Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

French scientists create skin fast from stem cells
Reuters ^ | Dec 1, 2009 | Reporting by Reuters TV; writing by Sophie Taylor, editing by Tim Pearce

Posted on 12/01/2009 5:03:26 AM PST by decimon

PARIS (Reuters) – French scientists have found a way to create human skin rapidly from stem cells, a discovery that could save the lives of many burns victims who are vulnerable to infection and now wait weeks for a skin graft.

The scientists made the breakthrough by creating a patch of human skin on a mouse's back using stem cells -- cells which have the ability to develop into any human cell.

Skin grafts have traditionally been created from cell cultures taken from the patient -- a process that takes three weeks, too long for some patients suffering extensive burns.

The new method using stem cells allows hospitals to order human skin as soon as they take in a burns victim.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science
KEYWORDS: stemcells

1 posted on 12/01/2009 5:03:26 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon
The article does not contain the word "Embryonic" so I assume these are Adult Stem cells. Of course, that fact is minimized by simply using the generic term "stem cells".

I guarantee you that some folks will see this article will say to themselves: "HMMMPFFF! That is precisely the sort of scientific advance that Bush was blocking!"

This is the sort of subtle bias and indoctrination that the media engages in and which most people do not see. Embryonic Stem Cell advances (if they exist) are called "Embryonic Stem Cell advances". While all of the Adult Stem Cell advances are simply credited to "stem cell research".

2 posted on 12/01/2009 5:14:59 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
What seems to be conveniently left out is whether the stem cells are embryonic or adult.

If it is adult, then the press is still using lies and half truths to push a terrible agenda.

If it is embryonic then, my bad.

3 posted on 12/01/2009 5:19:53 AM PST by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

Has to be Adult Stem Cells. Embryonic stem cells are still tumerous and cancerous to other humans unless there is technology that I don’t know about.


4 posted on 12/01/2009 5:26:43 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Well, Reuters is an international news agency, headquartered in the UK, and the story is out of France. Bush didn’t cross my mind in reading this.


5 posted on 12/01/2009 5:28:12 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Embryonic stem cells are still tumerous and cancerous to other humans

So are "adult" stem cells -- just takes them a few more divisions on average.

6 posted on 12/01/2009 6:07:49 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
So are "adult" stem cells -- just takes them a few more divisions on average.

Obviously not like Embryonic ones. After all, there are over 50 treatments with them.

LOLARMAOOTF

7 posted on 12/01/2009 6:10:26 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: decimon

This could be a huge breakthrough, both as a lifesaver and a way to reduce the horrible disfigurement that often accompanies severe burns.

And there could also be another huge advantage: using this against skin cancer. Often skin cancers clusters together on a section of skin, from which they branch out. If someone has a patch of skin like that, it might be possible to just remove the entire area, and replace it with new skin. One big surgery instead of a bunch of small ones that just try to stave off the problem a cancer at a time.


8 posted on 12/01/2009 6:29:07 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
This could be a huge breakthrough, both as a lifesaver and a way to reduce the horrible disfigurement that often accompanies severe burns.

That's what I thought. This could begin as a lifesaving treatment and work its way to other uses.

9 posted on 12/01/2009 6:56:29 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

It has to be ethical stem cells. If they did finally have a treatment from embryonic stem cells (ok, potential treatment) they would be trumpeting it from the rooftops.


10 posted on 12/01/2009 8:35:01 AM PST by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
...does not contain the word "Embryonic" so I assume these are Adult Stem cells. Of course, that fact is minimized by simply using the generic term "stem cells". I guarantee you that some folks will see this article will say to themselves: "HMMMPFFF! That is precisely the sort of scientific advance that Bush was blocking!"
Well said, ClearCase_guy. Thanks decimon for posting it.
11 posted on 12/01/2009 6:40:30 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson