Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mortgage meltdown: The lawsuits
http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/16/real_estate/here_come_the_judgements/index.htm?postversion=200708201 ^ | 8-20-07 | Les Christie,

Posted on 08/20/2007 9:56:04 AM PDT by Hydroshock

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Earlier this year, a Wisconsin couple won a judgment against Chevy Chase Bank that said the bank deceived them over the terms of their mortgage.

The judge ordered Chevy Chase to rescind the loan and certified the lawsuit as class-action, which could potentially release thousands of other borrowers who felt misled.

Current Mortgage Rates

Type Overall avgs

30 yr fixed mtg 6.24% 15 yr fixed mtg 5.89% 30 yr fixed jumbo mtg 7.08% 5/1 ARM 6.11% 5/1 jumbo ARM 6.57%

Find personalized rates:

Video More video

Tim Hughes of the IG Index joins CNN to talk about the U.S. market's impact around the world. Play video

According to their attorney, Bryan and Susan Andrews believed they were getting a loan with a fixed 1.95 percent annual interest rate for the first five years. What they got was an option adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM); the 1.95 percent rate only applied for the first month and rose every month afterwards.

"The second month, the interest rate was about 5 percent," said their attorney Kevin Demet. "After a year it was about 7 percent and now it's in the 8s."

The bank said it clearly spelled out the loan terms, but the judge found that Chevy Chase violated the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), which mandates that mortgage documents must be clear and understandable. Chevy Chase is appealing the judgment, and did not respond for comment for this article.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: applesonly5cents; depression; despair; doom; dustbowl; grapesofwrath; lawsuits; lawyers; mortgage; realestatebubble; speculation; subprime; vulturegram
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Aquamarine

What was the after-improved value of the home? Might not be such a bad deal.


61 posted on 08/21/2007 3:20:29 PM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson once set fire to a crowd of liberals simply by puffing his cigar and staring real hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ExSES

If you know that going in, that’s one thing. Too many didn’t either out of ignorance or bad/deceptive marketing.

There is a place for a negative-amortization loan. That place is for investors who have a LOT of net worth and are leveraging their money.

They’re NOT for Joe and Jane Smith living paycheck to paycheck or barely better than that.


62 posted on 08/21/2007 3:22:11 PM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson once set fire to a crowd of liberals simply by puffing his cigar and staring real hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Everything has SOME risk. Some of us are more tolerant than others.

Buying a home zero-down, with no reserves in cash, at 9% interest on a monthly variable is just dumb.

Using a 5 year ARM because you’re 99% sure you’ll move, is a moderate risk, but not stupid. There are levels of risk.


63 posted on 08/21/2007 3:23:40 PM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson once set fire to a crowd of liberals simply by puffing his cigar and staring real hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

So you don’t invest in a 401k either, right?


64 posted on 08/21/2007 3:24:50 PM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson once set fire to a crowd of liberals simply by puffing his cigar and staring real hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Yes I am giving the minimum to getthe maximum matching i 401K. And yes you can not idiot proof everythig, but if the contracts were written about 7th grade english, about what a newspaper is written in. So the the majority can understand what they are signing. Nothing is idiot proof (the universe is actively developing better idiots) but it does not have to be written in legalize either.


65 posted on 08/21/2007 3:38:33 PM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
There is a place for a negative-amortization loan. That place is for investors who have a LOT of net worth and are leveraging their money. They’re NOT for Joe and Jane Smith living paycheck to paycheck or barely better than that.

I agree! Unfortunately, a lot of Joe/Jane Smiths became convinced that "they could get rich quick" (watching too many infomercials, etc.). Sadly, the "Ever Skyrocketing Real Estate Values" are not skyrocketing enough (sic) to allow them to make their fortunes by selling to a "greater fool"!

Mortgage brokers were more than happy to write any manner of mortgages for them and pass the "trash paper" on to CMO "Wizards" who, in turn, have "passed the trash" to investors who really don't know what they truly own now (and won't for quite some time!)

66 posted on 08/21/2007 4:58:03 PM PDT by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock; M. Espinola; Pelham; Calpernia; Vince Ferrer; GodGunsGuts; Fractal Trader; ...
Treasury Bill Yields Fall Most Since 1987 on Money Fund Demand

Well, I can not post excerpts from the source. FR regulations, you know? But it seems that some very smart people think the markets are in a total 'fear mode.' Market Geee Gaaaws driven by profit taking and fear is about right. IMHO: The old Wall Street 'pump and dump con game is in full force. Yada, Yada.`

67 posted on 08/21/2007 7:32:43 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
How do you prove that Chevy Chase bank in fact decieved you, and you’re not just stupid?

That would be tough. Especially if the terms of the mortgage are accurately explained in writing on the document you signed.

68 posted on 08/22/2007 6:50:19 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

It turned out the home was full of mold and termites. Still want that loan?


69 posted on 08/22/2007 8:11:38 AM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine

I wouldn’t touch anything like that, neither would I advise my clients to.

However, that’s more a function of the property itself than a loan program.


70 posted on 08/22/2007 8:15:03 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson once set fire to a crowd of liberals simply by puffing his cigar and staring real hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: CSM
I don't think it comes down to stupidity either. A lot of the folks out there who signed on to "bad" ARMs just lost sight of the maxim, "If it seems too good to be true, it is." Okay, that could be considered stupid, but it's liberally peppered with greed.

A lot of the other folks with bad ARMs are first-time home buyers, and largely uneducated in real estate or finance. Not necessarily stupid--it can be very difficult to know what questions to ask of a lender. Too often buyers rely on the advice of their real estate agent, which is the worst possible mistake to make. Agents are interested in 6% and nothing else. Once you sign that mortgage, they don't give a damn what happens to you.

I must admit, it has been my own lack of education with regard to finance and real estate that has saved my butt (yes, I am calling myself stupid!). I know I'm not an expert, so I ask every possible question I can dream up, great big long lists of them. I don't sign anything until I have all of those questions answered in language I can understand. Then, I do the math, figuring out every possible scenario. If there is any possibility that a mortgage is too risky five years down the road, it is too risky now. Kind of funny, really--I am quite a thrill-seeker in so many aspects of my life, but when it comes to finances I'm the most sober person you'll ever come across.

Just an aside: The house next door to me was foreclosed last summer (4bed, 2 bath, 1700 sf Vic). An Arbor Mortgage franchisee bought it two months ago for $50K and just yesterday put it back on the market. I don't know what they have it listed for yet. They haven't done one minute of work on the place, and it needs some attention. Along with their "For Sale By Owner" sign, they have a "Zero Down" sign.

The more things change, the more they stay the same!

71 posted on 08/22/2007 9:31:22 AM PDT by grellis (Femininists for Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Can't understand why the bank wanted to loan money out for such a bad investment unless they thought the 2 acres that the house (that really needed to be condemned) sat on was worth the risk - or they may have planned to sell the mortgage to some other investment institution.
Either way they had no qualms about destroying a young man's future.
72 posted on 08/22/2007 10:28:25 AM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine

It does seem odd. However, I’d have to see the whole deal to see what was up. Did they in fact know about the mold and issues? Were they just releasing all the cash, or were they requiring proof it was actually being used to repair the property?


73 posted on 08/22/2007 10:30:40 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson once set fire to a crowd of liberals simply by puffing his cigar and staring real hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: grellis

Do you invest in stocks? Mutual funds? 401K?

I’m curious. So many who would put $10,000 into a speculative stock are scared to death of a variable rate mortgage...when the former is a LOT risker than the latter.


74 posted on 08/22/2007 10:32:33 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson once set fire to a crowd of liberals simply by puffing his cigar and staring real hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Our retirement savings and the kids' college savings are the only two areas of personal finance of which my husband has control--I look after the paperwork, that's about it. We have a traditional IRA which seems to be a slow-growth way to go--each month, the account is a tiny bit beefier. Same with the college fund. Since we're a long way from retirement, and since I will probably be returning to the workforce this fall, I don't mind slow, steady investment growth.

I'm not scared silly about ARMs--like I've said, I have an ARM on my primary mortgage, and I am satisfied with it. I did my research before signing, though. I don't see that as caving in to fright, I think of it as responsible investing.

75 posted on 08/22/2007 12:05:17 PM PDT by grellis (Femininists for Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

The part of the story that made me weak from anger was the young man said his real estate agent was a Christian and she was praying about it for him. That caused him to put complete trust in her. He was only 21.


76 posted on 08/24/2007 9:43:50 AM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson