What does that mean?
Supreme Court did not request the case file from the lower court.
Anything that could bring Obama down will not be allowed. End of story.
Is there a lawyer in the house?
There’s something happening here...What it is ain’t exactly clear...
Well, this certainly comes as a big surprise. /Sarc
Goodbye America, we hardly knew ye...
Yes—please interpret! Thx.
Did you actually read why they denied it? According to the leftist goons on this court to sum it up what they said in a legal way.. it’s too late. Read it!
I want to say well if it’s too late, then the Supreme Court should never overturn anything because it’s too late. This is the lamest B.S. ruling I have ever read. Look who is in agreement with it too.
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE BREYER, and JUSTICE KAGAN all agree.
This sucks Ping!
I guess in layman’s terms, the SCOTUS won’t touch it with a ten foot pole - forget The Constitution.
“The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.”
The Kerchner case was written as if it was designed to fail. It needlessly raised political and standing issues on which it was bound to fail.
It is a mistake to conclude that just because Kerchner failed, SCOTUS will not rule against BO in the future. In fact lower courts are hearing cases challenging BO on a number of issues. (BOcare, immigration et al)
IMHO, SCOTUS would prefer that congress handle the eligibility issue, but if congress fails to act then SCOTUS will have to resolve the issue.
Since there was no ruling from that court in this case, the SCOTUS cannot hear it. This is the nexus of the disagreements (professional) between Lawyer Donofrio and Lawyer Apuzzo.
Apuzzo believes the SCOTUS should hear the case. Donofrio does not, and accordingly, is trying to get the Federal District Court in DC to issue a Writ of Quo Warranto (IOW, asking "by what right" does a Federal Official hold his office). The progress of Donofrio's effort is the only case worth watching. Donofrio may also be bringing suit to force the State of Hawaii to obey its own laws and release the Birth Certificate.
Donofrio's main point, and Apuzzo's, is that BHO, Jr. cannot be an NBC because his father was not a citizen. The BC would spell this out, but since BHO,Jr. has already admitted as much, its importance is somewhat diminished. The Federal District court of DC would of course, demand it for a Quo Warranto hearing, ending Hawaii's intransigence.
That court, however, is firmly in Obamanite hands, and cannot be forced to have the hearings necessary to grant the Writ and can easily drag out the proceedings until 2012.
Bottom line: BHO, Jr. is the sitting POTUS until 2012, eligible or not.
How are the state initiatives to require birth certificate for all presidential and VP candidates to appear on the ballot? States could also define “naturally born” citizen as an individual with 2 US citizens as parents. This would provoke a SCOTUS challenge if states refused to certify candidates.
This is terrible. This was the most well put together cases to hit the SCOTUS than any other case thus far. It took directly two years for it to reach the SCOTUS from it’s initial filing right before he was inaugurated which gave them standing. This again is bad because if another case was filed, it would take probably two years to make it back to the SCOTUS and by then his 1st term would be up and the Palin will be smoking him in the debates to become the next president. Now with that said, we have another case that is being reintroduced and that is the Hollister case against Obama which was dismissed because a Judge said it was discussed on Twitter.
Twitter Eligibility Case
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=233177
Once again, the entirely predictable happens...
As Richard Feynman would say “Bad luck.”
Kerchner v. Obama: SCOTUS Orders List Due Out Today (inferring it's been dismissed) ^
|
11/28/2010 11:46:15 PM PST · by STARWISE · 26 replies Oh, For Goodness Sake ^ | 11-29-10The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit of New Jersey affirmed the District Court’s dismissal, based on lack of standing and subject matter jurisdiction, of Kerchner v. Obama, calling the case “frivolous” and issuing a Precedential Opinion. Not to be taken lightly: *** [W]hen a judge calls an argument “ridiculous” or “frivolous,” it is absolutely the worst thing the judge could say. It means that the person arguing the position has absolutely no idea of what he is doing, and has completely wasted everyone’s time. *** The case relied, belatedly, on the de Vattel theory of natural born... |
||
|
|
||
| Apuzzo, Supreme Court confers Kerchner v Obama, Limbaugh, Hannity, Dobbs question Obama eligibility ^ |
||
|
11/24/2010 8:14:26 AM PST · by Jonah Vark · 15 replies CITIZEN WELLS NEWS ^ | Citizen WellsSean Hannity, Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaugh have all questioned Obama’s birth certificate, natural born citizen status and eligibility to be president. Yesterday, Rush Limbaugh stated the following on his radio show: “The imposter got into the equivalent of the White House in Afghanistan. Did they not ask this guy for some kind of identification? They clearly didn’t. They clearly didn’t ask this guy for his birth certificate. How in the world could they trust in a leader and even give money to somebody who has not been properly vetted? Well, because it happened here in the United States. We... |
||
|
|
||
| Kerchner v Obama DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010 (re: Barry's eligibility) ^ |
||
|
11/08/2010 12:57:34 PM PST · by rxsid · 195 replies www.supremecourt.gov ^ | 11/08/2010 | SCOTUSNo. 10-446 Title: Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. Docketed: October 4, 2010 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Case Nos.: (09-4209) Decision Date: July 2, 2010 ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010) Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed. Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism.Nov 8... |
||
|
|
||
| Respondents Waive Right to Respond..Petition-Writ of Cert.to(SCOTUS)..Kerchner etal v Obama etal ^ |
||
|
11/06/2010 2:43:29 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 45 replies A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers ^ | 11-6-10 | Mario ApuzzoFull title Respondents Waive the Right to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court for the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Lawsuit ### There is new activity on the U.S. Supreme Court Docket today with an effective date on the docket of 3 Nov 2010. Document HERE.1. The Respondents named in our Petition have waived their right to respond. 2. The Western Center of Journalism has filed a motion for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief in support of our petition. To read the Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court filed... |
||
|
|
||
| Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner ^ |
||
|
10/01/2010 10:41:23 AM PDT · by STARWISE · 203 replies A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers ^ | 9-30-10 | Mario ApuzzoComplete title: Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner et al vs. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Lawsuit ________________________________________ *snip* Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg, NJ, today filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC, on behalf of plaintiffs, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lehigh County, PA; Lowell T. Patterson, Burlington County, NJ; Darrell J. LeNormand, Middlesex County, NJ; and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr., Middlesex County, NJ. Plaintiffs are challenging the recent decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, PA, which affirmed the dismissal by District... |
||
|
|
||
| Petition for Writ of Cert filed with SCOTUS - Kerchner et al vs. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al ^ |
||
|
puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 9/30/2010 | cfkerchner "Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner et al vs. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Lawsuit JAMESBURG, NJ – (Sept. 30, 2010) - Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg, NJ, today filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC, on behalf of plaintiffs, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lehigh County, PA; Lowell T. Patterson, Burlington County, NJ; Darrell J. LeNormand, Middlesex County, NJ; and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr., Middlesex County, NJ. Plaintiffs are challenging the recent decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, PA, which affirmed the... |
||
Remember the photo of The Usurper with the Supremes at the time of the second swearing in? They were all laughing together.
The Supremes know he’s ineligible. O is untouchable, his skin color ensures that. He will someday be outed, and be known as the biggest scammer in the history of the world.
His original BC most likely outs him not only on birthplace but on religion which is islam. He has a lot of reasons to hide his records. All of them. They will not remain hidden forever.