Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An open letter to Washington, D.C. (FReeper help requested)
myself | 11/04/09 | Neil E. Wright

Posted on 11/04/2009 1:24:29 PM PST by Neil E. Wright

An open letter to Washington, D.C.

This letter is published to advise the federal government in Washington D.C. that this SOVEREIGN AMERICAN will NOT submit to the marxist/communist coup currently taking place in Washington, D.C., and will ACTIVELY OPPOSE IT.

This SOVEREIGN AMERICAN will IGNORE any laws, rules or regulations that come from Washington D.C. that further restrict the FREEDOM and LIBERTY of individuals, and will in the future IGNORE any PREVIOUS, UNConstitutional laws, rules or regulations that have restricted the FREEDOM and LIBERTY of individuals in this country.

Further, this SOVEREIGN AMERICAN will encourage others to ignore any laws, rules or regulations that restrict the FREEDOM and LIBERTY of any individual in this country.

Whether the laws relate to "health insurance mandates", gun laws, environmental law or any other "law" that restricts INDIVIDUAL Americans from utilizing their own personal property, or that restricts what we can eat, or how much, what we can drink, what type of toilet we are "required" to have, what we can or cannot say, what we can think, how we must provide "service" to ANYONE, how much we can donate to our favorite charities, who we can associate with, I'm here to tell you to take all your "demands," your "laws, rules and regulations" and print them out, then fold the printout until it is all sharp corners AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR COLLECTIVE ASSES! I WILL NOT COMPLY!

I will stand with the founders of this GREAT Nation and remind you of their words: "When in the course of human events When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. -- That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. ..."


TOPICS: Education; Health/Medicine; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; capandtrade; donttreadonme; freedom; government; liberalfascism; liberty; livefreeordie; lping; oathkeepers; obama; obamacare; selfgovernment; standdown; tyranny
I am requesting FReeper help in listing the previous "laws, rules and regulations" for the last 90 years that have restricted the FREEDOM and LIBERTY of we, The People.

When I have a list, I'll incorporate the list into the letter and publish it for anyone to copy, paste and use.

Toward FREEDOM

1 posted on 11/04/2009 1:24:31 PM PST by Neil E. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; dcwusmc; Jeff Head; A Navy Vet; All

Toward FREEDOM


2 posted on 11/04/2009 1:25:54 PM PST by Neil E. Wright (An OATH is FOREVER (NRA member) 3%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
Rage GGRRR
3 posted on 11/04/2009 1:26:22 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

You forgot to remind them that their so-called President is a Kenyan, not an American. By that, no law he passes has any validity at all.

Are you and your family armed for the coming dark times?


4 posted on 11/04/2009 1:35:08 PM PST by IntolerantOfTreason (The AMERICAN President should be an AMERICAN, NOT an AFRICAN-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

BTTT!!!


5 posted on 11/04/2009 2:11:56 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma (BG x 2 (and a heartbeat was heard today....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

Laws that declare that even if a plant or animal is grown in my state, packed in my state, sold to me in my state by a store that bought it and shipped it in my own state, to be cooked and consumed by me in my state, can be federally regulated by use of the interstate commerce clause.


6 posted on 11/04/2009 2:23:34 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (Ram "Health Care Reform" down our throats in '09, and we'll ram it up your @ss in '10.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
Neil, instead of worrying about "past" laws that are unconstitutional, do this.

Work towards having your state pass one simple law. This law would simply require that documentation provided to Congress by a President elect that shows he meets eligibility requirements as per the Constitution in Article two MUST also be in that state's file. In other words, a "legal" President should have no problem complying with this law. A "usurper" who has snuck through the requirements of section three of the Twentieth amendment due to Congressional oversight or cowardice must STILL prove to the states with this law that they are in fact legit. Otherwise, none of the signed legislation from such a usurper would be accepted as legal in that state. In addition, no actions of such a usurper would carry any legal authority in such a state.

Since such a law at the "state" level would basically be helping to ENFORCE the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, there is no way it could be ruled "unconstitutional". The best part is that such a law could be passed by a state's legislature at any time (Like ASAP) to help protect that state's citizens from the illegal actions of a usurper.

7 posted on 11/04/2009 4:17:57 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson