung yet.

31 posted on 12/12/2010 12:25:25 PM PST by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
No evidence of Time before Big Bang

No, but I think Newsweek was around.

37 posted on 12/12/2010 2:33:03 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker


Imagine a time ....when there was no time ...when all the MATTER and ENERGY that goes into both you ...me... the waiter ...and this crispy, succulent, delicious apple pie... indeed, all of yumanity ...was compressed into a small singularity Billions and Billions of times smaller than something really friggin' tiny.
42 posted on 12/12/2010 4:00:30 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson