Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RadioAstronomer

Any input?


65 posted on 04/11/2007 8:50:01 AM PDT by Teacher317 (Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317
From the article: What van der Worp had suggested, in terms of Galileo, was merely a variant on the now well-known design of the “Fat Boy” plutonium nuclear weapon used against Nagasaki at the end of World War II -- an “implosion” plutonium reaction (below).

The reason this is complete and utter hogwash is that Pu238 (Not Pu239) is used in RTGs and is not a fissile material.

There are a number of conditions that must be met for a material to be fissile (sustain a nuclear chain reaction):

1) Higher on the periodic table of the elements than Radium.
2) High probability of neutron capture.
3) Release at least two neutrons upon neutron capture.
4) Long enough half life.

A rule of thumb is that the odd mass numbers are fissile while the even ones are not. (This is due to the binding energy in the nucleus) Thusly:

U233, U235, and Pu239 are fissile where U234, U238, and Pu238 are not.

(Note: there is a U237, however, the halflife is only about 6 days. Not long enough to be a viable material.)

78 posted on 04/12/2007 6:53:41 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson