We should start calling them ObamaBorgs instead of trolls.
Posted on 06/27/2009 7:33:26 AM PDT by a real Sheila
Vanity thread- Just wanted to see if anyone has noticed a sudden influx of new trolls on FR over the past few days. I logged on this morning to find 2 very hateful emails about some comments I made back BEFORE the election, calling me RACIST (how they love to use that word), and accusing me of hate speech and ordering me to burn in hell for my comments and beliefs.
I cannot recall this person's screen name, but he CLAIMED to be a professional white male who is "normally" conservative. (yeah right).
I couldn't even get angry and was even "mildly amused" and filled with slight pity for this useful idiot Obamatron who has been "assimilated" and is simply now spreading the "gospel of Obama."
Oh, this person has been a member of FR since YESTERDAY! That says it all.
You should have posted the text (sans troll names) so we could have a laugh.
You should wear this attack as a badge of honor.
We should start calling them ObamaBorgs instead of trolls.
Expect many more to enlist over the next few months as Obama-worship continues and liberals see the need to “monitor” right-wing hate sites like FR.
There is a disturbing convergence among liberals that conservatives are dangerous and something must be done about it.
The trolls that come out into the open are fine....it is the ones who try to blend in and act as agent provacateurs who are dangerous.
And ACORN will have enough PAID trolls to shut us down, if JimRob does not wise up and start accepting financing from some serious sources.
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO SELL OUT to accept funding!!!
Going begging every quarter is pathetic, when soros and his ilk are funding moveon.org wih MILLIONS
It was early and I deleted the messages without even thinking of the humor I could share here.
I have no doubt the a-hole will email me again.
The problem with that is that whoever does the funding also determines the content.
go back to your ‘pings’ and get his/her name.
You hear on the conservative talk shows a marked increase in 'liberal' callers of the people-of-color persuasion - they are doing this for nothing.
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is NOT TRUE
If he wants to maintain control, he just has to accept funding with the strict rule that he still runs the show.
you DO NOT Have to ‘sell out’ if you dont want to.
“liberals see the need to “monitor” right-wing hate sites like FR.”
Why are you calling FR a hate site?
EXACTLY!
I laughed out loud when this person claimed to be a conservative. I envisioned a “furry female” from Berkley hammering out that diatribe that awaited my viewing pleasure.
The ObamaBorg’s main gripe was a statement that I made, “Lock and load, people!”
“IT” said that RACIST folks like me are the reason that ‘it’ supports gun-control!
Wonder why they are suddenly on the offensive?
Their guy won and is CLEARLY unopposed in Congress with his Communist agenda.
Because that is how liberals view us....or haven't you noticed?
I’m surprised I haven’t gotten any with my hateful screen name.
Are you suggesting that FR does not allow some people/groups to donate? I find that hard to believe.
Perhaps you are talking about selling a controlling interest?
The American Mullahs I think, is more appropriate.
I’ve noticed a spate of post-election newbies signed up who post links endlessly to their own website and rarely engage in dialog on the threads they initiate (or elsewhere, for that matter)....and that despite the “conservative” appearance of their article snip posted, the whole of it is often liberal in nature, subtly and sometimes approaching subliminal......all of this kind of stuff is subverting this site and others.....and the “license” is “freedom of speech”, which is really only applicable to USG, not anywhere anyone chooses to attempt to invoke it.
You might want to use the term so-called “hate site.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.