Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Milky Way's monster black hole awoke 300 years ago
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 4/15/08 | AFP

Posted on 04/15/2008 12:33:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

PARIS (AFP) - A black hole slumbering at the centre of our galaxy went into a "feeding frenzy" three centuries ago, the European Space Agency (ESA) said on Tuesday.

Located around 26,000 light years from Earth, the black hole, known as Sagittarius A-star (Sgr A*), is a monster with a mass four million times that of the Sun.

Japanese astronomers, using ESA's XMM-Newton orbital telescope and US and Japanese X-ray satellites, discovered that clouds of gas brightened and faded in X-ray light when they passed near Sgr A*'s maw, ESA said in a press release.

The phenomenon is due to X-ray pulses that are believed to be residual bursts from a flare that happened 300 years ago.

"We have wondered why the Milky Way's black hole appears to be a slumbering giant," team leader Tatsuya Inui of Kyoto University said.

"But now we realise that the black hole was far more active in the past. Perhaps it's just resting after a major outburst."

One theory is that a few centuries ago, the powerful gravitational pull of the black hole engulfed clouds of gas from an exploding star called a supernova, ESA said.

The "temporary feeding frenzy" caused X-ray energy to leap from its mouth in a giant flare.


TOPICS: Astronomy; Chit/Chat; Science
KEYWORDS: awoke; blackhole; catastrophism; milkyway; monster; sagittarius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Chandra's view of Sagittarius A*, the Milky Way's central black hole, in 2005. (AFP/NASA-HO/File)


1 posted on 04/15/2008 12:33:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=42587

X-ray Echoes of a Past Outburst of Sgr A*
15 Apr 2008

In a forthcoming paper, the history of the X-ray brightness of Sgr A*, the massive black hole at the heart of our Galaxy, is derived from observations made over a 11-year period by four X-ray observatories. The results are based on X-ray line emission from molecular clouds, considered to be reflecting Sgr A*’s X-ray emission with a delay time of 300 years.

Sgr A* is a compact radio source located at the dynamical centre of our Galaxy as confirmed by, for example, its apparent motion (solely due to our own motion around the Galactic centre) and the orbits of stars close to the Galactic centre. It is generally believed to be a massive black hole of several million solar masses.

Currently, Sgr A* is observed to be in a quiescent state. Its X-ray luminosity is several orders of magnitude below that of active galactic nuclei with a comparable sized black hole. This is the case even during the known frequent flaring events of Sgr A* when the flux increases by a factor of ~10. Observed events in our Galaxy’s central region actually occurred ~26 000 years ago as we are at a distance of about 8 kpc from the Galactic centre.

—snip—


2 posted on 04/15/2008 12:35:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
For some reason 26,000 light years doesn't seem far enough to dispel concern.
3 posted on 04/15/2008 12:37:28 PM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
went into a "feeding frenzy" three centuries ago ... located around 26,000 light years from Earth

Does this mean that we will begin to detect evidence of the feeding frenzy 25,700 years from now?

4 posted on 04/15/2008 12:37:39 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bush’s fault!


5 posted on 04/15/2008 12:39:49 PM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
For some reason 26,000 light years doesn't seem far enough to dispel concern.

Wake me up 25,999 years from now to be concerned.

6 posted on 04/15/2008 12:41:20 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Wow, 26,000 light years away and we know what happened 300 years ago. Time travel is here!!!


7 posted on 04/15/2008 12:44:17 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Yes... the Milky Way’s largest belch!


8 posted on 04/15/2008 12:44:17 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is my galaxie. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
(You may use it, but bus your own trays.)


9 posted on 04/15/2008 12:44:34 PM PDT by tumblindice (Quomodo cogis comas tuas sic videri?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

What has ME concerned are the remarks that the galaxy center is 26,000 years away.... and they are talking about xrays originating 300 years ago???

Ummm xrays are the same as light or other radio frequency energy, thus travel at the speed of light... Which means, we didn’t detect it YET if it just started “300 years” ago.

Someone has their head firmly planted somewhere other than in the stars, or in astrophysics (Astrophysics doesn’t change the math, sorry)


10 posted on 04/15/2008 12:44:56 PM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

No, it means it happened ~26,000 years ago, and we’re just now seeing it.

Yet another example of a “journalist” reporting on something way outside their depth.


11 posted on 04/15/2008 12:45:27 PM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If the gases illuminated when they passed near the black hole, and
If the black hole is 26,000 light years away, and
If the black hole awoke only 300 years ago, THEN
How could the brighter light from the illuminated gas have reached us by now to figure this out?

What do I know . . .I’m a only a banker.


12 posted on 04/15/2008 12:46:30 PM PDT by RatRipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Don’t we need to wait another 25,700 years to know what it was doing 300 years ago?


13 posted on 04/15/2008 12:47:22 PM PDT by LexBaird (Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

Yes. lol


14 posted on 04/15/2008 12:48:05 PM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Monster black hole? 300 years ago?

I had no idea Michael Moore was that old.


15 posted on 04/15/2008 12:49:19 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (In every good man a god doth dwell. -- Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; All

Whoever wrote this is an idiot. Here’s better explanation.

The black hole is 26,000 light years away. 300 years ago plus 26,000 years, a major supernova flare occured. It ejected massive clouds of gas. Those gases took 300 years to reach the vicinity of the black hole, and the effect the black hole had on that gas is just now reaching us. All the excitement happened back when humans were still duking it out with each other over who got the best mammoth steaks.


16 posted on 04/15/2008 12:50:00 PM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day

Or Helen Thomas!.............


17 posted on 04/15/2008 12:51:36 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The international agency has renamed Sgr A* as Algore:


18 posted on 04/15/2008 12:52:50 PM PDT by mikrofon (WARNING: Massive objects are much closer than they appear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
“The phenomenon is due to X-ray pulses that are believed to be residual bursts from a flare that happened 300 years ago.”

I am confused. If it is 26,000 light years away, how do we know what happened 300 years ago????

19 posted on 04/15/2008 12:54:04 PM PDT by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

John Wheeler not available for comment.


20 posted on 04/15/2008 12:55:33 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson