To: Lunatic Fringe
A U.S. judge has little to no say.
2 posted on
12/29/2006 6:09:33 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
3 posted on
12/29/2006 6:09:35 PM PST by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Because it was out of his jurisdiction?
4 posted on
12/29/2006 6:09:39 PM PST by
Cyclops08
To: Lunatic Fringe
A U.S. judge has refused to delay Saddam Hussein's execution. Good. Not that I think he really had any jurisdiction to do so, anyway!
It might delay or cancel my brother's leave, but it has to be done--and sooner is better than later!
5 posted on
12/29/2006 6:10:38 PM PST by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Lunatic Fringe
US Judges have no say in this at all.
7 posted on
12/29/2006 6:10:41 PM PST by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
It would have been funnier if he had delayed it...and been totally ignored. ;)
8 posted on
12/29/2006 6:10:53 PM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Well, that's a switch!
I thought for sure some pudding-brained, Democrat-appointed idiot was going to stick his/her oar into the water by issuing an injunction.
9 posted on
12/29/2006 6:11:06 PM PST by
Ronin
(Ut iusta esse, lex noblis severus necesse est.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Tick, tock, tick, tock...
10 posted on
12/29/2006 6:11:12 PM PST by
Slings and Arrows
(Tell Tom Vilsack to WEAR THE BEAR!)
To: Lunatic Fringe
So many good people die. Can just one evil son of a bitch die?
To: Lunatic Fringe
Is there an actual link to this?
To: Lunatic Fringe
Good. I'll bet they picked some idiot leftist appointed by Carter or Clinton to bring this appeal to, but even an idiot leftist knows that he'd only look weak and foolish if he issued an unenforceable ruling.
13 posted on
12/29/2006 6:12:57 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Lunatic Fringe
The U.S. does not have jurisdiction. Saddam was tried by Iraqi courts.
alan colmes just mentioned this also. it would have been funny to see a dumb judge ignored, but oh well.
15 posted on
12/29/2006 6:13:11 PM PST by
isom35
To: Lunatic Fringe
Plus, he has no controlling legal authority.
16 posted on
12/29/2006 6:13:29 PM PST by
MarkeyD
(The tree of liberty must from time to time be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
In related news, another US Judge has refused to order the Sun to revolve around the Earth.
19 posted on
12/29/2006 6:17:58 PM PST by
TexGuy
To: Lunatic Fringe
Heavens to Murgatroid! Is there still time to appeal to the United Nations World Court?! The ICC even.
20 posted on
12/29/2006 6:18:01 PM PST by
kcar
(o.o)
To: Lunatic Fringe
I'm not a death penalty sort of person, but I don't know what else fits a situation like this.
Life in prison really doesn't work in countries where you don't have a stable government. The perp could be out tomorrow as a result of political changes. This is not just true of Iraqi, but many if not most countries.
23 posted on
12/29/2006 6:19:20 PM PST by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: Lunatic Fringe
29 posted on
12/29/2006 6:48:42 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Waiting for the video on YouTube.
The sumbitch will join Chauchesceau, Hitler, etc.
Fry in hell you pos!
To: Lunatic Fringe
>>>
U.S. judge refuses to delay Saddam Hussein's execution.<<<
Good....its not his job!!
Lucky SC Justice Kennedy didn't get to decide - he would hae used "International Law" to come up with a decision...and you know what it would be!
33 posted on
12/29/2006 7:06:25 PM PST by
HardStarboard
(Give Pelosi and Reid Enough Rope to Hang Themselves.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
