Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10-446 KERCHNER V. OBAMA CERTIORARI DENIED
US. Supreme Court ^ | 11/29/2010

Posted on 11/29/2010 7:37:16 AM PST by Elderberry

(ORDER LIST: 562 U.S.) MONDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2010

CERTIORARI DENIED

10-446 KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; congress; heathcare; military; naturalborncitizen; obama; palin; politics; sarahpalin; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

1 posted on 11/29/2010 7:37:18 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

What does that mean?


2 posted on 11/29/2010 7:39:07 AM PST by nikos1121 (Praying for the big -24 today and -27 by the end of the month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Supreme Court did not request the case file from the lower court.


3 posted on 11/29/2010 7:39:38 AM PST by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Seriously.

You won the “first to post” award, but provided no content for the masses.

;-p


4 posted on 11/29/2010 7:40:03 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

5 posted on 11/29/2010 7:41:31 AM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Anything that could bring Obama down will not be allowed. End of story.


6 posted on 11/29/2010 7:41:41 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Is there a lawyer in the house?


7 posted on 11/29/2010 7:42:01 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

It means that the Supreme Court has refused to review the case.


8 posted on 11/29/2010 7:42:16 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

There’s something happening here...What it is ain’t exactly clear...


9 posted on 11/29/2010 7:43:47 AM PST by Ronbo1948
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Well, this certainly comes as a big surprise. /Sarc


10 posted on 11/29/2010 7:44:34 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

It means that the outlook for justice is 5%.

11 posted on 11/29/2010 7:44:42 AM PST by bvw (No TSA goon will touch MY stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

12 posted on 11/29/2010 7:45:32 AM PST by Conservative Tsunami (2012: "Ich bin ein Tea Party-er!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ronbo1948

Maybe he’s going to step down at 11:35....


13 posted on 11/29/2010 7:45:58 AM PST by brewcrew (Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. --John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Goodbye America, we hardly knew ye...


14 posted on 11/29/2010 7:46:30 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality. Save America From Bankruptcy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Yes—please interpret! Thx.


15 posted on 11/29/2010 7:46:49 AM PST by Silentgypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy

The Supremes continue to evade.


16 posted on 11/29/2010 7:48:34 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

What case?

If it touches on El Presidente, the gutless wonders of the El Supremo ain’t gonna go near.

This is not news.


17 posted on 11/29/2010 7:49:35 AM PST by Ronbo1948
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Did you actually read why they denied it? According to the leftist goons on this court to sum it up what they said in a legal way.. it’s too late. Read it!

I want to say well if it’s too late, then the Supreme Court should never overturn anything because it’s too late. This is the lamest B.S. ruling I have ever read. Look who is in agreement with it too.

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE BREYER, and JUSTICE KAGAN all agree.


18 posted on 11/29/2010 7:50:16 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
It means that the Supreme Court has refused to review the case.

To allow this to go forward would expose the fact that they knew all along. Why do you think Justice Roberts "flubbed" the Oath of Office? Either guilt or guile caused him to issue a nonsensical oath. What Obaba swore to in private, we'll never know.

19 posted on 11/29/2010 7:51:13 AM PST by giotto (DonÂ’t look at the photo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

The Supremos should be tried as traitors to the Republic by a Revolutionary Court!

BUT FIRST THE REVOLUTION!!!


20 posted on 11/29/2010 7:52:56 AM PST by Ronbo1948
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson