Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Elderberry

This is terrible. This was the most well put together cases to hit the SCOTUS than any other case thus far. It took directly two years for it to reach the SCOTUS from it’s initial filing right before he was inaugurated which gave them standing. This again is bad because if another case was filed, it would take probably two years to make it back to the SCOTUS and by then his 1st term would be up and the Palin will be smoking him in the debates to become the next president. Now with that said, we have another case that is being reintroduced and that is the Hollister case against Obama which was dismissed because a Judge said it was discussed on Twitter.

Twitter Eligibility Case
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=233177


56 posted on 11/29/2010 9:09:49 AM PST by Retired Intelligence Officer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Retired Intelligence Officer

This was the most well put together cases to hit the SCOTUS than any other case thus far.

56 posted on Monday, November 29, 2010 11:09:49 AM by Retired Intelligence Officer


I disagree. The Kerchner case was perhaps the most fatally flawed of all the eligibility cases. It comes as no surprise at all that SCOTUS summarily denied a hearing without comment.


62 posted on 11/29/2010 9:22:15 AM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Intelligence Officer
This was the most well put together cases to hit the SCOTUS than any other case thus far.

The case was a model of its kind. Very well done indeed. However it had been presented in the wrong Federal District Court. In a way, that's a good thing, because when it is presented in the right court, the SCOTUS will have all the less reason to reject it!

These attorneys (including my favorite, the statuesque Russian Lady Dentist Lawyer, Dr. Malapropsky) have been instructed many times by fair-minded judges on how to present their cases. The "how" is in the Federal District Court of Washington DC. The "Why" is that it is the only court Constitutionally empowered to hear eligibility cases.

If that Federal Court in DC gets around to it (there is really no way to pressure them) they will issue a Writ of Quo Warranto,, (which is just lawyer dog-latin for "By what right, " do you hold this office.) forcing Obama to "prove" he is a Natural Born citizen. Or not.

Of course, Team Obama will fight it tooth and nail, But no matter who wins or loses, this has the appeal to the SCOTUS built-in. The SCOTUS is an appeals court.

Although strictly speaking, the SCOTUS could let the lower court ruling stand, (no matter what it was) I think they will finally hear the case. That should be sometime around 2014!

75 posted on 11/29/2010 12:23:59 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Obama. He's Ray Nagin in National Office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson