Posted on 02/04/2006 6:31:13 PM PST by Calpernia
A lone milkman is delivering misery to the doorstep of the giant dairy industry.
Hein Hettinga was once a simple dairy farmer who sold raw milk from his farm in Chino, Calif. Today the Dutch immigrant has expanded his operation so much, so fast, that some of the biggest dairy companies and cooperatives in the U.S. have banded together against him. They are lobbying for federal laws to close loopholes they claim he exploits. Mr. Hettinga counters that the only purpose of the proposed legislation is to kill competition -- and keep milk prices high.
"That's not right," says the 63-year-old farmer.
The milk fight, which is being watched in the industry from coast to coast, started because Mr. Hettinga runs a rare hybrid operation. Most dairy businesses either only produce milk, or only process it. He does both. As a result, he falls into a protected class that isn't bound by an arcane system of Depression-era federal rules. Under it, milk processors selling into specific geographical areas, which cover most of the country, must all pay into that area's pool for subsidizing milk prices. But so-called producer-distributors have always been exempt.
Mr. Hettinga also has avoided pricing rules at the state level. Because he has a bottling plant in Yuma, Ariz., that ships milk into California, he isn't covered by Golden State regulations. That means his costs are lower than those of rival processors; he can sell his milk for less. By some estimates, his entrance into the Southern California market lowered milk prices for retailers by 20 cents a gallon -- though the dairy industry in California says consumers haven't seen the savings at the grocery store.
Feeling Mr. Hettinga's regulatory end run is legal but unfair, dairy-processing giant Dean Foods Co., supermarket chain Kroger Co. and the Dairy Farmers of America, the nation's largest such cooperative, are backing bills introduced in Congress in recent months by California Republican Rep. Devin Nunes, a former dairyman, and Sen. Jon Kyl, a Republican from Arizona. The bills would force the smaller operators doing business in those two states to pay into the pool if they grow to a certain size.
Mr. Hettinga is a standout in U.S. agriculture. He has figured out how to thrive as an independent farmer when the American farm belt is dominated by corporations. Cargill Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. have consolidated the business of grinding and milling grain. Tyson Foods Inc. has done the same in meat. Now Dean Foods and the Dairy Farmers of America are working on a similar feat with milk. Dean already controls a third of all milk that is consumed in America annually and DFA represents more than a third of fresh milk produced.
The showdown on the West Coast has national implications. The Virginia State Dairymen's Association says the legislative crackdown would protect the state's dairy industry from similar unregulated incursions such as California is facing.
The International Dairy Foods Association, the largest group representing processors in the country, and the National Milk Producers Federation, a collective of cooperatives, call the emergence of large farm operations that could also package their own milk a national issue of "critical concern."
The growth of producer-distributors, they argue, would disrupt a system developed in the 1930s to ensure that Americans would have stable access to milk. Because the product is perishable, in the old system, big processors exerted so much market clout over small dairy farmers that they strong-armed pricing, sometimes causing shortages in the milk supply. The current rules give farmers more predictable milk prices.
Under the federal regulation and California's state system, processors now pay a set price into a pool based on how they will use the raw milk, for cheese, yogurt or bottling. The pool is averaged, and that sets a minimum price guaranteed to farmers. Farmers like Mr. Hettinga who also bottle their own milk -- a group whose numbers have actually been shrinking -- were exempted from the pricing provisions partly because they were such small-time operations that they were negligible market forces.
Mr. Hettinga moved as a child from Holland to Southern California in 1949 with his family. After high school, he took a job working with livestock, first milking cows, then later trimming hooves and castrating bulls. By the early 1970s, he was running his first dairy farm, in Chino. He joined local cooperatives and expanded his business, buying up seven dairies in Southern California and Nevada in the next two decades.
In 1994, he built a $160,000 bottling plant for his own milk in Yuma. He began shipping to nearby Mexico and elsewhere in Arizona, competing with the farm cooperative United Dairymen of Arizona, which says it controls 80 percent of the state's raw milk supply. He undercut his rivals and soon was selling milk in discount supermarkets across the state. As the stores multiplied, so did his milk sales, more than tripling in less than a decade. He now supplies more than 10 percent of the bottled milk in Arizona, about 25 million gallons annually, he says.
"He went from a curiosity to an irritation to a real problem in the marketplace in a relatively short period of time," says Bill Shiek, an economist with the Dairy Institute of California.
His opponents were particularly riled by Mr. Hettinga's building a $12.5-million milk-processing plant in Yuma. The plant supplies about 700,000 gallons of milk a month to more than 20 Costco Wholesale Corp. stores across the border in Southern California.
Dairy farmers in California and Arizona say Mr. Hettinga is costing them millions of dollars a month by not having to pay into either of the two states' price pools. "The farmers just want everybody to play by the same set of rules that they have to play by," says Mike Marsh, president of the Western United Dairymen, a large industry group in California.
Defiant, Mr. Hettinga has taken his battle to the streets. Last year, he slapped about 50 giant stickers on the backs of all his milk tankers and trucks. They read: "Stop the milk monopolies from raising your milk prices!"
Jerseys also have a sweet personality.
But lately my eyes have been opened regarding the raising of cattle. Years ago we kept a few to grow out for meat. They seemed relatively trouble free. So a couple of months ago we thought we would buy a couple to grow for our own use.
Just this week we had another part Angus calf go bad, but thanks to one of the new high powered expensive antibiotics he's doing fine. The vet says he had a common infection that causes polio type symptoms in young cattle and depletes their reserves of thiamine.
I also can't believe all the feeds you can buy with the antibiotics and growth inhancers already added. We are getting to feel that it would be almost impossible to grow a beef to market weight without adding lots of artificial ingredients. This will be our last calf.
I remember my grandfather talking about the time U.S. Army troops showed up at his farm in Quay County, NM with an "authorization" to shoot his dairy herd. They did, and left.
Can't remember if it was the 1930's or 1940's.
I'm trying to contact my Father, and will post details when I can.
Am I the only one getting tired of republicans stabbing us in the back?
An understatement, I'm sure!
Raw, whole milk is healthy and beneficial, but pasteurized milk is an unnatural substance that wreaks havoc in our bodies, and is a big contributor to the development of insulin insensitivity, leading to diabetes.
We milked between 25 and 40 cows,Jerseys,Guernseys and Holsteins at the end.
The worst thing imo that happened to the family farm are subsidies,which of course encourage greater production.
That leads the processors and the haulers to try and force out the smaller producers as it is more profitable to fill a truck with one pick up than to have to travel many miles and get that truckload from 20 smaller pick ups.
Get bigger or get out is the usual option.
Sooner or later there is a fallout as supply outstrips demand as there is a guaranteed market(government).Than the price drops as the gov cuts back the subsidy to discourage production and the market can`t absorb the product without the government buying and stockpiling in the form of cheese.
The farm that is too close to the edge,often debt incurred while expanding at the wrong point of the cycle,goes out of business.
Supplies eventually catch up with demand and the whole thing starts all over again.
BTTT
I miss raw milk. It tastes nothing like what I have to buy in a store now.
The cream in the morning after the milk man would come would be floating at the top of the milk bottles.
I posted it to Chat Elk.
There is a moderator here at FR that takes Front Page posts and moves them to Blogger.
I found, if I just post to chat, they don't get moved.
I would rather have articles posted to Chat, that goes out on the RSS feed that people subscribe to.
If it gets moved to blogger, there is no RSS script reading.
I even got suspended from FR for 24 hours for posting 'too many' articles to Front Page news. And they were all ICE press releases.
How about trying goats then?
I think I need a Kleenex.
L
Weird, isn't it.
I've found that the "extended news" checkbox keeps marginal stuff in the main forum sometimes.
In any event, thanks for posting this.
I hear ya, E-S. You're not alone.
"Altadena Dairy (So. Cal.) used to sell raw milk products years ago, but I guess they got hassled out of doing so, and now all their stuff is pasteurized."
They still make cheese from raw milk. I just bought some.
Nowadays it takes no more to become a Republican than to be an EnvironMentalist!!!
You just go down to Walgreen's and get a bottle of Johnson & Johnson's baby oil, open it up and pour it on your head and proclaim... "I'M A DANGED REPUBLICAN!!!"
Same process to become a "Conservative CA FReeper!!!"
"pasteurized milk is an unnatural substance that wreaks havoc in our bodies, and is a big contributor to the development of insulin insensitivity, leading to diabetes."
Consuming over 3 gallons of it a week for over 60 years (didn't consume quite that much before I was 8) I must be ready to die according to you.
That doesn't count the over a gallon of ice cream I eat each week.
What I meant was that both producers of bottled unpasturized milk could sell much more if they had it to sell. They are both enlarging their herds and operations. I.E. the (polite) demand of the customers, who are frequently unsupplied with as much milk as they want, outstrips the supply of the product. In time one hopes that the supply will grow to meet the (also growing) demand. The high prices now paid for raw milk products helps the two existing producers to capitalize expansion and hopefully will attract new producers.
I am not an economist and apologise if I abused the terms.
Can anyone tell me why milk is over $3.00 a gallon when gasoline is only at $2.20 a gallon and costs a hell of a lot more to produce? The DFA is complaining? We should complain.
I've been lucky too, with similar consumption much of my life, but many others are not so fortunate. Getting away with murder doesn't make it legal ;o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.