Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Arrested For Attacking Smoker With Air Freshener
All Headline News ^ | August 28, 2009 | Shannon McGregor

Posted on 08/30/2009 3:22:10 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

Niceville, FL (AHN) - A woman was arrested Aug. 21 for attacking another woman, a smoker, with a can of air freshener.

Police were called to an apartment complex in Niceville, Fla. where they found a woman spraying a 9 ounce can of "Glade Potpourri Air Freshener" around another woman's head, the Northwest Florida Daily News of Fort Walton Beach reported.

Apparently seeking a fresher environment, the woman allegedly pointed the can at the other woman's head, spraying the contents of the can continuously for nearly a minute.

The police report quoted the sprayer saying she'll continue to spray the air freshener and threatened she'd take the case all the way to the Supreme Court, maintaining her right to breathe fresh air, the Daily News reported.

This was the second time the woman had attacked the other woman with air freshener for smoking in front of her apartment.

The woman was arrested for battery. No word on what scent potpourri she found covered the smoke best.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: assault; niceville; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: kdot

You are not allone - any sort of perfume gives me an instant migrane, and more exposure leads to repiratory arrest.


61 posted on 08/30/2009 6:31:54 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mrsixpack36

The anti-smoking laws are a$$ backwards. Smoking should not be illegal on private property as long as the property owner allows it. It should be illegal on PUBLIC property.

The laws are backwards.


62 posted on 08/30/2009 6:33:02 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“Smokers shouldn’t have special laws just for themselves.”

Ok, let us outlaw perfume of any sort everywhere it is illegal to smoke.

Same-same, no?


63 posted on 08/30/2009 6:33:34 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Btw, in the 50’s, the drug stores used to sell “asthmatic cigarettes” to “soothe the lungs”. I suppose in 60 years, people will look back at us and think we were stupid. :-)


64 posted on 08/30/2009 6:34:04 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: patton

Yes, it’s the same.


65 posted on 08/30/2009 6:34:50 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Smokers shouldn’t have special laws just for themselves.

What special laws would those be?

66 posted on 08/30/2009 6:35:10 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

lock her away for life!!!


67 posted on 08/30/2009 6:38:12 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Actually, I support the idea.


68 posted on 08/30/2009 6:39:08 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

I don’t worry about the dangers of cigarette smoke.

I just don’t think laws should favor a person putting on substance in the air over another. I don’t like air freshner either. In fact, I’d rather cigarette smoke than air freshener ... but the principle is what’s important.

Smokers shouldn’t have special laws.


69 posted on 08/30/2009 6:40:03 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

If i was that woman first i woulda punched the offening woman about 4-5 times then maybe claw her,scratch her and kick her.

probaly woulda kept the cops out of it.


70 posted on 08/30/2009 6:40:42 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
"If you outlaw Glade Potpurri only outlaws..."

...will have Aqua Net!

71 posted on 08/30/2009 6:41:06 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

The anti-smoking laws are a$$ backwards. Smoking should NOT be illegal on private property as long as the property owner allows it. It should be illegal on PUBLIC property.

The laws are backwards.


72 posted on 08/30/2009 6:41:09 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Not that I disagree with you, but name me ONE law that isn’t backwards and doesn’t step on our Constitutional/God-Given Rights in some way, shape or form.

It’s insanity! You CANNOT legislate morality or intelligence. That’s pretty d@mn obvious, LOL!


73 posted on 08/30/2009 6:43:18 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
A woman can be fat as can be,
Kisses sweet as honey
But that don't mean a thing to me
If she ain't got no money
If the purse is fat....that's where it's at.

74 posted on 08/30/2009 6:44:04 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

And sic the Pit Bull on her for good measure. ;)


75 posted on 08/30/2009 6:44:40 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Well, as I told a poster upthread.
Smokers are the last safe target for hatred and bigotry.
It has little to nothing to do with the health of the general population. It has everything to do with control.

If anyone wants proof...

Try walking into a mall with an unlit cigarette.


76 posted on 08/30/2009 6:46:13 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

“If the purse is fat....that’s where it’s at.”

My plan is to be very rich and very fat one day. Be nice to me. There might be something in it for you in the long run. *WINK*


77 posted on 08/30/2009 6:46:22 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

That’s a date! My D-I-V-O-R-C-E is going through as we speak. I’m willing to wait, though I do object to the stench of chickens.


78 posted on 08/30/2009 6:48:52 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Hang with me, and you’ll put on lots of pounds after having some of my cooking.


79 posted on 08/30/2009 6:49:05 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

That is why I support the idea - once it is established that perfume is actually more hazardous than 2nd hand smoke, perfume must therefore be more regulated than smoking.

Hence, no perfume anywhere there is no smoking.

Fines, arrest, 1-800 - rat out -granny...

Soon, people might actually notice how overbearing the government has become.


80 posted on 08/30/2009 6:49:36 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson