Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Free Republic Folding@Home Project update - We're in the TOP 850!!!
systematic ^ | 1-2-2006 | systematic

Posted on 01/02/2006 9:53:26 AM PST by systematic

New thread for this week.

Congrats to all new members who joined this week!

We've made excellent progress so far and have smoked the DUmmies and Kossacks. Let's keep folding!


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: computernerds; computers; cpu; cureforcancer; du; dummies; fah; folders; folding; foldinghome; geeks; kos; proteins; seti; software; spyware; stanford; technology; techs; worthwhilecauses
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 661-672 next last
To: SC Swamp Fox
Hey, I had the model I. 16K of RAM standard, upgradeable to a whopping 48K if you bought the "Expansion Unit", which was about the size of a modern VCR. But hey, you also got an RS-232 port with the expansion, so it was all good. :)
301 posted on 01/02/2006 10:24:32 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Seamoth

Win3.1 came on five floppies.


302 posted on 01/02/2006 10:24:36 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
OTOH, I think we should all get one vote per work unit, and in that vein, I'll take my three votes and STHU

I'll just go along with damn near anything, as long as 36120 hangs together, and cast my 1 vote, in with everyone elses..

303 posted on 01/02/2006 10:28:42 PM PST by Klutz Dohanger (*ouch*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Klutz Dohanger
Please explain to me why we should be competing with DU and DailyKos to help Stanford University.

I don't get it.

304 posted on 01/02/2006 10:30:11 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Win3.1 came on five floppies. Oh.. I beg to differ, 6 floppies, if you counted the printer driver floppy :) Then came "bloatware", and MS Office came out on that magnificently streamlined 38 floppy disk set :)
305 posted on 01/02/2006 10:31:54 PM PST by Klutz Dohanger (*ouch*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Here's one explanation...

What we are doing is NOT for...
Stanford
FreeRepublic
DU
Kos

...or anything BESIDES helping with research that has already given benefits that have impacted the lives of humans. THAT is why we do it.

The "competition" aspect is just an additional motivator.

Typing this on my pocket PC, please excuse any mistakes...

:O)

P
306 posted on 01/02/2006 10:34:06 PM PST by papasmurf (Help beat the DUmmies...Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home Team# 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

Is that a PC in your pocket or are you just glad to see us?


307 posted on 01/02/2006 10:35:21 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Klutz Dohanger

Thirty-eight floppies? LOL


Thirty-seven of which are useless if one fails? LOLOLOL


308 posted on 01/02/2006 10:36:46 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

From what I've read of the many, many posts of this, you are helping Stanford.


309 posted on 01/02/2006 10:37:55 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Please explain to me why we should be competing with DU and DailyKos to help Stanford University. I don't get it

The cause is a good one. We donate our excess CPU cycles, to perform complex mathematical calculations, which furthers research into mutant proteins, such as those believed to cause Alzheimers, various forms of cancer, Mad cow disease, and others.

Stanford University, are the ones who set his up as a competition, to encourage rivalry, and it was a great idea. Not only do you contribute to science, but you can measure your efforts, against those around the world, in an almost real time fashion.

We are NOT competing with DU and KOS... they think that they're competing with us. We're trying to get to the top 100, they're still muddling about around #6000, and think that we're just a bunch of befuddled old conservatives, who accidentally found computers, and a worthwhile program.

310 posted on 01/02/2006 10:38:21 PM PST by Klutz Dohanger (*ouch*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
...or anything BESIDES helping with research that has already given benefits that have impacted the lives of humans. THAT is why we do it.

Exactly what benefit is Stanford University getting out of this .. except riding piggy back on other peoples computers and IP addresses??

I don't get this thread

Plus your link in #2 for the DU thread is no longer working

311 posted on 01/02/2006 10:39:15 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Klutz Dohanger
Stanford University, are the ones who set his up as a competition, to encourage rivalry, and it was a great idea.

Stanford can't afford to buy their own computers?

312 posted on 01/02/2006 10:41:33 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Klutz Dohanger
Stanford University, are the ones who set his up as a competition,

That makes it even more sleezy. This must be fun for the lefties at Stanford, they can use CPU time and meanwhile pit left against right. Lovely.

313 posted on 01/02/2006 10:42:53 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
It's not really about helping Stanford per se. What this is is a large research project run by some researchers at Stanford, to study the chemistry of proteins and protein reactions. The idea is that they can use this information to someday treat diseases such as Alzheimers and the like.

Why do they need us? Because it's a massive project, much too massive for even the largest supercomputers to do much with. So, what they've done is split the work up into bite-sized pieces, and asked for volunteers to help with the project. Basically, what we all do is set our computers to work on these bite-sized chunks during the time that they'd otherwise be idle - idle time, because that way it doesn't really cost you anything or interfere with your normal computing. Then, after processing these chunks, your computer sends the results back to Stanford, and fetches another piece to work on.

But, in the spirit of friendly competition, the project creators at Stanford have created a point system, for users to track how much they've contributed to the project. The more computing time you allow them to borrow, the more points you can collect. Also, they've allowed users to form "teams" of contributors, where the team collects all the points for each of its members, and teams can compete as well. DU has a team, DKos has a team, and so forth.

It's really not about "helping Stanford" - except maybe in the same sense that donating time to the local soup kitchen or sending a check to the Red Cross is "helping" the soup kitchen or the Red Cross. The point is not to do it for Stanford, but to do it because this project has the possibility of yielding real medical benefits for people down the road.

Hope that helps! :)

314 posted on 01/02/2006 10:43:27 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Solving protein folding problems requires MASSIVE computer power. This project assigns small bits of the project to over 350,000 computers world wide (like mine), which make the calculations and send back the completed result.


It's an old technique. During the hydrogen bomb project, Ulam and Bethe and Teller would tweak their formula a bit and send instructions to "computers" (women with mechanical calculators) who would slave away through the night, having the mathematical results back to Los Alamos in the morning.


315 posted on 01/02/2006 10:43:46 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Right, and some would say my glass is half empty, too.

So, you would rather not participate ONLY because Stanford MAY get something out of this? What about the people that get treatment and/or cures from this research? Where do they come in to the decision making process?

I get a good feeling, a real warm fuzzy, just knowing that I'm, a contributing part of this project.

If you're looking for a sales pitch, that was it. :O)

No free toasters, no zero interest loans, and absolutely NO Nigerian Uncles!!!


:O)

P
316 posted on 01/02/2006 10:45:21 PM PST by papasmurf (Help beat the DUmmies...Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home Team# 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

As for the IP addresses... if you've ever visited Stanford's home page, you've given them your IP address.


317 posted on 01/02/2006 10:45:55 PM PST by Seamoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

The link was updated in post #71

As for what benefit Stanford University is getting, perhaps it would be better, to think it in terms of what benefit is science getting.

Stanford, is not only pushing the envelope in protein research, but is pioneering a new level in distributed computing.

Perhaps you're not familar with the architecture of "super computers", but 10,000 PC's, working on bits and pieces of a model, are much more efficient that one "super computer", and do the work much faster.

And, the program is "voluntary", so there is no issue of "piggy back".


318 posted on 01/02/2006 10:46:00 PM PST by Klutz Dohanger (*ouch*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
What I don't get is, why one NEEDS to "get" anything? It's not about US, or ME, or MY, or MINE...it's about DOING FOR, giving, helping, lifting the human experience!!! ( did I make you laugh with that last one?)

:O)

P
319 posted on 01/02/2006 10:47:45 PM PST by papasmurf (Help beat the DUmmies...Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home Team# 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
So, you would rather not participate ONLY because Stanford MAY get something out of this?

No, that is not my problem with this. People are sharing cpu usage with Stanford and many understand what they're doing but many don't. Why should Freepers donate cpu usage to a pricy, liberal college?

320 posted on 01/02/2006 10:49:49 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 661-672 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson