Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Preachers must tell us who to ZOT!
December 22, 2005 | americawake

Posted on 12/22/2005 12:14:44 PM PST by americawake

Christian leaders should be more vocal about political issues and about how we should vote and who we should support. We can have a huge impact on the world when we ban together and put people in power that support our values. The days are long gone when we are relegated to the back of the political bus. We are in power and we will remain in power. We are marching proudly with God on our side. May the left burn in hell.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: christian; hateamericafilth; hateamericatrash; hatebush; hatingamerica; ibtz; inb4thezot; inbeforethezot; meowmeowmeow; troll; vote; zot; zotbait; zotme; zotmeharder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: americawake

41 posted on 12/22/2005 2:24:33 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americawake
May the left burn in hell.
 


42 posted on 12/22/2005 2:33:27 PM PST by vigilante2 (zot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
That would make great desktop 'wallpaper'!

Everybody . . . have a very MERRY Viking Kitty CHRISTMAS . . .

43 posted on 12/22/2005 2:50:10 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: americawake

Bzzzzzt!


44 posted on 12/22/2005 3:34:57 PM PST by mhking ("The restroom door said 'gentlemen,' so I just walked inside...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americawake
IATZ
45 posted on 12/22/2005 4:08:40 PM PST by rzeznikj at stout (Save Christmas, Screw the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americawake

46 posted on 12/22/2005 4:12:55 PM PST by tioga (Merry Christmas Everyone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americawake

Message from God...

47 posted on 12/22/2005 4:16:26 PM PST by MarineBrat (Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prous

Ah HA! Thanks. I grok the zot, but didn't know the acronym.


48 posted on 12/22/2005 4:29:15 PM PST by jdsteel (I need a new tag line!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

What was its first post?


49 posted on 12/22/2005 5:20:43 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Tell'em to unban Askel, please.

Why would we want someone back who can't tell the difference between an Al-Qaeda operative and a U.S. soldier?

50 posted on 12/22/2005 6:47:22 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("I want a hippopotamus for Christmas...only a hippopotamus will do!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: americawake


51 posted on 12/22/2005 7:08:37 PM PST by PilloryHillary (Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americawake
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
52 posted on 12/22/2005 7:26:58 PM PST by IYellAtMyTV (The Left -- playing russian roulette with an automatic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

So we can explain the difference?


53 posted on 12/22/2005 7:46:48 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: annalex
So we can explain the difference?

Already tried. In her world people who go out of their way to violate the Geneva Convention should be treated as honorable Geneva combatants. Americans and other honorable troops wear uniforms, avoid targeting civilians, etc., Al-Qaeda guys don't, and Askel thinks they should be treated the same way.

I can elaborate if necessary, but for now I'll just say that she has been banned because when it comes to war and military issues she is a complete barking moonbat and treats those who disagree with her as people who oppose the well-being of our troops. We need that crap around here like a hole in the head.

54 posted on 12/22/2005 7:57:47 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("I want a hippopotamus for Christmas...only a hippopotamus will do!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

So? I trust you expressed yourself well. Others read you and can make up their mind.

This is a discussion forum. We need all kinds. She was a good contributor to the religion forum in particular. If she is passionate about the well-being of our troops, that is a premise from which everyone should argue. She is an original and articulate thinker, an asset everywhere.


55 posted on 12/22/2005 8:06:12 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: annalex
This is a discussion forum. We need all kinds.

Well sure we do. Why don't we ask Howard Dean or Skinner from DU to be Freepers and I can argue with them and have the readers make up their minds? This is a conservative discussion forum, and there is nothing conservative about equating the residents of Club Gitmo with the residents of the Hanoi Hilton.

If she is passionate about the well-being of our troops, that is a premise from which everyone should argue.

She wanted child murderers to be accorded the same honor as legitimate soldiers. Geneva protections are an honor due to a combatant who acts like a soldier. Granting them to Al-Qaeda operatives is like giving Tookie Williams a policeman's funeral. If someone wanted Tookie to have a full-honors funeral from the LAPD, would you consider that person supportive of police officers?

She is an original and articulate thinker, an asset everywhere.

Does "original thinker" include her campaign to brand George W. Bush as the foremost promoter of abortion on planet Earth? You know, it's nice and all if she said nice things on some religion threads, but her main angles in the news threads were Club Gitmo=Hanoi Hilton and Bush loves abortion. That stuff belongs at DU. There's plenty of diversity of thought on this forum without that silliness.

56 posted on 12/23/2005 4:09:21 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("I want a hippopotamus for Christmas...only a hippopotamus will do!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

No, you are redefining conservatism along the lines of your own brand. Many paleoconservatives opposed the war in Iraq, and many religious conservatives do not find the GOP sufficiently pro-life. I am not going to argue for her positions, whith many of which I disagree myself, in her absence, but I am familiar with her views and it would not occur to me to label them unconservative.


57 posted on 12/23/2005 7:38:26 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: annalex
No, you are redefining conservatism along the lines of your own brand. Many paleoconservatives opposed the war in Iraq, and many religious conservatives do not find the GOP sufficiently pro-life.

Actually, you are doing the redefining, rewriting my statements to fit some misconception of yours. I said neither of those things, not in my conversation with you or anywhere else.

I did not say opposing the war was unconservative, nor do I believe it to be. Granted, I've been quite hard on the anti-war freepers, but that's because their arguments are dangerous and usually informed more by dislike of the neo-cons than by any actual paleoconservative principle. It is also not unconservative to consider the GOP to be insufficiently pro-life. But then, I never accused Askel of doing that. I accused her of portraying the President as a rabid supporter of abortion, and of equating U.S. military personnel and terrorists. She did both of those things, and that crap belongs on DU.

I'll ask again and add a question: If a freeper called herself a friend of police, but was adamant that Tookie Williams get an LAPD full honors funeral, would you consider that person a supporter of police? And if that person then turned around and accused those who disagreed of being anti-police, would you think they were following the conventions of civil and rational debate; would they belong here?

58 posted on 12/28/2005 6:22:36 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (I have come here to chew bubble gum and write taglines, and I'm all out of bubble gum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback; Askel5
I accused her of portraying the President as a rabid supporter of abortion, and of equating U.S. military personnel and terrorists. She did both of those things, and that crap belongs on DU.

Ah, OK. Askel would say the darndest things. I see your point. Do you see mine? I cannot defend every post she made, but I can vouch for her character and patriotism. Hers is not two-faced mendacity of the left, but a heartfelt hyperbole coming from the paleocon right. She deserves to be reinstated, -- if of course, she wants to.

59 posted on 12/29/2005 11:41:21 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson