[Man50D]

Why? How does her past threaten children?

Are you actually stating you would have no problem with ex porn stars in occupations associated with your children?

As I have stated in previous posts adults lead by example. Allowing someone to be in such an occupation gives the impression committing immoral acts are acceptable so long as you simply renounce them in the future. A person's past choices limit or expand future choices. Her past choice of knowingly, willingly and repeatedly participate in such immoral acts should preclude her from any occupation associated with very impressionable children. Her acts were too egregious for a simple renouncement to suffice.

It's sad to see the moral degradation has progressed so far in this country that this question actually has to be posed.

[freebilly]

Gee, immoral acts. Now that would not only encompass sexual immorality but would also encompass the breach of any ethical code of conduct that you endorse.

Therefore, you would favor preventing people who've had abortions from working with children (that eliminates about 25% of the female population)? Let's also prevent people who used to smoke pot from working with children (that eliminates some 60% of the population). Let's also prevent people who've cheated on their taxes, told a lie, committed adultery and stolen something in the past from working in cafeterias where our children eat.

Wow! The only people left are you and me. I've got a job, so good luck serving all those meals....