Posted on 02/26/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by jackofhearts
I have it on impeccable authority but cannot disclose my source within the Fox Network. Rest assured that Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdock are sitting on the Obama eligibility/birth certficate story. Everyone else wants to jump all over it, including Sean Hannity.
I say storm the Ailes/Murdock fax machine/email servers--let them know (politely) we need this issue thoroughly.
Maybe someone has the email/fax numbers?
It is amazing that this poster, after being exposed as a fraud trying to use a bible story to leverage an issue, has the gaul to claim she can gain creds at FR because she doesn’t ruyn from bible issues! Bwahahahahaha ... and she will never comprehend the irony of her deceits. LOL
I even had to put out a general BOLO in one of the recent ZOT-reports!
It’s amazing that certain Obama Derangement Syndrome types are working so hard on me... my, my....
“Well, isn’t that special?”
[ ... compliments The Church Lady ... ]
Everyone got caught flat-footed, the secretaries of state, the courts, the electoral college and the congress. No one would stand up on their hind legs and ask for the proof of qualifications.
I believe it is a fact that he has not shown to anyone he is qualified. The proof is in his records and he is refusing to open up the records. He has control over the proof and refuses to present it. This is guily behavior.
I thnk mine is a normal interpretation based upon the guy's behavior, failure to show the evidence, and outright fighting those who call for the evidence.
No need to be deranged or believe in conspircaies when what I have cited are facts.
What's disturbing to me is that you think there is are conspiracists, when you should be joining in the outcry for the truth to be published.
As long as people let him go unchallenged, he can operate under fraud allegations now and throughout history.
BRAVO!!! CTHULHU F’HTAGN!!!
guilty behavior
you sound like “Baghdad Bob” [we’re actually winning...]
___________
and you sound like someone that was given talking points and told to show up on bc threads on the internet......
Folloed?
Typo alert!
Check your keyboards!
FolloWed....
Disruptors use the term “Obama Derangement Syndrome” as though the unfounded rabid hatred leftists had for Bush is equivalent to the rational disgust and loathing conservatives hold towards the thug marxist 0bama.
The leftists hated Bush because he wasn’t a rabid leftist; conservatives loathe 0bama because he *is* a rabid leftist.
Additionally, this emphasis on “wait until 2010 and 2012 and win some elections although of course you - ahema - we - lost this one, so maybe you - ahem, - we - will lose again since conservative principles aren’t popular” means one thing:
“Wait until 0bama’s plans, programs, amnesty, ACORN, leftist judges and so on are all firmly entrenched and then Republicans will NEVER win! Do nothing - especially about the birth cert issue (insert derogatory term).”
See my comment above....
And Brit Hume kowtowed to 0bama? Say it ain’t so! He was the only person on TV I could stand (don’t have a TV but when I did see him occasionally he seemed a good one.)
Sports drinks and energy bars for the Viking Kitties....
LMAO!!!
That’s funny right there!!!
You said — “You can state anything you want here as cover as in I qoute scripture or I vote Republican. I don’t know if you do or not. But what I do know is that you have a common theme in your posts as I pointed out to you in number 187. It’s indicative of your posts in general.”
This is the example of the “conspiracy theory” as I’ve stated it up above. It states that the courts are “in on it” if they don’t act in a manner that removes Obama from office.
Or, it’s clear that someone who posts against the Obama Derangement Syndrome types is “obviously” part of a conspiracy — like “you’re getting paid to do this” or “you’re a liberal” or “you’re a troll” or “you support Obama” — all of which indicates a “conspiracy” right here on Free Republic.
It seems to escape the *very basic understanding* that one can be a conservative and not believe in conspiracy theories or not believe in the Obama Derangement Syndrome.
—
And lastly you said — “There’s no such thing as “Obama Derangement Syndrome” as it pertains his citizenship issue. It’s well established that Obama has covered up his past that could plausibly put “his presidency” in jeopardy.”
Well, there is since it’s been “coined” by other conservatives (as a “phrase”). What this is — is the thinking that the courts can “do something” about getting Obama out of office, on the basis of Internet allegations and speculations — without *any proof* in a court of law. And it further “extends” to the area where people of this persuasion *also* think that one day the U.S. Military will send tanks to the White House to remove Obama from office. Or, another variation on this “syndrome” is that a “single judge” (somewhere in the U.S.) will issue a court order to a U.S. Marshal to escort Obama out of the White House, having declared the Office of President of the United States “vacant” because of “fraud”. All of this is what is classified as “Obama Derangement Syndrome”.
Now, to “get into the real world” — is to do something like this legislator from Broken Arrow, Oklahoma is doing, in putting through a bill to properly vet candidates for office by requiring specific documentation. Now, that is *not* part of Obama Derangement Syndrome, because that’s a “real world” and “working” solution to the problem of getting Obama out of office.
The “conspiracy phase” of the Obama Derangement Syndrome comes about when the judges don’t do what they “are supposed to do” (according to these people) and therefore that means they are “in cahoots” with Obama and are protecting him as part of that “conspiracy”.
And, of course, by these same people — I am part of this wide-ranging conspiracy, because I post like this... LOL...
You said — “and you sound like someone that was given talking points and told to show up on bc threads on the internet......”
Ummm..., more “conspiracy” as I’ve indicated is “rampant” with the Obama Derangement Syndrome — going “hand-in-hand” with it...
Don’t you every get tired of trying to make me a part of a grand conspiracy to support Obama... LOL...
Oh..., never mind that I campaigned against him. And it doesn’t count that I’m a Republican and I refuse to vote for a Democrat (I think Obama is a Democrat, right?) And it doesn’t matter that I also asked for documentation to be shown to vet the candidate prior to the election, but I lost (along with other conservatives).
All that doesn’t matter, because whoever is not part of the Obama Derangement Syndrome is part of this vast conspiracy “against us”... :-)
It’s nice that you keep trying to make claims to credibility, but it’s just so difficult to believe a fraud like you’ve been exposed to be. Can you forgive us?
Thanks for the ping. Note my comment above (a few above by now probably). Same topic, sort of.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.