Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Elderberry

Did you actually read why they denied it? According to the leftist goons on this court to sum it up what they said in a legal way.. it’s too late. Read it!

I want to say well if it’s too late, then the Supreme Court should never overturn anything because it’s too late. This is the lamest B.S. ruling I have ever read. Look who is in agreement with it too.

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE BREYER, and JUSTICE KAGAN all agree.


18 posted on 11/29/2010 7:50:16 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sprite518

Where did you see that? I don’t see it anywhere on the court link.


25 posted on 11/29/2010 7:59:28 AM PST by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Sprite518

“Did you actually read why they denied it? According to the leftist goons on this court to sum it up what they said in a legal way.. it’s too late. Read it!”

I don’t know how to find it!

Could you paste it for me?

Thanks


26 posted on 11/29/2010 7:59:33 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Sprite518

I thought because of a conflict of interest or what ever it is called, KAGAN had to step aside on this because of the work she did for him!

http://hello-newman55.newsvine.com/_news/2010/08/05/4821083-elena-kagan-tied-to-obamas-birth-certificate

“Here’s the connection. Kagan served as solicitor general of the United States from March 2009 until May of this year.

In that role, she legally represented the U.S. government in numerous cases coming before the Supreme Court.

A simple search of the high court’s own website reveals Kagan’s name coming up at least nine times on dockets involving Obama eligibility issues. “


33 posted on 11/29/2010 8:05:21 AM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Sprite518
"Did you actually read why they denied it? "

It was denied without comment.

"JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE BREYER, and JUSTICE KAGAN all agree."

As do Scalia, Robberts, Thomas and Alito. To grant a petitioner's writ of certiorari, there only needs to be four Justices in agreement, not five. It's known as "the rule of four".

35 posted on 11/29/2010 8:08:16 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Sprite518

There is no opinion, only the denial of the writ of certiorari. In this case, they allowed the amicus brief, then denied the petition. When they deny they say NOTHING. There is nothing to read. Are you referring to previously filed briefs in this case?


47 posted on 11/29/2010 8:39:16 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Sprite518; Elderberry; LucyT
Washington D.C. (District of Corruption) at work!

Nazi Pelosi creates a fraudulent (criminal) certification for Hawaii's DNC who first refused to give "green" light for the illegal alien an usurper pResident's in OUR W.H. NBC status. Congress get fooled by political hack Jack Maskell!!

Eight members of SCOTUS get a "surprise" visit by the usurper on January 14, 2009 and meeting is "telegraphed" to the lower judicial court system of that "threat" to accepting sweeping the Constitutional crisis and justice under the rug!!!

Who knows, maybe the Wiki-Leaks has the goods on Barry Soetoro if even that is one of his real names or person who is "Fundamentally Transforming the United States of America into a Marxist's dictatorship???

52 posted on 11/29/2010 8:49:02 AM PST by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson