Posted on 02/26/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by jackofhearts
I have it on impeccable authority but cannot disclose my source within the Fox Network. Rest assured that Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdock are sitting on the Obama eligibility/birth certficate story. Everyone else wants to jump all over it, including Sean Hannity.
I say storm the Ailes/Murdock fax machine/email servers--let them know (politely) we need this issue thoroughly.
Maybe someone has the email/fax numbers?
You said — “Instead of dealing with the corruption, you want to paste a new law on top of the old. You may be the deranged one, after all.”
In case you haven’t noticed — it’s *laws* that deal with corruption. When we saw the corruption with Obama’s Senate seat, it’s “laws” that pertain to the corruption for which someone is going to be “prosecuted”. Whenever we talk about corruption anywhere — it’s always a “law” that was broken and a “law” that pertains to a criminal case being prosecuted against the person (or persons) involved.
It’s *precisely* the *law* that counts. And that’s why the “law” is needed for the vetting process — to get rid of any of the “corruption” of this failed vetting process that we saw “in action” this last election...
If getting a *law* passed is so important to you, then you must favor Fox news reporting about Obama’s birth certificate fraud and senate and executive branch corruption so you can get people to support you.
This is something *you* can do, contact Fox news and show that Americans want to know about the fraud so they can act on it.
We’ll be interested to see what you say to Fox news.
Here is a link. Cunningham’s show is syndicated on WLS at 9:00 pm Central time on Sunday evenings. The issue of Hussein’s NBC status is discussed almost every week. He has had Berg and Corsi on his show several times.
Well, you may not know it, but right here in Oklahoma, there is a Broken Arrow legislator who has put through a bill for that purpose. It has already passed out of committee and I have to check on what the next steps are. I’m already involved in the process right here and right now.
It’s a “state-by-state” involvement with your own legislators from your own state. Arizona is doing it, too — but, I’m not in Arizona. I am in Oklahoma and I am involved in that. So, I’m “in the process” right now...
—
There’s a good chance of its passage, because of how conservative the Oklahoma people are. Oklahoma had every single county in the state go for the Republican ticket. And in addition to that, the two major metropolitan areas in the state (typically, in the country, metro areas go Democrat...) went for the Republican ticket. Oklahoma had the highest percentage of vote for the Republican ticket of any of the states.
Also, Oklahoma passed the toughest immigration law in the United States, a year or so ago. And from that, it seems that all the illegals just picked up and moved out of state... LOL...
But, I can’t predict — for sure — how the bill is going to fare. One can only work on it and see how it goes. But, I’m “there” already...
—
Now, having said that — I would not suggest Fox News, but I would suggest contacting your state legislator (or legislators) and getting something like that going in your own state — and also for anyone else who is reading this — for their own state. This is the thing to do... And, along with that, if you’re concerned about “support” (which I’m not in the state of Oklahoma...), you can organize through the FReepers on the state board, you have. That’s a good resource for organizing locally.
And, by the way, the bill has been reported in the news, several times, for the local people, here in the state. It’s a bill that pertains to all candidates and not just to the President. So, it doesn’t just single out one office. It’s sort of in conjunction with the “illegals” legislation that went through, since people here don’t want illegals in the state. They don’t want someone who is not legitimate, either, to be in office.
The general public still needs to know about it somehow. How do you condone suppression of such vital information for a voter and citizen?
Nothing is suppressed as far as I can see. I can go to several websites and get listings of all the information that I could ever want on the subject... LOL.. Not only that, we’ve got all the articles that someone could want, right here on Free Republic.
I don’t watch Fox, or NBC, or ABC, or CBS. I don’t read “hard copy” of newspapers — but — I do access all the news I want through various online news sites. The local paper, for example, is here in full PDF format, if I want to read through it page-by-page, or I can use the online site.
If I were interested in getting info from any of the MSM TV news sites, I could do so through their own websites.
As far as “political organization” is concerned, the “grass roots” model is the best and one can organize that through the state boards. And if a person is involved politically, already, they will have the local connections. It’s not a national effort that is going on here, but a state effort. And even if it were a national effort, politics is a local affair, anyway. What is “national” has to be done locally. It’s the “combination” of the “local” that makes for a “national” effort.
And as far as the media is concerned, and since one has to work with local legislators and one has to create “impact” (for those legislators) from the “locals” — the media contacts are going to be local contacts. One can organize letter writing campaigns with local papers throughout the state to get attention on the subject. One can do online comments on the various local news sites to get the information in front of those who are reading those various news sites. I worked with a lady in another state, one time, where she cultivated news media contacts, locally, so that she could quickly “gain the ear” of certain reporters and get responses to certain types of political news that went out on the local media.
I mean — with all the “politically motivated” people around here — I don’t think I have to tell them how to do it. I’m sure they already know how to organize locally and get in touch with their local legislators and contact their local media.
On election night he was sucking up to Obama way too much for my taste. I thought it was extremely uncharacteristic. Since then, I think he’s come around a bit but he is just a part-timer now.
Interesting. Didn’t know that. I’m not sure Republicans would make a big deal about it in court anyway.
Just saw this on FreeRepublic:
“I have it on impeccable authority but cannot disclose my source within the Fox Network. Rest assured that Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdock are sitting on the Obama eligibility/birth certficate story. Everyone else wants to jump all over it, including Sean Hannity. I say storm the Ailes/Murdock fax machine/email servers--let them know (politely) we need this issue thoroughly. Maybe someone has the email/fax numbers?”
If this is true, then you belie those of us who actually have trusted you when you promote, with seeming sincerity, the above captioned “We Report, You Decide” as your operating philosophy. It seems that when a former Presidential candidate, current and former members of the military risk their names and fortunes to pursue the truth, or lack thereof, of the suggestion that this man Obama may be ineligible to serve the office he holds, that is news and should be discussed. If the allegation is myth, then so be it. The promoters will be humiliated and disgraced, as they should be. If it is true, then it will be the largest election fraud in the history of the country – it will make LBJ’s win look like stealing the high-school class presidency.
If you can’t bear to pursue the eligibility issue qua eligibility issue, then pursue it from the angle of simple logic and economics. Why would Obama and his Socialist-ideological flock spend the vast sums of money that they have heretofore to fight revealing Obama's personal records which other candidates before Obama have revealed when a few letters and a couple of bucks could disprove once and for all the matter at hand (hidden hand as far as the press is concerned)?
You are either a honest professional or you are not. Please respond or change your motto to the more lengthy but fitting “We Decide, We Report, Viewer/Readers Be Quiet”
Thanks for the explanation. I don’t have TV so I don’t know these things. FR and a couple of other sites are my sole news sources. I can read faster than than they can say stuff on TV, no ads, and I never have to hear 0bama or see a moving picture of him.
Has everyone forgotten Shepard Smith standing in front of the wreckage of the world trade center on September 11 telling the American people that they’ve decided not to show us all and tell us all the events they were capturing because ‘we couldn’t take it’?
Fox new tells you what you need to know to be a complaint slave to the globalist economy. That’s all. Your taxes and your children’s futures are needed to pay for globalism, so you are not to know the truth about certain things.
You said — “Nobody probably will read this but here is what I sent to Newscorp.”
Ummmm..., the guy was banned because of this fake news story... You can see why some of these “news agencies” will take these kinds of “complaining e-mails” with a “grain of salt” — especially so, when they’re generated by someone who posts a fake story (like this one here...)...
That’s the trouble with “boards” and the “internet” — to much fake stuff going on out there. You know the old saying — “No one knows you’re a dog on the Internet.” (from the cartoon in New Yorker Magazine... LOL...).
You said — “You need glasses!”
Yes, I do need glasses, after reading so much of the *fake stuff* on the Internet.
You can’t suppress stuff on the Internet. That’s not the problem that people have. The *real problem* is that one has to sort through *so much fake stuff* — before they can ever find and/or ascertain the “real stuff”.
So, no..., suppression is not the trouble. It’s the tsunami of fake stories and false information and total and outright disinformation, and crazy stuff and deranged stuff, and the stuff that comes out of insane asylums... LOL...
You said — “Yes, news is suppressed. It suppresion harms American freedom. The fake stories? When Fox news runs advertisements for their entertainment arm, masquerading it as ‘news’ stories. Fox new disinformation? How about their phony ‘fair and balanced’ for starters. They will go the way of the New York times, if they keep it up. But not until they do grave harm to the American people.”
Well, we can start — right off the bat — and say that the fact that you’re posting here, shows that nothing is suppressed. If it were, then you wouldn’t be able to say what you have been saying. Heck! You can get your own “free website” and post all sorts of ridiculous garbage, if you want to and no one is going to suppress it or stop you. You can get your own website, even at home, on your own computers with your own connections and do as much of that as you want. You can even put up websites in other countries, where the laws here won’t touch it (if that’s what you want...).
Furthermore, when I see that Phil Berg can post a website and tell about his court cases and file a case against Bush for being involved in the 9/11 attack — that tells me that things are not being suppressed. If it were, I wouldn’t even hear about that.
Come to think of it, I think that there are still FReepers who don’t know that Phil Berg is also suing Bush for being involved in the 9/11 attack, besides suing Obama for his documentation... LOL...
And as far as “fake stories” — well, there *are people* who think the “fake stories” are true, because *they* believe them... :-) (but the “saner” among us know better....).
There is sure no shortage of “those” on the Internet, and hence, it is the proof that nothing is suppressed, or else, someone would have put all those people in the asylum by now...
So, I come back to the point that there is not suppression, because there’s no way to suppress stuff. There are too many ways to “get it out”. The *real problem* is that there is so much “garbage” out there, that no one wants to “wade through the muck” to find the real stuff. Therefore, the *real problem* is not “suppression* but all the maniacal stuff that is “out there” — which is making it difficult to see anything else. It’s the *total lack of suppression* that is the problem...
—
I have to come back to “Free Republic” as an example, once again. If you think things are being suppressed, then how come a news article — or even a mere “vanity” can be posted here (or actually, anywhere else, if you want to “put it up”) — and tomorrow, millions of people can sit at home and read about it? That sure doesn’t sound like suppression to me.
This is not a ‘news’ site. Newspapers, news websites news tv spike articles. People generally get news from tv, then radio then print. Not everyone is capable or has time as apparently you are paid to, to surf the internet looking for stories about Obama’s birth records.
They spiked stories about Clinton all the time. They also start broadcasting stuff, like shep smith did at 9/11 and then decide ‘americans couldn’t take it’ and stop or change the stories. I have hear stories change almost minute by minute until they massage the news to their liking.
I’m sure you’ve seen it a million times, but how often does the race or immigration status of a murderer or criminal get sponged from a story? You’re full of baloney if you say information like that is readily available anywhere.
I’ve never heard a free person argue that ‘total lack of suppression’ is a problem with speech. You are sounding like a paid blog monitor for a totalitarian. Your credibility is ZERO, like your boss.
I hope you're paying attention because this is exactly the kind of messaging tactic that our side needs to be more aggressive at. I don't see the Democrats waiting to have proof that will stand up in court before hurling their accusations into the ether. I don't understand why we advocate having all our I's dotted and T's crossed before challenging Democrats.
Setting aside the issue of publicizing Obama's constitutional qualification, our side should also be loudly aiming accusations at Chris Dodd and Barney Frank for the financial mess; we should be going after MSNBC and ABC news correspondents for their laziness in covering these stories; we should be pointing out the failures of major newspapers because they were too biased in reporting the news.
It doesn't matter if these targets complain about being attacked, or that the attacks are just diversions (which they are), or that the attacks are unfounded (which they are not). The point is that while they are reacting, they are also doing several other things: 1) they are dragging themselves into the gutter with the people they hoped to lead into the gutter, 2) they are further exposing the stories that we want exposed by keeping the story alive, 3) they are not reporting on other things while they report on this, 4) they look just as mean-spirited as they are trying to portray others. If they fail to respond for fear of the above, then the accusations stand unchallenged.
That's how it is in today's court of public opinion.
-PJ
“...and his grandmother who died suddenly during the last days of the campaign...told neighbors that her daughter’s baby was born in Africa.”
Pls, where’d ya get this info?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.