Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did NASA Accidentally “Nuke” Jupiter?
enterprisemission.com ^ | 2003 | Richard C. Hoagland

Posted on 04/10/2007 10:35:33 PM PDT by grundle

On September 21, 2003 NASA deliberately directed its amazing, still-functioning Galileo spacecraft to make one final, 108,000 mph suicidal plunge into Jupiter’s vast atmosphere.

The intent of this unfortunate decision was to protect Europa, one of those Jovian moons.

Van der Worp claimed that, plunging into Jupiter’s deep and increasingly dense atmosphere, the on-board Galileo electrical power supply – a set of 144 plutonium-238 fuel pellets... would ultimately “implode”; that the plutonium Galileo carried would ultimately collapse in upon itself under the enormous pressures of Jupiter’s overwhelming atmosphere—

As the capsules continue to fall deeper through the primarily hydrogen atmosphere, the surrounding pressure/density continues to rise, to thousands of times Earth’s surface density and pressure. The capsules are now falling at a constant rate, approximately one mile per hour

At this ultra-slow “terminal velocity,” it takes the Galileo plutonium-238 capsules on the order of 700 hours – a month! to fall to a depth inside Jupiter (~700 miles below the visible clouds) where the outside pressure of the surrounding liquid hydrogen literally crushes the plutonium capsules into a supercritical state—

At this point, one of the capsules randomly implodes … and initiates, via the resulting shockwave and intense neutron shower, a runaway nuclear chain reaction in all the other surviving capsules, now spread in a spherical falling “cloud” a few tens of miles across ~700 miles below Jupiter’s visible “surface.” The resulting cascade nuclear detonation of all the surviving capsules totals several tens of kilotons ….

The deliberate destruction of Galileo to “save” Europa, and the sudden appearance of “a mysterious dark splotch” on Jupiter just one month later -- precisely time enough to get the entering plutonium down to a depth where it could catastrophically implode – is truly a remarkable “coincidence.”

(Excerpt) Read more at enterprisemission.com ...


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: hoaxland; moonbatalert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Billthedrill

LOL I was hoping somebody could come up with that reference


61 posted on 04/11/2007 7:56:50 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This is a really old article.


62 posted on 04/11/2007 7:58:18 AM PDT by RightWhale (3 May '07 3:14 PM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; grundle; Yo-Yo
Did NASA Accidentally “Nuke” Jupiter?
Posted on 11/07/2003 11:18:58 AM CST by Yo-Yo
63 posted on 04/11/2007 8:02:28 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Damn that Bush!! Randomly nuking peaceful planets! He’s going to start an intergalactic war!!


64 posted on 04/11/2007 8:42:57 AM PDT by Tatze (I'm in a state of taglinelessness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Any input?


65 posted on 04/11/2007 8:50:01 AM PDT by Teacher317 (Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Too stupid to know its “Pu239” not 238.


66 posted on 04/11/2007 8:54:26 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeon Cowboy
Do you know how huge the planet Jupiter is? It would take a hundred thousand nuclear bombs detonated at once to have any kind of significant effect.

Wasn't Shoemaker-Levy on the order of 100 Megatons? It had a dramatic and visible effect.

It is hard to see anything puny humankind can do would any noticable effect on Jupiter.

67 posted on 04/11/2007 9:03:21 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
Yeah, I saw this thread already.

One of Hoagland's more interesting theories is that Mars was once a moon of Planet "V" that later exploded. He makes a very good case.

However, he lost me way back when he claimed there was remnants of a glass dome on the Moon, and you could see them in NASA Moon photos. Therefore I don't care if he is right or not about Mars, he's a (with apologies to waterfowl everywhere) at total LOON.


68 posted on 04/11/2007 9:47:06 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets; Zeon Cowboy

In fact, the photo of Jupiter in post #27 shows the after effects of the Schoemaker-Levy impact. (The white round spots in the “Southern” hemisphere.)


69 posted on 04/11/2007 9:49:04 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Of all the competing theories, the strongest seems to be a worn out comet nucleus for Tunguska. It was even seen prior to it’s impact by a young farm boy in 1908. As you know, a comet is a dirty snowball and when all the “snow” has been boiled away what’s left is a loose, black, dirtball. That’s a perfect candidate for a butterfly explosion 5 miles above the surface.


70 posted on 04/11/2007 9:59:20 AM PDT by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

You forgot one of my favorites, NASA is controlled by a secret cabal that believes in some ancient Egyptian religion.


71 posted on 04/11/2007 10:19:57 AM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GreenOgre

Those are some good points that you raise.


72 posted on 04/11/2007 10:32:41 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

I thought it was an interesting article. I didn’t say
I agreed with it.


73 posted on 04/11/2007 10:34:42 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

LOL - I’d like to know what kind of drugs this kook is hooked on.


74 posted on 04/11/2007 10:47:00 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (I have a big carbon footprint and I'm not afraid to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

This is either Wormhole Xtreme or Stargate kookiness.

People are living in slavery (literally in somalia), we have uncontained borders to our south allowing people who want to kill us, and we have to pay attention to a lunatic who does not know one iota of nuclear physics tell us that Jupiter has a fever caused by GWBush.


75 posted on 04/11/2007 10:54:32 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

I don’t want to discuss Hoagland’s work. It’s not worth anyone’s time to do so.

I think total BS should not be posted o FR. The harm these people do to some normal thinking people is great.

In order to believe the BS they spout every day you first have to believe that our government is 100% evil and all our leaders in on it. Most of the “leaders” in the conspiracy movement are closet communist trying to fragment people to start a “third way”

I don’t trust any of them. If it’s a lie way talk about and why post it?


76 posted on 04/11/2007 11:19:34 AM PDT by Goldwater and Gingrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Thanks for the 411.


77 posted on 04/11/2007 7:08:09 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
From the article: What van der Worp had suggested, in terms of Galileo, was merely a variant on the now well-known design of the “Fat Boy” plutonium nuclear weapon used against Nagasaki at the end of World War II -- an “implosion” plutonium reaction (below).

The reason this is complete and utter hogwash is that Pu238 (Not Pu239) is used in RTGs and is not a fissile material.

There are a number of conditions that must be met for a material to be fissile (sustain a nuclear chain reaction):

1) Higher on the periodic table of the elements than Radium.
2) High probability of neutron capture.
3) Release at least two neutrons upon neutron capture.
4) Long enough half life.

A rule of thumb is that the odd mass numbers are fissile while the even ones are not. (This is due to the binding energy in the nucleus) Thusly:

U233, U235, and Pu239 are fissile where U234, U238, and Pu238 are not.

(Note: there is a U237, however, the halflife is only about 6 days. Not long enough to be a viable material.)

78 posted on 04/12/2007 6:53:41 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Bell is a late night comic book on radio. That has been the appeal, the fact you really don’t need to think while trying to go to sleep.


79 posted on 04/12/2007 12:50:16 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
As I recall, you get a “bonus” of 1 MeV when you go from odd to even numbers of nucleons in the neutron capture event. The binding energy gets you about 5 MeV, the “bonus” of 1 MeV going from odd to even gets you one more, for a total of 6 MeV, just the amount you need to add to the nucleus to induce the fission reaction. U238 neutron capture goes from even to odd, so you don’t get the bonus. The 5 MeV you get from the binding energy isn’t enough to do it for thermal neutron-induced fission. You need an incoming “fast” neutron (1 MeV or more) to fission the U238 nucleus. So it is a threshold reaction rather than a thermal neutron capture. Do I have the numbers right (it’s been awhile)?
80 posted on 04/12/2007 1:19:11 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson