Posted on 12/03/2009 10:59:33 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
Behar: "Let me say this about Tiger on his behalf. He has never held himself up as one of these pro-marriage, right-wing kind of guys who is anti-gay."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.tv ...
This is what the Shrews on The View get to say on ABC-Disney without rebuke from the suits (Disney is led by a publicly gay man now).
Gee, Joy. Not very familiar with the English language, are you.
Did I miss something?
Did Tiger Woods admit to an affair with a MAN or something?
Oh I didn’t know that there were different types of hypocrites, personal and societal. Good to know. sarc/
Behar if anyone is married and cheats they become a hypocrite because the vows mean you don’t boink anyone else but the one you married. Looks like we’ve figured out why Behar has been married more than once?
She basically said....”the left have NO MORALS”!!
Is this a suprise to you? ;)
Didn’t Tiger make a vow or two when he married? Isn’t making a vow and breaking it soon thereafter “hypocritical?” Given the apparent close proximity in time between his vow and and the breaking of the vow, could one not also conclude that the vow was knowingly false when made and therefore fraudulent? If so, should we not conclude that Tiger is dishonest and fraudulent as well as hypocritical?
Wow! So insightful, Ms. Behar. She should have Tiger’s wife Elin on so she can relay the message to her. I’m sure her wise words would cheer Elin up. Joy Behar is a disgusting human being and a very stupid one as well.
Hmmm, if he is not pro marriage, why did he marry?
If you can’t live up to the biggest promise you make in your life, why should we trust anything that he says ever again?
Trust- once you lose it, you don’t get it back.
Some people have moral principles. Since humans flawed, these people (like all people) sometimes fail to live up to their own standards. Therefore, people who have moral principles are ALWAYS immoral hypocrites and deserve our scorn.
On the other hand, some people have no moral standards of any kind. They do whatever the heck they want, and they deserve our praise for being comfortable with their animal nature.
A terrible, terrible worldview.
See, I would have thought that by getting married Tiger made it clear that he was “pro-marriage.” My mistake, I guess.
Who will prevail?
in liberal speak:
We leftists have no standards and therefore, nothing we do can be wrong.
That’s the exact point a liberal thankfully made on her own just like Chrissy Matthews did the other night about Obama being in the Enemy Camp when speaking to the forces he will command. Rather telling!!!!
They WOULD bring politics into it, wouldn’t they?
It takes a real numbskull to somehow turn the Tiger Woods situation into a discussion on political ideology. Since when do marital vows only apply to one ideology? So Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Edwards, and Silda Spitzer (to name a few) have no right to be upset because their husbands are liberal Democrats?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.