Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/30/2006 8:45:33 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: churchillbuff
One could argue he’s what we want the American man to be."""

No one couldn't -- unless one is a homo.

2 posted on 01/30/2006 8:46:40 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Both characters are married with kids.


"Love".


3 posted on 01/30/2006 8:46:43 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

YYYUUUCCCKKK!


6 posted on 01/30/2006 8:49:14 PM PST by russesjunjee (Islam and the mainstream media worship the same master...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
... and he’s taciturn and bottled-up in the way of men...no sterotyping there, for sure......
7 posted on 01/30/2006 8:50:24 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
He talks with his fists, and sometimes he talks too much

I've heard that homos do that to each other; I can't imagine it...

10 posted on 01/30/2006 8:51:20 PM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

"Love that dare not speak its name?" This is the gay "passion." Remember last year how they shunned Mel Gibson's movie? Now they are in ecstacy because THEIR world view is being celebrated.


11 posted on 01/30/2006 8:51:38 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

"Love?" No, it ain't the "love." It's the sodomy.


12 posted on 01/30/2006 8:52:33 PM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Since when is two adulterous sheep herders getting into homosexuality an act of love? Seems it was an act of betrayal regarding their vows and marriages on film.

Sick stuff IMO.
14 posted on 01/30/2006 8:52:52 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Sexual perversion is now "Love".


16 posted on 01/30/2006 8:54:58 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

More than a love story...really about loneliness...he's a guy who fights with his fists...I think I'm gonna hurl!

It's about an agenda. That's it.


17 posted on 01/30/2006 8:55:21 PM PST by Theresawithanh (Always remember that you're unique. Just like everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Gaauugghh!!!  Ick!

18 posted on 01/30/2006 8:55:54 PM PST by MarineBrat (Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
"Heath Ledger’s Ennis del Mar feels like the man in the film — in the one sex scene, he gives rather than receives —"

Oh, I get it, because 'he gives rather than receives', this is somehow supposed to cleanse the twisted, filthy, disgusting debauchery he performed on his 'partner'. I've had enough of this Humpback Mountain crap; Hollywood has sunk to the deepest, rottenist pits on earth and they're all too corrupted to realize they're rolling in $#!t.

19 posted on 01/30/2006 8:55:59 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Since a movie about gay sheepherders coming out of the closet has done so well, I heard they're going to make a movie about gay midgets coming out if the cupboard.


21 posted on 01/30/2006 8:57:47 PM PST by BikerTrash (Enough already with the carnival freak show...bring back COOL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

"he gives rather than receives"

I've always heard that was the thing to do but now I have a different outlook on it.


22 posted on 01/30/2006 8:57:58 PM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

If the minority sexual group called gays want poo poo on their penis that's fine, let them do whatever they want in the privacy of their own bedrooms but don't call me racist or mentally ill because I don't want to see, hear, or read about it.


23 posted on 01/30/2006 8:59:27 PM PST by Dallas59 ((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Couldn't get through this syrupy-sweet article--in fact, I can't get more than a paragraph or two into ANY of these stupid mash notes, which all begin like this: My liberal male friends were all averse to this movie (none of these writers have any conservative friends) and they LOVED it, so that makes it a great classic!

In the interests of fairness, though, there is one thing these simps have in their corner--the movie is a real hit. And I find it amusing that while I was almost the sole voice arguing that this thing would be a hit, that it was not the loser some here tried to claim, and that even though those who don't know anything about the movie industry kept shouting "Failure!" and sending notes to my email box...no one around here seems to be talking about its box office "failure" anymore...

Sorry, but if I'm gonna rap the MSM for their biased pro-gay agenda cheerleading, FReepers have to take the hit for their disingenuousness about the FINANCIAL story here.

What will be an interesting comparison though is how the next 'Passion' will be treated by these same pundits. They will either do what they did with Narnia--"Christian content? WHAT Christian content?!"--or go back to the old "anti-semitism" truncheon. That would be like saying BBM is anti-woman and anti-marriage because it seems (I have no intention of actually seeing this snoozefest) to promote screwing around on your wife...which Hollywood seems to think is bad, apparently, unless it's with a guy.

24 posted on 01/30/2006 9:00:15 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/#quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Gene Shalett reviewed this film. He said something like it was 'a story about a sexual predator attacking a cowboy.' Now all of Hollyweird is lining up to praise it. That must be one reason why people are not going to see movies anymore. 'Nuff said.


25 posted on 01/30/2006 9:00:42 PM PST by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

I keep thinking of Taco del Mar.


26 posted on 01/30/2006 9:00:58 PM PST by Daralundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
One could argue he’s what we want the American man to be.

No. Actually, hell no. I don't want a homosexual or bisexual adulterer as the "American man."

27 posted on 01/30/2006 9:01:24 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
I read the whole review. It really made me angry to read. This flaming POS thinks America is waiting on the edge of its seat to learn all about homosexual "love".
28 posted on 01/30/2006 9:12:58 PM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson