Skip to comments.
Too Fat for the Boy Scouts? New Weight Requirement Angers Some
abcnews ^
| May 6, 2009
| By SARAH NETTER
Posted on 05/06/2009 1:59:51 PM PDT by JoeProBono
Larry Armstrong has been volunteering with his local Boy Scout branch for years, chaperoning trips, serving on the council committee, even becoming certified in archery instruction for a day camp. But Armstrong, at 6-foot, 2-inches tall and about 370 pounds, may no longer qualify for some scout outings because he's overweight, part of a new push by the national organization to ensure the scouts and their volunteers are healthy. A new mandatory weight requirement by the national Boy Scouts of America that will take effect next January has some longtime volunteers concerned they will be left out of trips they've enjoyed with their sons for years.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bmi; boyscouts; bsa; bsusa; fat; fitness; morbidobesity; obesity; parentalrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last

Larry Armstrong's weight will exclude him from "high adventure" scouting trips with his sons when the Boy Scouts of America imposes new height/weight requirements next year. (Courtesy Larry Armstrong)
To: JoeProBono
not sure about this one. i’ll reserve judgment until i see some posts.
2
posted on
05/06/2009 2:00:56 PM PDT
by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: JoeProBono
You can openly discriminate against the obese.
3
posted on
05/06/2009 2:01:24 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
To: JoeProBono
New Zealand won’t even let the obese immigrate.
4
posted on
05/06/2009 2:01:41 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
To: JoeProBono
Maybe he should lose some weight?
5
posted on
05/06/2009 2:01:50 PM PDT
by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: JoeProBono
Just another way for the libs and nanny state to close down a great organization.
They and the lawyers first went after cigarettes, then they went after food as bad for your health.
6
posted on
05/06/2009 2:03:06 PM PDT
by
KeyLargo
To: JoeProBono
Armstrong's weight must come down to a minimum of 239 pounds before he'll be allowed on certain "high adventure" trips that take him more than 30 minutes away from emergency care by ground transportation. It sounds like something designed to minimize litigation. Or perhaps it's just PC>
7
posted on
05/06/2009 2:03:40 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
(I am the pink flamingo on the great lawn of life.)
To: JoeProBono
Put your right hand on the edge of the table.... Good
Now put your left hand up there... Good
Now Push Larry!
Push HARD!!!!
Great, you moved your chair back.
Now stand up and walk away. And don’t come back to the table or fridge or anyhting food related until tommorrow.
We are all pulling for you!
To: JoeProBono
Somebody count all the scouts.
Looks like ol’ Larry ate one.
To: JoeProBono
I was 15 lbs below the limit.
Lose some weight, dude.
10
posted on
05/06/2009 2:04:48 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Brett66
Regardless of the politics, he does need to lose some weight.
That’s just not healthy. Even at 100# less he would be pretty chubby.
To: FourPeas
High adventure is tough! These are deep wilderness hikes and canoe trips with packed geer and camping for usually about 7 nights.
I wouldn’t want this guy along huffing and puffing. Who’s gonna deal with his carcass if he keels over in the outback?
To: Brett66
if he wanted to see his kids grow up, he would be trying to get in shape.
like the old saying: become the man you want your son to be.
not sure larry wants his son to look like that in 30 years.
13
posted on
05/06/2009 2:06:47 PM PDT
by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: JoeProBono
He ain’t heavy, he’s my brother.
To: JoeProBono
That will cause some parents to take their kids out of scouting and/or not allow them to go on the specific trips or activities the parents aren’t allowed to attend.
15
posted on
05/06/2009 2:10:40 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
To: JoeProBono
In this case, it may not be such a bad idea. I used to be a Scout. When you get ten miles into a wilderness hike, and a guy that size has a myocardial infarction going up the side of a ridge, you have an 'issue'. He's not being summarily booted from every activity, he's being told to make sure he can hack the physical stress. So what's the alternative if he's left to go, even accepting the personal risk? Do you leave him at the bottom of the hill, sucking air? Salvage the hike by making him into a merit badge project? I mean, WTF. Once in a while, a conditional 'no' just makes sense. I wanted to be a pilot in the Air Force. They said I was color blind, so I went in the Army. A man's gotta know his limitations, and adapt to them.

16
posted on
05/06/2009 2:11:10 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
(This tagline for rent.)
To: a fool in paradise
Any adult who eagerly wishes to participate in that stuff is a wierdo.
17
posted on
05/06/2009 2:11:20 PM PDT
by
exist
To: JoeProBono
OH COME ON NOW, they are just going to re-create him in their own image before they let him learn honesty, responsibility and develop desirable character traits. /sarcasm
To: Revolting cat!
19
posted on
05/06/2009 2:12:31 PM PDT
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: Revolting cat!
20
posted on
05/06/2009 2:13:00 PM PDT
by
Hacksaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson