Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weather balloon data backs up missing decline found in old magazine
Wattsupwiththat.com ^ | March 18, 2010 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 03/18/2010 7:59:03 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/images/mfl/history/kutchenreuter1.jpg

A Rawinsone being prepared for release at the Miami, FL airport - Image: NOAA

Jo Nova has more from Frank Lansner on what older records, this time from weather balloons, tell us about recent adjustments to the temperature record. WUWT readers may recall Rewriting the decline where the graph from National Geographic below raises some questions about temperature graphs today.

Graph 1880 - 1976 NH temperatures
Above: Matthews 1976, National Geographic, Temperatures 1880-1976

Frank Lansner has done some excellent follow-up on the missing “decline” in temperatures from 1940 to 1975, and things get even more interesting. Recall that the original “hide the decline” statement comes from the ClimateGate emails and refers to “hiding” the tree ring data that shows a decline in temperatures after 1960. It’s known as the “divergence problem” because tree rings diverge from the measured temperatures. But Frank shows that the peer reviewed data supports the original graphs and that measured temperature did decline from 1960 onwards, sharply. But in the GISS version of that time-period, temperatures from the cold 1970’s period were repeatedly “adjusted” years after the event, and progressively got warmer.

The most mysterious period is from 1958 to 1978, when a steep 0.3C decline that was initially recorded in the Northern Hemisphere. Years later that was reduced so far it became a mild warming, against the detailed corroborating evidence from rabocore data.

Raobcore measurements are balloon measures. They started in 1958, twenty years before satellites. But when satellites began, the two different methods tie together very neatly–telling us that both of them are accurate, reliable tools.

You can see how similar the data from both methods is:
Comparing Rabocores and Satellites.

So what do the raobcores tell us about the period before satellites started recording temperatures? They make it clear that temperatures fell quickly from 1960-1970.

Rabocore results

The decline in the original graph in National Geographic in 1976 is apparently backed up by highly accurate balloon data, and was based on peer reviewed data:  Budyko 1969 and Angell and Korshover (1975). These two sets overlap from 1958 to 1960, and correlate well, so stitching them together is reasonable thing to do and it doesn’t make much difference which year is chosen from the overlap period (indeed any other choice makes the decline slightly steeper).

What’s thought provoking is that the raobcore data above is for 30N-30S, covering all the tropics on both sides of the equator, and yet still shows the decline. That begs the question of whether the Southern Hemisphere data  has been adjusted too. It would be good to see the raobcore sets further up towards the arctic. It would also be good to look at the Southern Hemisphere. Where are the data sets and peer reviewed papers on temperature from 1965 to 1980? I’d like to follow that up.

Three decades of adjustments

When did the “funny business” begin? By 1980 Hansen and GISS had already produced graphs which were starting to neutralize the decline. His graphs of 1987 and then 2007 further reduced the decline, until the cooling from 1960 to 1975 was completely lost.

Hansen Giss adjust temperatures from 1940-1980(Click to see a larger image).

Watch how the cooling trend of the 1960’s to 1970’s is steadily adjusted up so that 0.3 degrees cooler gradually becomes 0.03 rising (notice the red and blue horizontal lines in the graphs above).

Mathews Graph 1976: 1955 – 1965 was around 0.3C warmer than 1970’s
Hansen/GISS 1980:
1955 – 1965 was around 0.1C warmer than 1970’s

Hansen/GISS 1987: 1955 – 1965 was around 0.05C warmer than 1970’s
Hansen/GISS 2007: 1955 – 1965 was around 0.03C cooler than 1970’s

And in 1974, there was the fore-runner of the “It’s worse than we thought” message.


US NAtional Science Board 1974. Temperatures falling sharply!

Frank has more information and details on his blog Hide the decline.

If 1958 temperatures were similar to the 1990’s, it rewrites the entire claim of all the unprecedented warming of late. Lansner also remind us of the photos taken in the arctic by submarines that surfaced around the north pole.

Submarines surfacing at the north pole



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; climatechangedata; climategate; globalwarminghoax; roswell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 03/18/2010 7:59:03 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Fred Nerks; steelyourfaith; NormsRevenge; onyx; BOBTHENAILER; ...

fyi


2 posted on 03/18/2010 7:59:54 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

There’s lies, damn lies and global warming data!


3 posted on 03/18/2010 8:02:57 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

Ping.


4 posted on 03/18/2010 8:04:26 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Tunehead54; Clive; Fractal Trader; tubebender; marvlus; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

5 posted on 03/18/2010 8:14:50 PM PDT by steelyourfaith (Warmists as "traffic light" apocalyptics: "Greens too yellow to admit they're really Reds."-Monckton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

LOL!


6 posted on 03/18/2010 8:22:32 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
JoNova article linked in this article....FR thread:

Hide the decline and rewrite history? ( Global Warming.....??)

7 posted on 03/18/2010 8:27:05 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

If you might add some of your comments on the thread on this one...I think I follow this a bit better.

Certainly more evidence of the “warmers” working on the data.


8 posted on 03/18/2010 8:31:35 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It is going to get harder and harder for any AGW theorist or otherwise, e.g. political pundit, to shove any further climate control down the throats of the American citizen. Senator Inhofe and his supporters are going to keep track of every "gotcha" and tell Obi and Lisa Jackson to go pound sand.
Senator Boxer by all indications has chosen her particular hole to put her head into at this point.
9 posted on 03/18/2010 8:48:07 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
There is effort to see her removed out here...from her coveted Senatorial job.

KFI's John and Ken Show was hammering on her the other day....she is now trying to represent herself as tough on crime....

10 posted on 03/18/2010 9:03:52 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It looks like an example of the Universal Adjustment Factor being applied to the past.


11 posted on 03/18/2010 10:46:32 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Clicking to enlarge the picture under “Three decades of adjustment,” shows just how blatant the scamming of the data was, It’s damning!
Yes the article is from JONOVA, who I found yesterday. But it later made it to WUWT, which is a great site because of the informed, and scholarly posters who comment there. I think we shall see more and more scientists and scholars falling off the AGW bandwagon, as they realize the data they were counting on to be valid, is proven to be bogus.


12 posted on 03/19/2010 4:58:57 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

13 posted on 03/19/2010 6:01:00 AM PDT by JRios1968 (The real first rule of Fight Club: don't invite Chuck Norris...EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

And it’s got Hansen’s group fingerprints all over it....


14 posted on 03/19/2010 9:36:46 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Found this from a post in the comments at WUWT by a 18 03 2010 Juraj V. (09:57:47) : :

***************************

Central Europe record composed from 2 up to 14 stations, covering eastern half of Slovakia and bits of Poland, Ukraine and Hungary:

80ties are colder than beginning of 20th century. Quite similar to Armagh or CET record.

AND:

Central England air temperatures since 1659


15 posted on 03/19/2010 9:49:50 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Fred Nerks; steelyourfaith; NormsRevenge; onyx; BOBTHENAILER; ...
More updates....ping!

From the comments at WUWT:

****************************************

Compare to above photos....of subs at the North Pole.

16 posted on 03/19/2010 9:58:37 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Last I heard, when McIntyre busted NASA Goddard on their temperature "adjustment" algorithm, the 1930s were the warmest decade on the modern record. So it looks like that graph tracks reasonably well.
17 posted on 03/19/2010 10:03:13 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Another ooops moment?


18 posted on 03/19/2010 10:03:29 AM PDT by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Way bigger than that!


19 posted on 03/19/2010 10:04:20 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Fred Nerks; Carry_Okie; Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Pulled this from the comments....

march 18, 2010...

*****************************EXCERPT*******************

Enneagram

We must remember that there were sent Clima-Gate emails to many countries all over the world, so there was a widespread “cooperation” to “Hide the decline”.
I wrote to my own country “contact”, which appeared as recepient of some emails. the same day climate-gate happened and he didn’t answer me. In every country, as it has been shown here at WUWT weather stations were cherry picked and all those which recorded lower temperatures just disappeared.<

We saw this from the North Australia data....remember Darwin zero....

**************************my comment*****************************

Guess I could find that JoNova article on what they did to show North Australia Heating UP!

20 posted on 03/19/2010 10:08:48 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson