Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Backyard Skywatchers Find Tool Bag Lost in Space
Space ^ | 25 Nov 2008 | Jeanna Bryner

Posted on 11/28/2008 8:15:24 AM PST by BGHater

Amateur astronomers have been monitoring a shiny tool bag that has been orbiting Earth ever since it was dropped last week by an astronaut during a spacewalk outside the International Space Station.

The bag is reportedly about magnitude 6.4, which under most sky conditions is too faint to see with the naked eye.

Veteran spacewalker and Endeavor astronaut Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper lost her grip on the backpack-sized bag on Nov. 18 while cleaning up a mess from a leaking grease gun she was carrying to help mop up metal grit from inside a massive gear that turns the space station's starboard solar wings.

The tool bag cost $100,000 and its loss meant astronauts had to share the remaining tool bag for subsequent spacewalks. The tool bag weighs about 30 pounds (14 kg) and is 20 inches (51 cm) wide, about a foot (30 cm) tall and a hand's-width deep, according to John Ray, STS-126 lead spacewalk officer for the flight. The bag contained two grease guns, a scraper tool, a large trash bag and a small debris bag.

Once the tool bag floated away, some thought they'd seen the end of it. Not quite. A satellite tracker at Spaceweather.com now is monitoring both the space station and the tool bag.

After sunset on Nov. 22, Edward Light, using 10 x 50 binoculars, spotted the bag in space while he scanned the sky from his backyard in Lakewood, N.J., Spaceweather.com reported. On the same night, Keven Fetter of Brockville, Ontario, video-recorded the bag as it passed by the star Eta Pisces in the constellation Pisces.

More bag-viewing opportunities are expected.

The tool bag can be seen through binoculars, a few minutes ahead of the space station's orbit. The satellite tracker predicts that the bag will be visible through binoculars from Europe and western North America during a series of passes this week. By late next week, the tool bag should appear in the evening skies over most of North America.

Like other space debris, the tool bag's show will have a fiery end. "We currently predict that the errant tool bag will fall back to Earth in June of next year," said Nicholas Johnson, chief scientist for orbital debris at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston. "The date is dependent upon solar activity, so an earlier or later date is possible. As the reentry date draws nearer, a more accurate prediction can be made."

And he expects the entire tool bag will burn up upon reentry. "Although we have not yet conducted a detailed reentry survivability analysis for the tool bag and its contents, it is highly likely that no components will reach the surface of the Earth," Johnson told SPACE.com.

The tool bag is not the only piece of space trash from the station. Other junk includes an unmanned Russian cargo ship and a massive ammonia coolant tank the size of a refrigerator. The coolant tank was intentionally tossed from the space station in 2007, and it burned up in Earth's atmosphere earlier this month. The cargo ship undocked on Nov. 14, but will loiter in orbit for engineering tests before its planned disposal in Earth's atmosphere in early December.

An extravehicular activity (EVA) tool bag drifts away from the International Space Station during the mission's first scheduled spacewalk for STS-126.


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; nasa; space; toolbag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: MosesKnows

“What force would cause the tool bag to float away?”

I don’t understand that either. Why doesn’t that force push the tool bag towards the astronaut? Or go straight up or straight down? Why don’t they have a leash on everything? Was this really an accident? Why doesn’t it stay in orbit? Shouldn’t it take off into infinity? If the tool bag falls to Earth why doesn’t the space station, too? Was the tool bag looking for Joe the Plumber?


21 posted on 11/28/2008 8:41:28 AM PST by A knight without armor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mylife

But wait, there’s more...


22 posted on 11/28/2008 8:42:10 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (It's no longer the Press Van, it's a "Tanker" Truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
A video of the incident on Youtube.

There's no point in attempting to retreive the bag, as any effort would cost much more than the bag itself.
23 posted on 11/28/2008 8:46:05 AM PST by Boxen (There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

Thats right! order now and I will include a bottle of “mighty mendit”.
Perfect for repairing those pesky solar arrays...


24 posted on 11/28/2008 8:46:08 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

Your link is lost in space


25 posted on 11/28/2008 8:47:54 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

Opps there it is!
I clicked on the hypertext for “youtube”


26 posted on 11/28/2008 8:48:57 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: norraad
the last time seals failed we lost a Shuttle (Discovery, was it, so long ago, my memory's fadin').

Challenger.

27 posted on 11/28/2008 8:50:25 AM PST by krb (Obama is a miserable failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A knight without armor
Newton's First Law is likely behind the "float." Either her hand imparted motion on the bag or, as it was traveling with her and thus matched her motion, she lost her grip and as she manoeuvered to regrasp it, she changed her vector relative to the bag, thus the "float."

In low erf orbit, the erf exhibits the greatest gravitational pull so as long as she didn't chuck the bag at escape velocity, its orbit will decay until it encounters sufficient atmospheric contact to burn it up.

28 posted on 11/28/2008 8:51:39 AM PST by NonValueAdded (once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

What a great field service job.
Why cant I get a gig like that?


29 posted on 11/28/2008 8:51:49 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A knight without armor

The space station will also fall if the orbit is not maintained by an occasional push form a rocket. Remember Skylab?

The higher objects such as the communication satellites will stay in orbit damn near forever - they are about 26,000 miles above the Earth. The space station is between 200 and three hundred miles.


30 posted on 11/28/2008 8:52:05 AM PST by Pelagius of Asturias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

well is the canadian arm on board the could get close to it and grab it if the could link up with hubble and fix that im sure the could scope up a little bag or is 100 grand just not worth the effort


31 posted on 11/28/2008 8:54:05 AM PST by al baby (Hi mom Honkeys for Mc Cain Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: norraad

RE: astronaut Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper.

Hyphenated-name, female astronauts and toolbags shouldn’t be brought together in the same solar system, maybe?


32 posted on 11/28/2008 9:05:23 AM PST by flowerplough (Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. -O, Jan '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: al baby
well is the canadian arm on board the could get close to it and grab it if the could link up with hubble and fix that im sure the could scope up a little bag or is 100 grand just not worth the effort

They'd have to chase it down with a shuttle, either with a new launch or somehow before re-entry. I'm guessing it's not feasible from their current position before re-entry, and either way the cost of retrieval would probably grossly exceed the value of getting the bag back.

33 posted on 11/28/2008 9:10:04 AM PST by xjcsa (And these three remain: change, hope and government. But the greatest of these is government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: al baby

You asked — “Why could they not retrieve it”

Welllll..., you could end up tracking and watching — an astronaut *and* a tool bag — in space... LOL...


34 posted on 11/28/2008 9:15:17 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

You said — “This statement puzzles me. What force would cause the tool bag to float away?”

No force... just “inertia” — a moving object keeps moving and a stationary object stays stationary (unless acted upon by a force).

Soooo..., unless you place it *precisely* still (it’s never “still”, but at least “still” in relation to your own movement) — it will keep on moving, ever-so-slowly — until it’s out of reach, by the next time you look at it.

ALSO, all you have to do is “bump” it (and not know you just did that) and, once again, it would “ever-so-slowly” float away, out of normal reach...

It’s really *so, so, so* easy for things to float away that the *real problem* is how to keep things *from floating away*....


35 posted on 11/28/2008 9:19:00 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
There's the tool kit!

Surely you can see it!

I see it but don't call me Shirley!

36 posted on 11/28/2008 9:19:39 AM PST by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Throw in a Shamwow! and a pair of Tweezies and you’ve got yourself a deal!


37 posted on 11/28/2008 9:20:41 AM PST by Evie Munchkin (Sarah in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pelagius of Asturias

You said — “Uh, er, umm, duh, things cannot be dropped in space.”

Ummm..., yes you can... LOL...

An “orbit” is to “continuously fall towards earth” — which can be considered “dropping” towards earth, continuously... That is precisely what an “orbit” is...


38 posted on 11/28/2008 9:21:08 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
and it wasn't leashed/tethered to her because?????????
39 posted on 11/28/2008 9:21:56 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evie Munchkin

Sold!


40 posted on 11/28/2008 9:25:30 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson