Former adult star working at local school (Former female porn star, that is)

6ABC Action News ^ | November 21, 2008 | Chad Pradelli

[Stoat]

VINELAND, N.J. - November 21, 2008 - (WPVI) -- She was an adult film star who went by the name Crystal Gunns. But she reportedly says that's part of her past.

She now an aid at D'Ippolito Elementary in Vineland, New Jersey, and that has some parents furious.

"I understand it's her personal life, but I don't feel someone with that background should be working with young children at all," said preschool teacher Maria Martin.

Crystal Gunns is apparently retired. She's now Louisa Tuck, a cafeteria and playground aide at D'Ippolito Elementary.

 

District officials were tipped off about the situation a few weeks back.

They were stunned.

A background check turned up nothing. They wanted to take action, but lawyers advised them not to. Tuck hadn't done anything illegal.

Some parents agree.

"It's in her past. We all do things in our past. And as long as she's not interfering with any kids, I don't see any problem with it," said Raul Cordova of Vineland, N.J.

Action News was unable to reach Tuck. She also works at the local YMCA. A co-worker described her as a great person.

In a interview with a local newspaper, Tuck defended her ability to work around children despite her past career.

(edit)

The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

[wardaddy]

oh lord....i hope you are not the face of the future of Conservatism nor this forum

cry me a kumbaya river will ya?

[JRios1968]

Wow, the lunch ladies at my school never looked like that!

No, the lunch ladies at most schools were most accurately described by Adam Sandler...

[HamiltonJay]

I guess the old standbye insult of “you sleep with the lunch lady” doesn’t have quite the impact at this school.

[Stoat]

I guess the old standbye insult of “you sleep with the lunch lady” doesn’t have quite the impact at this school.

Indeed, and recess takes on a whole new meaning.  How can 8-12 year old boys with healthy, raging hormones possibly be expected to avoid fixating on AN ACTUAL PORN STAR on their playground?  Oh, the photo-swap sessions!  "Did you hear?  Joey has a high-def screenshot from her very first porno!" and "Ahmed has a photoshop of her with a goat!"

I still recall quite vividly how difficult a time the teachers had in maintaining discipline when I was a young stoat in elementary school, and having such an explosive distraction as this will most likely not exactly help toward the goal of imparting the 3 R's to kids whose imaginations have been so profoundly stimulated.

[Gone_Postal]

she worked in the lunch room..was she the milk lady

[fortunate sun]

WTF??????

I didn’t read anything about her having an abortion, supporting gun control, running an underground railroad for illegals, etc., etc.. All she did was do some porn, grow up!

[Titan Magroyne]

Geez dude, I'm a totally hetero female and not even I noticed the tattoo!

[visualops]

You are the Soup Nazi of sin:
Oh I see, you accuse me of ostracizing and vilifying while you spew the insults to defend a former porn star working with children.

Lighten up buddy, get some humor.

So according to you an adult who knowingly and willingly commits any immoral acts regardless how egregious the act should still be in a position that is easily accessible to children?

She was an exhibitionist/slut, not a pedophile. Any job dealing with the public gives one "access to children". I think you could better direct your energies towards approved curricula taught by all those non-former-porn-stars than a part-time lunch lady with a sleazy past.

[Man50D]

She participated in LEGAL ACTIVITIES with ADULTS, NOT CHILDREN.

You failed to grasp the obvious fact I stated any immoral act. An act can still be immoral even though it maybe legal.

There are many among them who would say that Christian Conservative heterosexuals shouldn't be allowed around children because of their world views.

Oh really? Then it shouldn't be a problem for you to give the names of those who have publicly made such statements and cite their comments with sources.

[Clemenza]

There are alot of folks who don’t like hardcore Christians, especially in my neck of the woods.

[Man50D]

Lighten up buddy, get some humor.

It's interesting you didn't indicate in your previous post to me you were joking.

She was an exhibitionist/slut, not a pedophile.

Oh I see. A former professional slut working with children is acceptable to you. Why not have a whole group of former whores working with your children?

I think you could better direct your energies towards approved curricula taught by all those non-former-porn-stars than a part-time lunch lady with a sleazy past.

I suggest you attempt to think for yourself. Your attempt to think for other people obviously isn't working.

[Man50D]

There are alot of folks who don’t like hardcore Christians, especially in my neck of the woods.

Does their definition of a "hardcore Christian" include someone who opposes former porn stars working in an occupation close to children?

[Clemenza]

No. There are plenty of non-religious people who don’t want pornstars around their children.

[ApplegateRanch]

employs a melody with one or more imitations.

Beleive me, her fictional body genuinely works, and her melony are both massy imitations, therefore canon fits; and she probably fakes fits of passion in front of the Canon lens, too.

[freebilly]

Who in there right mind would want their kids being taught by a slut? Porn star are sluts

Let's make her wear a scarlet "A" on her blouse, too....

[dancusa]

Talk about what pictures you find in Wikipedia. Look who I found on the Free Republic Wiki page.

Is that you Race? LOL!

[freebilly]

Her porn past should preclude her from any occupation that involves kids.

Why? How does her past threaten children?

[freebilly]

Why not have a whole group of former whores working with your children?

We do. They're called the NEA.

Maybe you need to rethink who the enemy is. It certainly isn't this woman who doesn't have an abortion rights, safe sex, and gay marriage agenda for your/our children.

[Man50D]

Why? How does her past threaten children?

Are you actually stating you would have no problem with ex porn stars in occupations associated with your children?

As I have stated in previous posts adults lead by example. Allowing someone to be in such an occupation gives the impression committing immoral acts are acceptable so long as you simply renounce them in the future. A person's past choices limit or expand future choices. Her past choice of knowingly, willingly and repeatedly participate in such immoral acts should preclude her from any occupation associated with very impressionable children. Her acts were too egregious for a simple renouncement to suffice.

It's sad to see the moral degradation has progressed so far in this country that this question actually has to be posed.

[Man50D]

Maybe you need to rethink who the enemy is. It certainly isn't this woman who doesn't have an abortion rights, safe sex, and gay marriage agenda for your/our children.

Speak for yourself.